Future of Javeline
Does anyone know where the future of the javeline is headed? Any idea when we might expect to see a second version? If so, might we get to see the co-processor built into the second version? Having the co-processor built into the next version along with a higher clock-rate would definetly merrit enough changes for a second release in my book. Thoughts?
- Justin
- Justin
Comments
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Jon Williams
Applications Engineer, Parallax
Dallas, TX· USA
- Justin
I figure if going to use a stamp.. I may as well not have to learn a new language..
and anyway.. this javelin rocks.. My only hold back was that the other stamps are cheaper, but.. like I say.. the javelin rocks..
I did in 1 hour of programming (never used javelin before) what would have taken me days to build circuits for.. so I'm a happy customer and telling everybody I know about the thing.. and most of them are java programmers anyway..
Its the biggest user base and easiest to read.
I don't know how hard that would be to implement legal wise and tech wise but you
would instantly have a huge user base.
That said I believe that embedded JAVA has a future but execution speed is always a big issue in real time systems.
I think that it is a matter of time before there is more growth. During the time that you were releasing the Javelin there was an incredible marketing push for .NET and C# as an alternative to Java. I think that the pendulum is swinging a little closer to center now.
Parallax -Don't throw in the Javelin + towel yet. You may not like some of the topics in some of the threads but look at the positive. Topics regardless of orientation are a indication of interest. It seems to me that there is more interest in this microcontroller of late.
Post Edited (Singularity) : 1/22/2005 11:11:50 PM GMT
It doesn't yet have any navigation, I'm currently deciding whether I should use IR, a sonic range finder, or both. Right now I just drive it around with the debug terminal.
I did have it programmed to "follow the light" (where it would turn around in circles until it found the light, then drive toward it)
While trying to decide whether to go IR or Sonic, I'm attempting to improve its "follow the light" capabilities by adding another light sensor, but it's being quite difficult. The RCTime function is giving me very different results for both sensors, and thus making it hard to create a proper control algorithm.
I'll post more as I add more stuff to it .
Here is an earlier pic...
-Jon
Get one of the compass appmods (or ICs) and mount it to a stepper/servo on the top of the platform.· Have a boom going over the edge with a light source.· When you want to go in a particular direction, have the boom arm swing there and with the bot in spinning mode (hunting for light) then move the boom to keep in that direction...then when it finds the light, the bot moves that way, and you can steer with the light source.
Sorry, early morning, no coffee!!· And saw a cartoon in the paper with a donkey cart and the guy holding the carrott out in front of the donkey!· Thought it'd be funny!
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
·
Steve
http://members.rogers.com/steve.brady
"Inside each and every one of us is our one, true authentic swing. Something we was born with. Something that's ours and ours alone. Something that can't be learned... something that's got to be remembered."
I have posted a flash video of it on my website. You can check it out at JonKeinath.com
Tell me what you think!
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔
Jon Williams
Applications Engineer, Parallax
Dallas, TX· USA