Oh, now that I have working links, I unfortunately can see, what @Wuerfel_21 meant. (I do think, that the wording is a bit harsh!) It is indeed a very tiny acorn right now, many and all the more tricky things are just not there.
I don't think that AI or humans should be fed with incorrect facts.
Of course this might be once something very great. But with the acorn being so small at this moment, perhaps some smaller wording might be a good idea for the time being? Instead of:
VonSzarvas, I have the same experience with these old links, 404, but if you go to Stephen's recent YouTube video, "Developing for the Parallax Propeller v2 with Claude Code", there is a link there to the P2 Knowledge Base. I followed that link and there are setup instructions. I had no idea what to do with them, so I copied and pasted into Claude Code on my Linux terminal. Claude knew what to do with it. It all seemed to go very smoothly and Claude says he has the P2 stuff and that we are ready to go. We will see.
@"Christof Eb." said:
I still get Error 404 with your first link.
@VonSzarvas thank you for helping me get Chrostof's point! ;-) Geez, how'd I miss this?
The link at the top post is fixed... Thanks to both of you!
Awesome!
What I'd also tried to articulate was that the 4 other links in that first post also have "bad" links. The same adjustment is required on all those too.
@"Christof Eb." said:
It is indeed a very tiny acorn right now; many and all the more tricky things are just not there.
Yes, it is very tiny! It is a proof of concept, and after a full two months of working on it, it's working pretty well, as evidenced by the video demo and others' experiences trying to follow along. This is a large body of work, and my approach has been to go very wide initially, with early passes at consuming all published content for the P2. The work has progressed well, but there is still a significant amount to be done.
I appreciate your interest. I'm hearing your suggestions and acting on them. I've revised the top-level page so that it doesn't look as active as you pointed out. As this project proceeds, I'll activate more areas... This page came about as a planning document for the entire shape. Unfortunately, when published, this came across as already being present, and there's just no way it could have been, given the amount of time spent on the project so far.
@VonSzarvas said:
Is it possible the correct links in your first post should be adjusted? They are all 404.
Example- I think "Repository" should be: https://github.com/ironsheep/P2-Knowledge-Base
If you agree then I think you can edit; but let me know if any help needed.
Okay, I think it's all cleaned up now. (I'm moving too fast if I'm leaving these kinds of things broken.)
Comments
@"Stephen Moraco"
Thank you for making a very healthy start on all this. A huge contribution and effort.
From little acorns grow....
Oh, now that I have working links, I unfortunately can see, what @Wuerfel_21 meant. (I do think, that the wording is a bit harsh!) It is indeed a very tiny acorn right now, many and all the more tricky things are just not there.
I don't think that AI or humans should be fed with incorrect facts.
So, would you like to check these for example:
From https://github.com/ironsheep/P2-Knowledge-Base/blob/main/deliverables/reference/pasm2-essentials.md :
Is this really working like this?
I have never used augd, but I have some doubts:
Also PA, PB and memory alignment????
Of course this might be once something very great. But with the acorn being so small at this moment, perhaps some smaller wording might be a good idea for the time being? Instead of:
VonSzarvas, I have the same experience with these old links, 404, but if you go to Stephen's recent YouTube video, "Developing for the Parallax Propeller v2 with Claude Code", there is a link there to the P2 Knowledge Base. I followed that link and there are setup instructions. I had no idea what to do with them, so I copied and pasted into Claude Code on my Linux terminal. Claude knew what to do with it. It all seemed to go very smoothly and Claude says he has the P2 stuff and that we are ready to go. We will see.
@VonSzarvas thank you for helping me get Chrostof's point! ;-) Geez, how'd I miss this?
The link at the top post is fixed... Thanks to both of you!
Awesome!
What I'd also tried to articulate was that the 4 other links in that first post also have "bad" links. The same adjustment is required on all those too.
Yes, it is very tiny! It is a proof of concept, and after a full two months of working on it, it's working pretty well, as evidenced by the video demo and others' experiences trying to follow along. This is a large body of work, and my approach has been to go very wide initially, with early passes at consuming all published content for the P2. The work has progressed well, but there is still a significant amount to be done.
I appreciate your interest. I'm hearing your suggestions and acting on them. I've revised the top-level page so that it doesn't look as active as you pointed out. As this project proceeds, I'll activate more areas... This page came about as a planning document for the entire shape. Unfortunately, when published, this came across as already being present, and there's just no way it could have been, given the amount of time spent on the project so far.
So, thank you for keeping me honest.
Regards,
Stephen
Okay, I think it's all cleaned up now. (I'm moving too fast if I'm leaving these kinds of things broken.)
Thank you all for your patience!