SX-Key IDE v. 3.2: anybody have a programming problem?
Ken Gracey
Posts: 7,403
Hello SXers,
A key customer of mine in Australia is having some programming trouble using the SX-Key IDE 3.2. His description is as follows "using my trusty development board and SX-Key which has been in use for many years - it programs great with V3.1 but not with V3.2" and he continues on to say "it seems to have something to do with internal oscillator calibration as I can read the device ok and program it when set for an external oscillator. What happens is the program displays 'ERASING' momentarily and then 'Calibrating' for an even shorter period then the programming message goes away without an error message."
I've informed both Peter Montgomery (SX-Key IDE) and Guenther Daubach (SX-Key firmware)· but they've not heard of such a problem.
Which is why I ask this question on our own forums. Is anybody having programming difficulty with the SX-Key IDE 3.2? This is the first I have heard of such programming difficulty.
Thanks,
Ken Gracey
Parallax, Inc.
A key customer of mine in Australia is having some programming trouble using the SX-Key IDE 3.2. His description is as follows "using my trusty development board and SX-Key which has been in use for many years - it programs great with V3.1 but not with V3.2" and he continues on to say "it seems to have something to do with internal oscillator calibration as I can read the device ok and program it when set for an external oscillator. What happens is the program displays 'ERASING' momentarily and then 'Calibrating' for an even shorter period then the programming message goes away without an error message."
I've informed both Peter Montgomery (SX-Key IDE) and Guenther Daubach (SX-Key firmware)· but they've not heard of such a problem.
Which is why I ask this question on our own forums. Is anybody having programming difficulty with the SX-Key IDE 3.2? This is the first I have heard of such programming difficulty.
Thanks,
Ken Gracey
Parallax, Inc.
Comments
http://forums.parallax.com/showthread.php?p=598731
If not, then yes, other people are having the same problem.· I myself have not upgraded from V3.1 to V3.2,·so have not had·to deal with the issue·myself.
Nate
Not the same person. However, this makes two.
Anybody else?
Ken
I don't care for the smooth scroll as well as some other minor "new features" , so I continue to use 3.1
Although for a while I did use 3.2, but was switching back and forth quite a bit, so now I'm unsure if any problems were encountered.
Cheers,
Peter (pjv)
On the other hand, the program button an the menu bar always working.· An Australian thing maybe?
But compared to the 2 months·of everything I touch getting hot and emitting smoke, this is a minor detail.
Either this ends soon, or I'm hanging up my soldering iron.
bongo
I just tried it here, and as your customer said. It seem to work fine UNTIL you put in "IRC_CAL IRC_4MHZ" to do the internal calibration. Then I just get "ERASING", then briefly "CALIBRATING" then nothing.
Bean.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Cheap 4-digit LED display with driver IC·www.hc4led.com
Low power SD Data Logger www.sddatalogger.com
"You're braver than you believe, stronger than you seem, and smarter than you think" Christopher Robin to Pooh
Post Edited (Bean (Hitt Consulting)) : 8/21/2006 12:02:52 PM GMT
Sounds like Bean was able to recreate the problem...
-Dan
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
"A saint-like quantity of patience is a help, if this is unavailable, a salty vocabulary works nearly as well." - A. S. Weaver
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Think outside the BOX!
That is normal. You cannot change the baud rate.
Bean.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Cheap 4-digit LED display with driver IC·www.hc4led.com
Low power SD Data Logger www.sddatalogger.com
"You're braver than you believe, stronger than you seem, and smarter than you think" Christopher Robin to Pooh
·
Thanks,
PeterM
Thanks to everybody for contributing to the bug report, and to Peter for solving the problem.
Ken Gracey
Parallax, Inc.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Think outside the BOX!
The programming speed is a function of the time required to program the flash EEPROM on the SX chip itself. The short answer is that this will not be changing. I suggest you check out the SX simulator to test ideas quickly without needing to program a chip. If this doesn't suit you, then you'll probably need to tweak your coding style a little when working with the SX chips.
Thanks,
PeterM