Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Parallax SX Price Increase - Page 2 — Parallax Forums

Parallax SX Price Increase

2»

Comments

  • datacpsdatacps Posts: 139
    edited 2008-11-27 03:51
    The price increase is ok with me.. I am here and use the chip because of the support I get from the great members on this site.. I am and will always be a loyal customer. Thank you Bean and everyone else who have given me support. This is still the greatest site. I can do so much with the chip and help of the members here. Happy Thanksgiving everyone...
  • unebonnevieunebonnevie Posts: 20
    edited 2008-11-28 07:47
    Someone mentioned of a tiny propeller with 2 or 3 cores...That's a great idea! It's the same thing that ATMEL does for its ATMEGA series and it ATTiny series.

    I am newbie and started with MCU a couple months back. I actually started reading about parallax's products, the Propeller and all. Great stuff...Then I got to read about AVR. They are cheap. An ATMEGA8, with 8K flash and some eeprom and sram costs about $2 a piece. (Sorry I don't mean to advertise, but I get my ATMEGA8 from eBay for $9 for 5 pieces, free shipping, from China/Hong Kong. But it's worth the wait of 2 weeks. smile.gif So, I have not used the SX, but sure like its being able to go up to 75Mhz, unless most AVR chips.

    Anyway, I would love to see the Tiny Propeller version. smile.gif
  • william chanwilliam chan Posts: 1,326
    edited 2008-11-29 03:35
    Seems like TI is also jumping on the bandwagon by introducing their Piccolo chips which is also a scaled down version of their
    previous 32 bit real-time processor for a target price of $2 to $8 depending on number of IOs.

    www.ti.com/corp/docs/landing/f280xx-piccolo/index.htm

    To speed up time to market, there should be no changes whatsoever to the silicon when creating tinyProp,
    except to disable some cogs. : )

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    www.fd.com.my
    www.mercedes.com.my
  • RickBRickB Posts: 395
    edited 2008-11-29 06:18
    unebonnevie:

    All AVRs are single core devices. Where did you come up with the multiple core nonsense?
  • ZootZoot Posts: 2,227
    edited 2008-11-29 14:37
    I think unebonnevie is referring to the general notion of producing a "small" version of an existing chip, not a multi-core AVR per se. But hoo, this thread seems to have turned into a wish-list...

    To come full circle, if the future of the SX is potentially an issue, I would love to hear from Ken (or anyone else at Parallax) about how this might also affect the price and future of the Stamp... or rather, would Parallax at some point need to contemplate porting the Stamp firmware to a new platform if the SX goes bye-bye (I believe all the Stamps except the BS1 and vanilla BS2 are SX based). Ditto other boards like the Ping, etc, that use on-board SXes.

    ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. -- HST

    1uffakind.com/robots/povBitMapBuilder.php
    1uffakind.com/robots/resistorLadder.php
Sign In or Register to comment.