Neuralink Presentation - Live Demo video - Screenshots + P2 Brain Interface
Bob Lawrence (VE1RLL)
Posts: 1,720
Neuralink Presentation - Live demo with Pigs.
The Video Starts around 48.5
WATCH: Elon Musk's Neuralink Presentation (full working demo)
Products such as Neralink will allow us to interface to products like the P2, iPhones etc.. The neurons in your brain can generate 1's and 0's, what could you use it for ? Also If you built a P2 robot and used a Neuralink intercace you could dump your personal memory to your robot . How would you use this type of technolgy with a P2, P3 etc . It may still seem like science fiction today but it will be here long before the P3
Elon Musk wants YOU to build a brain-computer interface
https://www.cp24.com/world/elon-musk-wants-you-to-build-a-brain-computer-interface-1.5084153
Who wants to start on a Neuralink object for the P2? LOL
The Video Starts around 48.5
WATCH: Elon Musk's Neuralink Presentation (full working demo)
Products such as Neralink will allow us to interface to products like the P2, iPhones etc.. The neurons in your brain can generate 1's and 0's, what could you use it for ? Also If you built a P2 robot and used a Neuralink intercace you could dump your personal memory to your robot . How would you use this type of technolgy with a P2, P3 etc . It may still seem like science fiction today but it will be here long before the P3
Elon Musk wants YOU to build a brain-computer interface
https://www.cp24.com/world/elon-musk-wants-you-to-build-a-brain-computer-interface-1.5084153
Who wants to start on a Neuralink object for the P2? LOL
Comments
Concern over augmented people quickly escalated into a Supreme Court decision stripping "Amped" people of all rights.
New hair styles came into vogue making the entry point obvious. Either there is just skin, or some sign of biohackery.
The story arc from there sees these people retreat into nowhere USA and their struggles from there. It is a quick romp. Fun read. Thought provoking.
All that said, I think people could make good use of an implant farther from the brain. A two way thing, pick up muscle / nerve signals, and the device sending some sensation back.
Pretty harmless, but to those willing to learn, it would basically be a command line stream.
In another book, Bliss "Cities in Space" people spoke "mechanese" and 56k was optimal throughput for a peak human communicator.
I have seen good HAM ops able to use Morse via blinking lights while having conversations or doing other activities...
With some software, even very modest throughput, say characters/symbols per second could be very useful. Even just a few.
Think driving while the nav streams directions to you. Or you control a thing hands free. Even writing code while waiting in line at the grocery store, or maybe this post?
Use of symbols as words could make for a very potent control and or comms channel. A whole lot can be done.
To me, Musk is crazy aggressive. If we allow super rich people, I am glad to see one really try stuff. In concept we gain. But, it is real aggression. Dangerous. I think I will wait this one out.
One EMP type event, and what happens? I shudder to think about that, or even more basic attacks or scenarios. Could end up banned from getting near RF, for example. Or that MRI?
I am still here reading most days. Crazy busy. Got my flat panel and P2 and get some time with it every so often. Keep up the good work.
Chip made a monster.
usually i never comment off topic discussions but
all this Transhumanism and Posthumanism, what a gigantic Smile!
For all German speaking (or reading) people I urgently recommend the following new book
from Richard D. PRECHT: Künstliche Intelligenz und der Sinn des Lebens
( English: Artificial Intelligence and the Meaning of Life)
I am quite sure this will be also published in English in the next months!
An excellent book dismantling all this omnipotence fantasies of this
group of the worlds greatest capitalists which are thinking all this money
what the stock market is lending them (they haven't earned it)
make the them also omnipotent.
In a certain way I can understand, why people are demonstrating against all this, Bezzo's, Musk's, Gate's,
Page's, etc. They are demonstrating for the wrong reasons, but they are pointing to the right people.
If this companies / guys would really want to bring the mankind on better level, they should:
- pay taxes where they earn their money,
- not cooperate with all the ' security agencies' of the world
- care about the environment
- not abuse their monopoly.
Electrodes in a pigs brain, how pitiful.
Regards
Markus
Yes, the notion of uploading yourself into another body or a robot is completely absurd.
"Okay, sir, we've uploaded your consciousness into the new unit. Now we will retire your old unit."
"Uh, what do you mean? I'm still here. This is still me."
"No, sir, Your consciousness will carry on in the new unit. Per our contract, you have agreed to the retirement of your old carbon-positive unit."
We do not allow political topics on this forum. :)
....
You know where this is all going.
Go with it, or go away from it all.
Get a neuralink only to have an E.M.P., FRY YOU, have fun with that.
Burn your cell phone.
Grow a garden, be loved by the sun, not the grid.
There developing / developed a custom chip specifically for this use. Thousands of input channels.
The implant machine is used due to the thin fragile wires to be implanted. (input channels)
So basically they designed a custom chip with thousands of a/d converters and a high speed output. It uses a usb connection. ( Didn't mention the protocol)
So with my limited use of EMG signals to control my robot arm all this interest me.
Is anyone here also interested in this?
Your thoughts?
( My profile image is a A/D board is designed for this purpose, Old design and single channel)
https://forums.parallax.com/discussion/172098/neuralink-presentation-live-demo-video-screenshots#latest
5G, for example...is there reason to be concerned? All I know is that everything has a resonant frequency. Ella Fitzgerald (and others) shattering a glass, etc.
There's so much to discuss related to our world situation, and so much conflict of opinion about what the truth is, that open discussion would likely cause some of us to suddenly suppose that other people on this forum are our enemies. Then, there goes the neighborhood. I'm kind of thinking that it's a good idea to not gum things up. It's my experience that almost nobody changes their opinions about deeply-contested things, but they certainly take note of others' opinions. I think we've been programmed to react like this. We also live amid a lot of deception, making it hard to know what the truth is.
A lot of information that we go by is not readily verifiable. Like, does 60 GHz radiation really disrupt O2 chemistry in living organisms? It would be great to do experiments to test out these ideas. That's what's lacking in all this. All someone would have to do is demonstrate this in a YouTube (or Bitchute) video and, if it's true, it would become much harder to deny, although much belief these days is pathological. I remember seeing a video of a guy walking around a part of Silicon Valley with an RF power meter, where some early 5G antennas had been set up. He was reading 1W/m^2 of power at millimeter wavelengths. The "safe" amount is known to be 1mW/m^2. He was just on the sidewalk. So, that doesn't seem good, but few people have the wherewithal to actually investigate anything. It would be great to design equipment that puts this capability into anyone's hands who's interested.
How Do I enlarge this text so big that it is the only thing EVERYONE can see, EVERYWHERE, I want it to take over facebook, twitter, every website, every billboard, every sign, every freeway sign, every street painting in front of trump (is this a swear word now?)... tower... etc...
Them: "Its a conspiracy theory."
Me: Uhh, no sir, I did the math, I ran tests, I ran experiments, I researched the statistical history, I extrapolated into and out of, other sciences very closely related, I even tested it on my self at great peril, sure I didn't die, but I was not ok.
Them: "so you didn't die? SEE! you are WRONG!"
Them: "your a conspiracy theoryist..."
Me: You can't even spell it right. *And its, you're* Please stop talking.
Wouldn't matter to "them" no matter how how big you make the text, how loud you announce the facts, or how bright and clear you make the pictures and videos. Sad to say, but about a third of the population is so dumb that they think they are very smart. How else could a moron that brags about being a "stable genius" end up as president.
I imagine none of us would fully agree on half a dozen such issues with anyone else here. On any single issue, there's maybe only a 50% chance of agreement with another person. Nobody will be changing their mind about anything significant, to the universal consternation of everyone who is concerned. My own mom sees things opposite of how I do, at least because she listens to different news than I do, but maybe it's a function of personality, too. We each think the other is mistaken. These are the times we are living in.
There are a lot of things we disagree on, but that doesn't stop me from respecting you as a person and liking you as a good friend.
If 100% agreement is a requirement for respect and friendship, then no one has any friends nor do they respect anyone, because no one agrees 100%.
That's all true, but we can get so stirred up that we may threaten to nuke our friendships in exasperation.
I remember maybe a year ago that you wrote something on Facebook that went about like this: "If any if you have the audacity to call yourselves Christians and support Donald Trump, please unfriend me. I want nothing to do with you, hypocrite!"
I hope I'm not embarrassing you. I've said ridiculous things to people myself, like, one time, and this is really shameful, I sort of accused Tracy Allen of helping communists by building gas sensors to monitor cooking fire emissions in the third world. How embarrassing! I'm sure he forgave me because he sees past stuff like that, having maturity and magnanimity. I've felt bad about that for a while.
Anyway, we are probably all inclined to friendship, but the world does its best to divide us over all kinds of things that we really don't have much certainty of and little to no control over. We are not each other's enemies.
Interfacing to the brain? What possible benefit?
How about curing a few things like cancer and diabetes?
All I have ever seen is "donate to cancer research" but never "cure".
What do these people do every day?
"hey dad, what did you do at work today?"
"oh I researched some cancer stuff"
😂😂😂
I came across this 1967, 3-LP recording.
Explains a lot. Not only about the wars but also about current events.
Similar distrust for hand/arm transplants. Not really proven yet, but give it time. I’d bet if it’s your hand/arm or leg missing, you’ll be hoping for a breakthrough.
We already have leg prosthetics
Bet those that are blind cannot wait for some breakthroughs in these brain experiments, and what if you’re a paraplegic or quadriplegic?
Without this research, nothing happens!
It is obvious that you diden't take time to watch the presentation before you criticized it.
Some of the things that they are working on are, just to mention a few:
Cure blindness, paralysis, deafness, and mental illness.
If they could only do one of these thing it would benifit Millions of people and help improve their lives.
They may even find a cure for negative thinking people someday LOL
Heck, make it the law. Mandatory brain implants at birth.
Thought police?
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." <--- taboo negative thought.
Good bye world, its been a good attempt, but the grind of the flesh, is too wrought with desire, demand, and destruction.
The transition from a world of values to a world of money has already happened.
It truly is just a matter of time.
You can't exist (unless you live uneducated on the street) without:
A social security number, vaccines, an ID, a shirt, shoes, a PHONE, (and now a mask), .....
You do realize a wireless grid connected brain implant will eventually be the same.
Because money.
To put it more appropriate to this forum....
1996 and Dolly the sheep was cloned. Where are the spare parts for humans that could have saved lives?
Will the companies that develop the cures make money from it? Sure they will, otherwise why would they do it?
You cannot have one without the other.
There are upsides and downsides to everything.
Just look at computers and the internet. There are hackers launching all sorts of bad viruses that endanger life, and demanding ransom. They are being aided by the researchers who are getting paid lots of cash to find the security flaws, and then publish those flaws to help the hackers. As a result, our computers now run at half speed. Just doesn’t seem right to me.
But don't talk about it because you will be banned on some, if not all platforms.... eventually.
Agree with the owner of the local public square, or you loose access to the local public square.
QUE THE MONEY SONG! It all...always seems to come back to the morals vs money, .... money won long ago. Everyone wants to be "TRUMPIN" (sorry for using the swear word, again.)
While the chip has the ability to measure many channels human brain has 86 billion neurons.
Compare to pig 425 million, cat 250 and dog150 nurons.
Still cool and heck!
Yup, it's always a money thing. It was at least 21 years ago that there was talk of curing Type-1 diabetes through stem-cells or something and my Type-1-diabetic son became extremely excited. Then it all went quiet.
Goldman Sachs....curing patients a sustainable business model?