SX/B SHIFTOUT for multiple cascaded SPI type chips (A6821 or 74HC595, etc.) que
I tried looking but did not see anything relating (for SX/B) on how to cascade SPI chips that work like a 74HC595. I see in the Stampworks for BS2 that a 10K resistor is sinked between LOAD (pin 12 I believe)·and Ground. Is this still needed for cascading SPI chips on the SX-28?
The BS2 PBASIC SHIFTOUT command appears to allow for long strings of data from 1 SHIFTOUT command. It looks like SX/B only allows for 8 bits (default) to up to 16 bits.
I have (5) A6821 chips (for LED Matrix modules) which are cascaded (DO --> DI, etc.). These·SPI type chips work very much like 74HC595's. Since I have 5 of these, I would need to send·40 bits out. How can this be done? Currently I have to use (5) (8 bits at a time),·SHIFTOUT statments. Is there anyway to make it simpler to send the·40 bits·out without having to break them up into 5 separate bytes?
Hopefully I am being clear. But I will post the working 5 SHIFTOUT statement version.
Thanks.
Post Edited (T&E Engineer) : 10/14/2007 2:09:28 PM GMT
The BS2 PBASIC SHIFTOUT command appears to allow for long strings of data from 1 SHIFTOUT command. It looks like SX/B only allows for 8 bits (default) to up to 16 bits.
I have (5) A6821 chips (for LED Matrix modules) which are cascaded (DO --> DI, etc.). These·SPI type chips work very much like 74HC595's. Since I have 5 of these, I would need to send·40 bits out. How can this be done? Currently I have to use (5) (8 bits at a time),·SHIFTOUT statments. Is there anyway to make it simpler to send the·40 bits·out without having to break them up into 5 separate bytes?
Hopefully I am being clear. But I will post the working 5 SHIFTOUT statement version.
Thanks.
Post Edited (T&E Engineer) : 10/14/2007 2:09:28 PM GMT
Comments
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
www.mikronauts.com - a new blog about microcontrollers
What you said is what I have currently running.
SUB OUT
· SHIFTOUT DataIn, Clock, MSBFIRST, pattern(5) ' send the bits
· SHIFTOUT DataIn, Clock, MSBFIRST, pattern(4) ' send the bits
· SHIFTOUT DataIn, Clock, MSBFIRST, pattern(3) ' send the bits
· SHIFTOUT DataIn, Clock, MSBFIRST, pattern(2) ' send the bits
· SHIFTOUT DataIn, Clock, MSBFIRST, pattern(1) ' send the bits
· PULSOUT Strobe, 1···························· ' transfer to outputs
ENDSUB
Yes I also have the /OE lines tied low too.
???
Update:· 6 of one and a half-dozen of the other?· I guess your end-game is a 40-bit stream?
Post Edited (PJ Allen) : 10/15/2007 12:24:09 AM GMT
I did not have enough current using·my Parallax Professional Development Board (PDB) so this is why I was not seeing the correct output. /OE on each of the (10) A6821 is used to control the color (red, green or yellow) of each of the (5) 8x8 LED Matrix Modules. When I wired the SX-28 on a separate solderless breadboard and connected the external display board with A6821s to the solderless breadboard, I used my big 5vdc 20A power supply and then saw the LEDs come on correctly. I wrote a change to turn all the LEDs on and measured 2.3 Amps of current draw (then changed it back to the normal program). Before on the PDB, the power supply is only 1 Amp I beleive, and the LEDs were either the wrong color or not on at all on some of the LED Matrix Modules. The lack of current was affecting the /OE lines and probably more.
Since the (40) columns are controlled by Clock, DataIn and Latch to the (10) A6821s, this is where I thought the scanning routine should be for marquee scrolling (right to left). The (8) rows (up·to down) would then have the data message characters READ in. I am concerned about the duty cycle of 40 columns being scanned within an Interrupt routine (end concept). If I scan the 8 rows instead of the 40 columns, then would I not be able to shift marquee scrolling in (right to left) - if the rows are being used for scanning? Perhaps I am misunderstanding the process because I usually would scan the columns for data character·messages to be sent in from the rows (right to left). Is this right?
Anyway, I'm sure I'll have more questions...
Thanks again.
Post Edited (T&E Engineer) : 10/15/2007 11:17:16 AM GMT