Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Mars is a One Way Ticket — Parallax Forums

Mars is a One Way Ticket

HumanoidoHumanoido Posts: 5,770
edited 2012-08-21 19:59 in General Discussion
http://www.myfoxny.com/story/19262671/group-plans-mars-settlement

If the journey to Mars is one way, never to return to Earth for the rest of your life, will you go?
«13

Comments

  • TorTor Posts: 2,010
    edited 2012-08-14 05:51
    Only if there weren't a bunch of other blokes going - I'm one of those who can be away (_far_ away) from people and civilization for a long time, but not if I have to bunk up with others. By myself I'm perfectly fine.

    -Tor
  • mindrobotsmindrobots Posts: 6,506
    edited 2012-08-14 06:36
    Being mildly misanthropic (I'd enjoy Tor's company because he'd keep to his space!), up until I was married in 1986, I would have gone. Now, with wife and kid, I still don't like most people but it would be selfish to leave them. Some days, however.......
  • GadgetmanGadgetman Posts: 2,436
    edited 2012-08-14 07:23
    Probably not.

    I'm too much a creature of comfort.
    Also, I prefer to stay alive and sane.
    (And far from nutcases)

    They want to start the colony with 4 people?
    Then add 4 colonists every 2 years?

    It'll take a very long time before that colony reaches the numbers neeed for survival.
    Feel free toread up on the 50/500 rule.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_colonization#Population_size

    Some of the very first colonists would need to be medical personell,

    What happens when the audience loses interest after the first of second group of colonists are on their way?
    (Anyone knows how many watched the final Apollo mission lift off on TV? )

    Anyone have any idea how difficult it is to run a properly balanced Hydroponics system in a closed environment for many years at a time?
    (Actually, they'll probably want several, with separate recycling systems in case of contaminants or dieases)
    Picking the right plants, animals, insects, fish... is a difficult task.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_2

    What kind of power systems will they set up?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BIOS-3
    In BIOS-3 they used lots of 20KW Xenon lamps (all in all, 400KW for 3 people)

    Setting up a permanent colony isn''t possible before we have located usable resources such as metals and can mine them remotely.
  • Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi)Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi) Posts: 23,514
    edited 2012-08-14 07:45
    I would not go. I can visit our own desert Southwest for a lot less time and effort, breathe the air there, interact with other life forms, and still return to the Pacific Northwest, where life is good.

    -Phil
  • lardomlardom Posts: 1,659
    edited 2012-08-14 08:45
    The trip will take more than eight months. "I'm going to park the ship. I want to get out and stretch." I wouldn't even consider moving to an uninhabited island. You no longer would have much use for language among other things.
  • Martin_HMartin_H Posts: 4,051
    edited 2012-08-14 10:48
    No way I would go. First, there's no way I would want to cut myself off from everyone I know. Second, their funding model is essentially a reality TV show. Well what if the show gets canceled? There's no way to be self sufficient and home base now has no funding to help you out. Donner party in space doesn't appeal to me, and the knowledge that the pathos will make a great PBS documentary doesn't make cannibalism any easier to swallow.
  • prof_brainoprof_braino Posts: 4,313
    edited 2012-08-14 11:07
    I'd go. Life would be little different than it is now. I'm always locked in the lab, or sitting in front of the computer. Makes no difference if I'm in this little room here or that little room waaaaayyy over there, as long as I have the parts for the projects. I only venture out to repair critical system as it is (dishwasher, dryer, plumbing).

    They might have to upgrade my Netflix account, and guarantee shipping on parts from china, but how much slower could it get?
  • Dave HeinDave Hein Posts: 6,347
    edited 2012-08-14 11:08
    Who would want to go? The atmosphere is mostly CO2 with a density/pressure about 1% of that on earth. The temperature is very cold. You would live in a pressurized tank, and could only venture outside by donning a pressurized suit. You would have a really lousy internet connection with a really long latency. And if you think shipping costs are high from the U.S. to Europe wait till you try to get a Prop shipped to you on Mars.
  • ercoerco Posts: 20,259
    edited 2012-08-14 11:16
    If it includes all the (protein-synthesized) strawberry & blueberry Hostess pies you can eat, I know the guy for this mission...
  • PublisonPublison Posts: 12,366
    edited 2012-08-14 12:00
    I would not go. I can visit our own desert Southwest for a lot less time and effort, breathe the air there, interact with other life forms, and still return to the Pacific Northwest, where life is good.

    -Phil

    And I don't think Curiosity has found any shrimpz yet.
  • NWCCTVNWCCTV Posts: 3,629
    edited 2012-08-14 12:05
    There was a program a few days ago about this (Discovery Channel, I believe. I will try to locate it and post here). They say within ten years there will be people actually living there in the pods shown in the video. There are several companies, most of which are in Euorpe that are working on this and will end up teaming up to do this. I suspect if that is the case, within 20 years they will be able to build something there that would allow a return trip. The 3D concrete printer can be used to build large facilities there!!!!

    Edit:
    The program is called Mars Rising. It is on Discovery's Science Channel.
  • rod1963rod1963 Posts: 752
    edited 2012-08-14 12:13
    Who wants to live in a tin can, develop all the illnesses associated with low gravity living, hang out with a bunch of loons who couldn't live on Earth. Yeah that's real attractive.

    But it gets better, if your suit develops a leak, you die horribly. If your living module stops working you die horribly. You have to be watchful of your partners who may or may not go nuts and if that happens you have to kill them(NASA's contingencies for this weren't pleasant). Resources are scarce and you can't afford to keep the mentally ill or very sick around for very long. You get diabetes, well there's the airlock, so take a long hike and don't come back.

    Has all the makings of a good horror movie.
  • ercoerco Posts: 20,259
    edited 2012-08-14 12:42
    @Rod: At least you can count on your error-free, all-managing computer, Hal 9000.
  • mindrobotsmindrobots Posts: 6,506
    edited 2012-08-14 12:56
    Wow, Rod, You're a real "air tank half empty" kinda guy! :smile:
  • davejamesdavejames Posts: 4,047
    edited 2012-08-14 13:17
    erco wrote: »
    If it includes all the (protein-synthesized) strawberry & blueberry Hostess pies you can eat, I know the guy for this mission...

    ...awww - you guyz!!!
  • davejamesdavejames Posts: 4,047
    edited 2012-08-14 13:18
    rod1963 wrote: »
    Who wants to live in a tin can, develop all the illnesses associated with low gravity living, hang out with a bunch of loons who couldn't live on Earth. Yeah that's real attractive.

    But it gets better, if your suit develops a leak, you die horribly. If your living module stops working you die horribly. You have to be watchful of your partners who may or may not go nuts and if that happens you have to kill them(NASA's contingencies for this weren't pleasant). Resources are scarce and you can't afford to keep the mentally ill or very sick around for very long. You get diabetes, well there's the airlock, so take a long hike and don't come back.

    Has all the makings of a good horror movie.


    ...and, your point is???

    :smile:
  • Peter KG6LSEPeter KG6LSE Posts: 1,383
    edited 2012-08-14 13:20
    SIGN ME UP !!!!!!!!!


    It would be a honor to take that risk !
  • prof_brainoprof_braino Posts: 4,313
    edited 2012-08-14 15:23
    Dave Hein wrote: »
    Who would want to go? ... wait till you try to get a Prop shipped to you on Mars.

    I guess there ARE some drawbacks. I better call that NASA guy back....
  • GadgetmanGadgetman Posts: 2,436
    edited 2012-08-14 15:37
    davejames wrote: »
    ...and, your point is???

    The point is that if you weren't a loonie before the trip, listening for leaks or 'weird noises' from the recycing, or the fear that one of your fellow colonists wil turn psycho is almost guarranteed to send you to the madhouse...
    And as a small colony won't have spare resources to care for you, it won't take long before... you know...you never wake up...
    (Even a serious depression can be enough, especially if they think it may make you do something that endangers anyone else.)

    Some forms of Diabetes and other diseases can be controlled with a strict diet, but if you need Insulin... Might as well take a short walk out the airlock without a suit.
    (You'd be instantly disqualified from outside work, you can't be used for any critical supervision, and will probably be required to never be alone for more than a few minutes. In short, you'd be just about useless. )

    Somewhere I once read that a person can survive for 30 seconds without a spacesuit in outer space...
    That is for a 'certain degree' of survive...
    (If they hook you up to an iron lung to replace the boody mess in your chest, and you're OK with living without sight, hearing and probably taste, and so on... )

    A small leak in a suit can be patched up, but a broken helmet is death.
    Sand and grit in joints will slowly destroy the suit, no matter how well you maintain it. And suits are custom fitted to the user. (They won't need to be as bulky as the suits used in space or on the moon, though)
    How long will they last, and when they do fail, where will they get replacement suits?

    The way I see it, you'd need a small town worth of colonists to keep the colony alive for more than a decade.
    And of course regular resupply ships.
  • PublisonPublison Posts: 12,366
    edited 2012-08-14 15:52
    Again HAL 9000 will take care of you.

    I had a HAL response seconds ready before ecro posted.

    Curse you erco. :)
  • TtailspinTtailspin Posts: 1,326
    edited 2012-08-14 16:23
    I would go, but we gonna have to negotiate the whole Rube Goldburg Sky Crane landing thing beforehand...


    -Tommy
  • ercoerco Posts: 20,259
    edited 2012-08-14 16:57
    Publison wrote: »
    Again HAL 9000 will take care of you.

    I had a HAL response seconds ready before ecro posted.

    Curse you erco. :)

    It's getting to be a lot of work staying a step ahead of everyone with all my wisecracks and Ebay deals.
  • HumanoidoHumanoido Posts: 5,770
    edited 2012-08-14 19:36
    The report omitted real numbers - initially 4 human colonists and 4,000 Japanese humanoid robots. The robots grow food, maintain the environment, take care of the sick, do materials mining and manufacturing, build vast facilities and construct futuristic cities. They will also provide high tech toys, do routine maintenance (the latest model line of Curiosity Cars included), reproduce, conduct the Mars Colonists Space Program and interplanetary ventures (where asteroids will be mined for diamonds and precious metals), expand colonist bases to other parts of the Solar System, and keep any HAL 9000 in check. It will be so modern and futuristic, with many opportunities, no one will want to return to Earth.
  • mindrobotsmindrobots Posts: 6,506
    edited 2012-08-14 19:39
    I forgot to ask, can I get really good pizza? That's a deal breaker for me!
  • SRLMSRLM Posts: 5,045
    edited 2012-08-14 20:22
    I'd go. It's an opportunity to expand our capabilities, and start providing redundancy for humanity.
  • SRLMSRLM Posts: 5,045
    edited 2012-08-14 20:23
    mindrobots wrote: »
    I forgot to ask, can I get really good pizza? That's a deal breaker for me!

    Delivery is much faster when you're local: http://www.killerpizzafrommars.com/
  • W9GFOW9GFO Posts: 4,010
    edited 2012-08-15 02:05
    I would go if it weren't for one thing. The type of people that would make for a good reality show are not the ones I would want to spend the rest of my life with.
  • mindrobotsmindrobots Posts: 6,506
    edited 2012-08-15 03:23
    W9GFO wrote: »
    I would go if it weren't for one thing. The type of people that would make for a good reality show are not the ones I would want to spend the rest of my life with.

    +1......more like +5!!
  • skylightskylight Posts: 1,915
    edited 2012-08-15 05:35
    How long before the isolation gets to you and sends you loopy?
    Would you be allowed to live your life under your own terms or would you still be bound by rules and regulations from your masters on earth?
    As you would be reliant on those in charge back on earth for a very long time I doubt you could create your own utopia .You would do all the hard graft and build what you would like to call home and once done the authoritarians and leaders will arrive and change everything to suit themselves and you will once more become a cog in the machine.

    I wonder how long it would take mankind to have it's first war on Mars?
  • Dave HeinDave Hein Posts: 6,347
    edited 2012-08-15 08:16
    Anybody interested in going on this trip might try training on one of the high altitude mountain peaks in Nepal. That's about as close as you can get to the Mars enviroment on the surface of the Earth. Of course, even a mountain peak is 100 times better than what you'll find on Mars.

    I worked at NASA-Ames many years ago, and the building I worked in had a large room that could be evacuated to very low pressures. It was orignally used to check out the structural design of rockets in a vacuum. Later on it was used to simulate the Martain atmosphere. It contained a wind tunnel that was used to study how sand dunes were created on Mars. Maybe they'll let people rent some time in that room to see if they really want to live on Mars.
Sign In or Register to comment.