Prop 'tri-state' I/O possible?
It seems having a tri-state port should be possible.
It needs to be as fast as possible, so will have to be in assembly.
Is there a way write to an OUTA register, even though the 'port' is in the Input direction?___ And, once a 'select' occurs, to change directions and have the port Data presented in less than 9 clock cycles (WAITPEQ plus a MOVx maybe)?___ (I've not yet gotten into Prop assembly coding, and am just studying other assembly code to understand what's needed to 'call' assembly from Spin.)
It seems one could have a 'masked' value ready to change direction to Output right after the WAITPEQ.
In assembly this would be 5 + 4 = 9 clock times; at 80 MHz, for 112.5 nsec to output to bus. Would like it much shorter, really. Is there any 'tricks' to do it faster?___
Another question, when actually does a change of direction occur or an output value get output, say for a 4 clock instruction; on the beginning of the 4th, or at the end? (Wish the Prop 'data sheet' were available
Anyone yet needed to work with an effective tri-state bus (say 8-bits)? Any help here would be highly appreciated.![yeah.gif](http://forums.parallax.com/images/smilies/yeah.gif)
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn
Post Edited (Harley) : 10/23/2006 6:48:04 PM GMT
![idea.gif](http://forums.parallax.com/images/smilies/idea.gif)
Is there a way write to an OUTA register, even though the 'port' is in the Input direction?___ And, once a 'select' occurs, to change directions and have the port Data presented in less than 9 clock cycles (WAITPEQ plus a MOVx maybe)?___ (I've not yet gotten into Prop assembly coding, and am just studying other assembly code to understand what's needed to 'call' assembly from Spin.)
It seems one could have a 'masked' value ready to change direction to Output right after the WAITPEQ.
In assembly this would be 5 + 4 = 9 clock times; at 80 MHz, for 112.5 nsec to output to bus. Would like it much shorter, really. Is there any 'tricks' to do it faster?___
Another question, when actually does a change of direction occur or an output value get output, say for a 4 clock instruction; on the beginning of the 4th, or at the end? (Wish the Prop 'data sheet' were available
Anyone yet needed to work with an effective tri-state bus (say 8-bits)? Any help here would be highly appreciated.
![yeah.gif](http://forums.parallax.com/images/smilies/yeah.gif)
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn
Post Edited (Harley) : 10/23/2006 6:48:04 PM GMT
Comments
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Paul Baker
Propeller Applications Engineer
Parallax, Inc.
I'm working on compiling this sort of information; Paul's description of the pipeline stages here is the closest we've come so far.
I am scopeless at the moment, unfortunately, so I'm having to be creative (e.g. run two cogs with their pipelines offset by 1-3 clocks, and have one report the actions of the other).
Oooh, this strikes me as a pretty important detail for self-modifying code. Is the entire instruction fetched and buffered throughout the rest of the stages, or just the I field? In other words, which of the following two code snippets will not work as expected?
The modified instruction cannot immediately follow the modifying one. In both your examples, you'll need to add a NOP.
-Phil
My personal workaround for making the most efficient index based addressing is to do post modification like so:
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Paul Baker
Propeller Applications Engineer
Parallax, Inc.
Post Edited (Paul Baker (Parallax)) : 10/23/2006 9:25:03 PM GMT
The WAITPEQ is listed as 5+ clocks. I suppose if the match doesn't occur, then the 5th state if in effect 'jump back to same instruction' for another match test. Is that true?____
On a related aspect, if one has several events which need monitoring, I suppose that each one would require separate cogs with each having its own WAITPEQ test. This assumes there is no sequential relationship for the events; else one could chain them, assuming the sequence always occurred. Else, one would get a HANG condition?___
And, for the 4-clock OUTA instruction, I'm guessing the output state occurs at the beginning of the 'write result' phase?____
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn
One has to be careful about using WAITPxx because it will hang until the condition becomes true. If you are waiting for multiple possible events, it is best to use the WAITPNE with the mask of the pins you are interested in and the current state of those pins. That way whenever an "other than now" condition occurs, the instruction will exit and you can test to see which event occured.
Heres a major gotcha: do not set any bit in the state value that isn't set in the mask value otherwise it will hang forever, as a sure thing AND the current state with the mask before sending it to any WAITPxx instruction.
The outputs wont be affected until the next clock edge, which is after the write stage.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Paul Baker
Propeller Applications Engineer
Parallax, Inc.
Post Edited (Paul Baker (Parallax)) : 10/23/2006 9:49:29 PM GMT
I would like to setup the masks for DIRA and WAITPEQ in Spin. Can these be also referenced in the assembly code?___ Might seem like a dumb question, but haven't run across a good example, and too much newbie here. Is there a demo program which would provide a good example for such?___
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn
There are two handy method for passing masks from Spin to an assembly cog, if the values change during the execution of the cog, you must pass a pointer to thier location when you start the assembly cog via the second argument.
If they are a "write once" value that is computed prior to starting the assembly cog, you can declare and label a value after your code and before any res in your assembly code such as:
diraval··· LONG· $0000_0000
then directly assign thier value in·Spin before starting the cog like this:
diraval := $0000_0001
When the assembly cog is launched diraval will contain $0000_0001 instead of $0000_0000, so when you do
mov·dira, diraval
in your assembly code, P0 will be set to output.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Paul Baker
Propeller Applications Engineer
Parallax, Inc.
Thanks for the advice.
The assignment of pins will not change for the tri-state bus. I assume, if I wished to use A16..28 for a 8-bit tri-state bus. then I should assign
diraval := $00FF_0000
for an output.
Hopefully this doesn't change other I/O pin assignments.
I probably will want to set a mask,
mask := $00FF_0000
instead, for my application as it has to be for Input and Output port use, some DIRA stuff happening at times.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn
I'm confused. In Ch 5 (Assembly) DIRA, INA, OUTA is described under Registers, but then you can't control individual pins "...unless using the MUXx instructions."
But in the MUXx instructions they only talk about 9-bit fields. How does that give one control over 32 pins?___
I browsed the forum on assembly, but didn't recognize anything in particular.
Does anyone know of a good assembly example(s) for controlling direction, in, out?____ Hopefully one can turn from tri-state to output in less than 200 nsec.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn
A literal is when you type it in manually like #20 you will find that the propeller tool will complain if you try to use a literal greater than 9-bits in size.
You can still control individual pins with OUTA etc by using a mask it is just not as convenient as by using mux instructions.
Graham
Unfortunately I'm using port pins A16-A24. Maybe I should change my schematic to use pins A0 - A7 to make the setting and masking easier.
I don't understand the 'register' business with MUXx. Unless they are the '16 special purpose registers'.
Is there an example of how the 'destination' and 'source' fields are put to use?___ Does the MUX portion correspond to some sort of 'multiplexer'?___ I'm able to figure out most Spin instructions, but am running into 'holes' in the assembly instruction. (Must have missed that lecture!!! Ha, ha>)
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn
I read and 'heard' what you said, but still see no use for these MUX instructions operating on any but the lower 9 pins. Or, can shifting left somehow be useful?___
I guess it didn't help me much for using, say I/O 16 thru 24, sorry. What I would like to do is set an 8-bit port to tri-state, output or input, depending on the condition. With the output value already ready to be OUTA'd on the port. Too bad the assembly DIR, OUT and IN weren't like the Spin instructions.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn
This section of the "Assembly Code Examples for the Beginner" might help...
http://forums.parallax.com/showthread.php?p=603397
Once you determine a mask for the pin assigned for the job, it does not need to change.
If you want to switch between making the PIN HIGH or an INPUT
Use...
And toggle between...
And...
If you want to switch between making the PIN LOW or an INPUT
Use...
And toggle between...
And...
EDIT - PinMask can represent one pin or multiple pins
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Beau Schwabe
IC Layout Engineer
Parallax, Inc.
Post Edited (Beau Schwabe (Parallax)) : 10/24/2006 11:49:26 PM GMT
I've read that one a number of times. But that is dealing with only a 1 bit mask. I need a 8-bit mask to use A16-A24.
Possibly all the setting and shifting could be done prior to a WAITPEQ. I need to output several bytes on a bus fairly fast. I was planning to use 4 registers set up in the Output registers before calling the assembly code. When external read enables occur, the data needs to be output in much less than 200 nsec. Maybe the Prop cannot handle such! I thought after the WAITPEQ, an DIRA could be issued to place one of the 4 bytes on the bus. Like replacing a TTL -374 tristate latch with a Prop. It's getting the 'output enable' function done quickly that seems to be a huge problem.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Paul Baker
Propeller Applications Engineer
Parallax, Inc.
Looks like I can use more than a 1-bit mask. Good, combining a 8-bit mask with something similar to Beau's suggestion should work, huh?
Will implement that tomorrow.
Great, having some assistance on questions that don't yet appear in the Prop manual. I understand it would be impossible to present every possible approach in a manual.
Thanks, everyone for guidance on this area.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn
Let's say you have a long word (FOO) that you want to set up for a transfer. This assumes that only the 8 I/O pins used for the transfer (16..23) are set as outputs and that those pins have to remain as inputs until the first of 4 transfers, then have to be set back to inputs. The bus is available for the transfer when the clock is high and the data must be stable by the time the clock goes low. Hold time is minimal (the pins can be made inputs as soon as the clock goes low). The clock (for discussion) is provided on pin 24.
I think the maximum time to stable data is 4-5 clocks (100-112.5ns) from the low to high clock edge and the data pins are "tri-stated" within 4-5 clocks (100-112.5ns) of the high to low clock edge. Note that this requires that the remainder of the OUTA register is not used (for outputs) by this cog.
This is the key thing you are missing I think, register means varable. They can be special purpose or user defined.
Looking at some assembly code I was totally confused. What that was, was the 'condition' and 'effects' terms on some lines. Looked improperly indented. Wow! what a 32-bit micro provides in the way of neat, yet complex instructions with those one-line instructions with conditions and effects.
Each person who has tried to answer my questions has helped. Now it is clear WHY it is not easy to write this into a manual. And it didn't help that I'd never worked with other than more limited 8-bit micros. Such 'freedom'.
Thanks, everyone. Hopefully I won't be so stuck with Prop assembly now (= less questions.)
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn
I have a cog about ready to 'tri-state' some info.
So I added part of your suggestion. Only the compiler balks at the first FOO!?!?!
I think I have FOO properly defined elsewhere.
I get the error "Expected a constant, a unary operator. or "("." Yet the manual says the value field is a register to rotate. Guess there is loads to learn what to do correctly. Ah, the 'learning curve' effort. I tried a number of things, but the compiler still doesn't like what I do.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn
Graham
Here's the assembly portion.· Hope there's a clue here (it is slightly different than what Mike suggested).· The error flags 'statFOO' of the ROL instruction.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn
Mike
Graham
The VAR relates to hub ram, you can't access that directly with assembly code, the cog has to load the data in with rlong and then write it back with wrlong.
Basically if I cut out the declaration in the VAR section it compiled (although I also cut out all other functions so I just had the asm to avoid having to download the required objects.
So either you need to do that or you need to change the program more drastically if you really do need global access to the variable.
Graham
At one time I had commented out StatFOO in VAR, but there probably were other errors at that time and didn't notice it later. Thanks for finding the offending line. Will take a while to get a handle on all the things that have to be proper for the compiler to be 'happy'.
At least, once one can get past the compile step, then other debugging methods can be applied to verify whether what one intends if really occurring. I'll have to keep in mind these sort of conflicts for future problem solving.
I owe you one, Graham.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Harley Shanko
h.a.s. designn