A New Prop Printed Circuit Board
Humanoido
Posts: 5,770
Can you tell me if anyone has made printed circuit boards in three dimensions, i.e. in mathematical shapes with curves? To minimize challenges with the chip plane, a 44-Pin QFN Chip and a retainer could be used.
Comments
Flexible PCBs could be constrained to fit many mathematical functions. I can't think what use it would be, though.
Leon
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
Post Edited (Leon) : 12/29/2009 11:46:21 AM GMT
It's easier mechanically to have areas of stiffening in the design, ie a rigid area to place the components, with the flexible areas handling the interconnect.
I've only used them where there was no alternative spacewise; but you have to be really careful with the mechanical design regarding bend radii etc and understanding the consequences of flexibility or movement or reliability suffers.
Regards,
T o n y
Post Edited (humanoido) : 12/29/2009 3:50:21 PM GMT
Leon
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
For me, the past is not over yet.
Leon
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
Post Edited (Leon) : 12/29/2009 4:53:30 PM GMT
If you want to build a massively parallel system, there are much better devices than the Propeller.
Leon
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
Leon
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Amateur radio callsign: G1HSM
Post Edited (Leon) : 12/29/2009 10:41:25 PM GMT
Though the PCB's were flat (like normal) they were curved (like a piece of slot car track).
Instead of a curved surface, could you get away with a series of flat boards arranged in a sphere? (much like a 20 {or more} sided die?)
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
=================
The future is in our hands.
Which way to the future?
=================
A little fairy dust and yetti poop will get things moving nicely.
I hate to say it...but that is funny. You guys crack me up.
I think Humanoid was being serious........I took it that way.
I see what you are getting at, but I don't think there is a way to implement it. Even Flex PCB are going to have restrictions. So a compound curve is probably never going to happen, without some major bucks spent to do it. A compound curve will never sit flat (without relief cuts), so having one made would be extremely difficult and expensive.
Interesting twist (no pun intended).......but probably not feasible.
James L
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
James L
Partner/Designer
Lil Brother SMT Assembly Services
Are you addicted to technology or Micro-controllers..... then checkout the forums at Savage Circuits. Learn to build your own Gizmos!
- define the detail of the lattice using a 3D CAD model;
- micro-fabricate the resulting 3D matrix in titanium using laser sintering;
- plate with an insulating layer using plasma-deposition;
- build a conductive layer similarly;
- etch out the unwanted interconnect using 3D laser ablation;
All of the above is doable with existing lab technology.
Regards,
T o n y
Fairy dust and a stick, with a star on it, was my Christmas wish, saves lugging around a toolbox, and thinking.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Style and grace : Nil point
Post Edited (Toby Seckshund) : 12/30/2009 10:34:37 AM GMT
-Phil
I've heard some fungi will deposit heavy metals into their cell walls, and the growth patterns for some of these are phototaxic and/or galvanotaxic.
Why not grow your next circuit?
Seriously though, there was an article about growing computers and circuits using ideas from DNA and crystals in respective solutions. Was it in Scientific American or Science Digest? It seems it would take time to develop this technology and crystal growing techniques are somewhat limited. It could be a future project though, to grow some simple pathways on dimensional printed circuit substrates, and components. I am sure someone is already working on this. [noparse]:)[/noparse]
Certainly the Cray put new ideas into actual use, and reducing wire length was a critical and important aspect of gaining speed. Nothing says that will be the important and critical aspect of using a Propeller chip. The prop has other features and attributes. I think everyone knows that prop speed by itself is not going to set a supercomputer speed record today. However, consider hybrid technology where the sum of the two techniques is greater than the one.
Although one could go the CAD route in three dimensional etching "routering" techniques for manufacturing and repeatability with precision, and even though it is possible to cheaply go with a store bought substrate and a paint-on copper clad kit so to speak, the idea came up for a less expensive approach. After some prudent shopping, there are a number of products with compounded curves, cubes, spheres, toroidal cores, etc. that are pre-made can be purchased off the shelf cheaply. The circuit pathways can be localized to a smaller point and affixed to the curve. A hole can be drilled from the obverse side to feed through and in that way, reflectance etc. can honor the original pathways and the curved surface. If the islands are reduced toward infinitesimally small sizes, layered or whatever, high densities can be achieved.
I have one project to complete and may begin a prototype of this to show a working model. Building it is one thing, programming it in Assembler is another. How is your prop assembler programming skill?
Ha I can answer that for myself..........NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!
Wow.......I thought I got deep into projects.........
(background check here......my wife says I always dive way to deep into the small interests I get into. She says I take a small project and turn it into a life long adventure, studying the past, present and future of things remotely relevant to what I'm working on. She states, "that's why you learn a lot but finish little.")
James L
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
James L
Partner/Designer
Lil Brother SMT Assembly Services
Are you addicted to technology or Micro-controllers..... then checkout the forums at Savage Circuits. Learn to build your own Gizmos!
What is funny.......after 16 years (wow....funny she put up with me that long), she now knows how to "steer" me in a direction to get results.
I have to say......she is quite intelligent for someone who is not technology minded. I got her a Stamp education kit for her birthday. She is reluctant to get past the "hello world!" part.
I try to push her (gently) but she isn't moving much on it. I remind her every now and then to see if more progress could be made. It hasn't worked yet.
I should enlist people from here to inspire her. I don't want her to do anything but enjoy herself. She has a great mind.
James L
Now back on topic.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
James L
Partner/Designer
Lil Brother SMT Assembly Services
Are you addicted to technology or Micro-controllers..... then checkout the forums at Savage Circuits. Learn to build your own Gizmos!
While we can connect computing nodes in a variety of architectures (arrays, cubes, hypercubes, etc) to produce supercomputers we are unfortunately limited to building them in 3 dimensions. That means our interconnect wiring may get rather long as the number of computers increases.
As much as I like the prop (awesome chip for I/O and control tasks) I would not use it if I were to spend the time, money, and effort to design a supercomputer of any kind. Probably one of the graphics GPU's, an Intel/AMD/or similar chip and 1 to 4 gig of ram per node.
I'm hearing you, but I think you are starting in the wrong place. The magnificent ideas you have for warping the circuit boards in such a manner to accommodate
a specific supercomputer array of prop chips is sort of like making the wagon faster and more durable when there are already more highly advanced automobiles
in the world. The designs you are considering will no doubt be incorporated someday at the silicon or crystal level. The will be put into form on a microscopic plane
and not so much the large component level that you are speaking of.
Basically it was a plastic substrate (that could be any shape) with the tracks laid on it (sort of like tin foil wrapped around a mould) then you encase the whole thing in plastic again.
So you could do a lens or a ball or some sort of weird plastic impeller with truly embedded electronics.
follow the link to see more...www.abc.net.au/tv/newinventors/txt/s2616421.htm
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
=================
The future is in our hands.
Which way to the future?
=================
Happy New Year, ErNa
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
cmapspublic3.ihmc.us:80/servlet/SBReadResourceServlet?rid=1181572927203_421963583_5511&partName=htmltext
Hello Rest Of The World
Hello Debris
Install a propeller and blow them away
...the idea of an arrangement of PCB tiles into some platonic solid, say an icosahedron, with a Prop sitting in the middle of each facet surrounded by multi coloured LEDs, sensors and shining polished ground plane like some demented Sputnik is starting to appeal to me.
Lets see, 20 Props at 10 euro each plus sensors, LEDS and PCBs....nah not going to happen here.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
For me, the past is not over yet.
p.s. How could I ever imagine to emulate a z80 on a prop?
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
cmapspublic3.ihmc.us:80/servlet/SBReadResourceServlet?rid=1181572927203_421963583_5511&partName=htmltext
Hello Rest Of The World
Hello Debris
Install a propeller and blow them away