Prop Manual errata submits ?
Is there an appropriate place to submit errata discovered in the Prop documentation? Not just the simple typos, but stuff that is wrong that snuck past the proofreaders?
Waiting for the elusive Chapter 3, I'm reading 1, 2 and, now, 4 very carefully (in hard copy!) so as not to miss anything.
"Case" in point: page 4-21, the CASE statement example starts out as testing X+Y, but the comments talk only about X. This gets cleared up later down the page in the narrative, but with some of the new (to me) syntax of some statements, you could puzzle a while over what turns out to be a flub.
-- Don
Waiting for the elusive Chapter 3, I'm reading 1, 2 and, now, 4 very carefully (in hard copy!) so as not to miss anything.
"Case" in point: page 4-21, the CASE statement example starts out as testing X+Y, but the comments talk only about X. This gets cleared up later down the page in the narrative, but with some of the new (to me) syntax of some statements, you could puzzle a while over what turns out to be a flub.
-- Don
Comments
-- Don
I already let them know about the one you mentioned.
There isn't an errata yet. I think they're putting all their efforts into version 1 of the manual. Now is the time to submit corrections, though, before version 1 is sent to the printer.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
OS-X: because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows
links:
My band's website
Our album on the iTunes Music Store
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Doing my part to keep the Commodore 64 alive!
http://www.commodorestuff.com
·