$5.64 WiFi Drone Video Camera
Edited 9/26/17: Changed the title from $11.55 to $5.64 per Buck Rogers. Now save 80%! Choose the US-NYC warehouse option.
Half-price now (at $11.55): https://www.gearbest.com/rc-quadcopter-parts/pp_212594.html Says only 8 left, just like it did before I ordered two!
This is one of the cameras I wrote about in SERVO magazine (February 2017) at http://www.servomagazine.com/index.php/magazine/article/february2016_WiFiVideoCameras . That article just went public, no subscription required.
No sound, not the highest-resolution cam available, and about a half-second of video lag, but very cheap and the MJX app (as downloaded directly from MJX, not Google play, last I checked) has the split screen option to give a binocular view for use with the VR phone goggles that are available everywhere for $5. Very immersive.
Just hook the cam up to a LiPo/Li-Ion and you're streaming:
Half-price now (at $11.55): https://www.gearbest.com/rc-quadcopter-parts/pp_212594.html Says only 8 left, just like it did before I ordered two!
This is one of the cameras I wrote about in SERVO magazine (February 2017) at http://www.servomagazine.com/index.php/magazine/article/february2016_WiFiVideoCameras . That article just went public, no subscription required.
No sound, not the highest-resolution cam available, and about a half-second of video lag, but very cheap and the MJX app (as downloaded directly from MJX, not Google play, last I checked) has the split screen option to give a binocular view for use with the VR phone goggles that are available everywhere for $5. Very immersive.
Just hook the cam up to a LiPo/Li-Ion and you're streaming:
Comments
This is indeed an interesting concept. I've got an interesting idea for a BOE bot style frame, so, ah, that rig would be a good fit.
But I'm only talking through my lucky hat here.
I can't tell you how much I appreciate all your posts and test videos! Thanks for the link to the article too.
$5.64!!!
My quick Ebay scan turns up a best price of $13: http://www.ebay.com/itm/MJX-C4005-WIFI-fpv-Camera-used-to-X401H-X601H-X400-X500-X600-X800-X101-x6sw-/112544982916
Erco, really appreciate the links, and the follow ups with how they perform
what is with that obsession of you with erco, his robots and cats?
Is this some kind of inside joke that just you understand?
I find it quite distracting in a mostly technical forum to read nonsense like that.
Mike
Simply to enter some humor into a discussion.
And actually it is an inside joke, to myself and a good number of members. Besides erco has not as of yet complained. And besides nothing really leaves his house, they are all right there, including the four cats who only communicate with a Brooklyn accent. Including the one who wears a Brooklyn Dodgers hat.....
Now, it's infuriating.
Sorry, but there we are.
I was similarly honored in 2013 when I found THIS online. Had no idea I was so honored, it just popped up in a Google search. Humanoido never mentioned it AFAIK.
I was amazed when I found my Zicog Z80 emulator project turned up on Hackaday. https://hackaday.com/2009/12/27/zilog-in-a-matchbox/
With huge creds to Cluso for making that tiny board of course.
I don't think either of us imagined that would happen.
Edit: Just received my $5 cams from NYC, so the deal is real. Thanks Buck, you out-ercoed me!
no image. I decided to try my old acer tablet for which the Google Play store showed only the c4006 app, which I installed. It worked. I installed this app on the Pixel and Galaxy Tab. It worked on the tablet but, while it showed high signal strength on the Pixel, there was no image.
Nick
As I mentioned in my first post, Google Play hosts a different version of the c4005 app than the MJX website. The Google play version lacks the 3D split screen option. (At least as of late 2016, I haven't tried it lately). So try both versions if you have problems. MJX's app works fine on all the phones & tablets I've tried, after sideloading it from a uSD card.
I've noticed that MJX and Syma cams & apps are compatible & interchangeable, but Syma's app also lacks the 3D feature.
Have you tried compressing and then posting it?
Interesting. I wonder what the result would be if you changed the file type, and what you would see if you opened it with an ascii or hex editor.
http://www.mjxrc.net/down/application.html
Nick