How To Build an RF Transmitter/Receiver
crackticus pots
Posts: 34
hay does any body know how to make a very simple and very small
radio RF radieo reciver (and a transmitter to go with it)
Post Edited By Moderator (Chris Savage (Parallax)) : 11/29/2005 4:09:15 PM GMT
radio RF radieo reciver (and a transmitter to go with it)
Post Edited By Moderator (Chris Savage (Parallax)) : 11/29/2005 4:09:15 PM GMT
Comments
and as for the car, I dont want to buy 65 cars and disasemble them.·I am trying to build a tiny inteligent senser pakage with distibutable micro sensers.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
there are a hundred types of people in the world,
but I dont have time to name them all.
Post Edited (crackticus pots) : 11/30/2005 4:21:21 PM GMT
If you plan on having one receiver and a transmitter on each remote sensor, you may (will) have problems coordinating the transmission and reception. i.e. How do you keep all the sensors from transmitting at once?
There are two ways (at least) to do this. One would be for each sensor to also have a receiver, and only send data when "polled" by the central data logger/collector/processor. Another would be to have each sensor on a different frequency/channel, but then the complexity (cost) of the receiver grows.
There are a number of RF components and technologies available, they all have different advantages/disadvantages. There are also a number of other threads in the sandbox, basic stamp and SX forums. Even if you don't plan on using an SX (or STAMP), the discussions on how to deal with RF may apply to your problem.
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
John R.
8 + 8 = 10
http://jap.hu/electronic/rf.html
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Think outside the BOX!
Assuming you're meaning data-links?
1. Data transmit: all the transmitter will transmit is a simple pulse or steady on.
2. Yes i was planning on having a transmitter and a receiver on each.
3. Medium security· (low external interference)
4. The way i plan on coordinating the transmition is the reason each sensor has a receiver. The stamp checks the receiver and if something is already transmitting it will "wait its turn" to transmit. Plus the transponders check each other for a problem (eg.battery)
Example:
A1·transmits its simple serial signal "A1" the next transponder, A2, then·A2 eknolages·A1's signal and transmits·it's signal "A2" and on and on.
but if there is a problem like if·C3 transmits "C3"·and C4 does not respond. then C3 will send "battery C4" three times just to make sure that the base station has received the signal.
but if there is a sensor tripped (say sensor number·B6)··the sensor will send "alarm B6" three times.
·
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
there are a hundred types of people in the world,
but I dont have time to name them all.
Post Edited (crackticus pots) : 2/15/2006 4:19:15 PM GMT
these are the wrong tipes of radio, these are like FM sterio transmitters a need a simple 1/0 trans mitter and reciver.
thank you though
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
there are a hundred types of people in the world,
but I dont have time to name them all.
Post Edited (crackticus pots) : 2/15/2006 4:16:01 PM GMT
Go to the page above and look for the TWS and RWS 434 transmitter and receiver modules then look at the page below for the example code for a basic stamp.
http://www.rentron.com/Stamp_RF.htm
Mike
Yikes, I just finished up an order for 178 bucks worth of sparkfun stuff. Are we having fun yet?
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Think outside the BOX!
Post Edited (metron9) : 11/30/2005 10:09:29 PM GMT