Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
collision avoidance — Parallax Forums

collision avoidance

ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
edited 2004-02-05 01:21 in General Discussion
HI all: I have come up against a stumbling block with my robots. I have
found that the sensors I am using will not always pick up something like a
chair leg. Using the srf04, the sensor WILL pick up the chair leg, but only
when it is directly forward of the sensor. If the robot is 3 inches to the
right of the leg, the robot will drive right in between the legs of a chair.
This is not wanted of course. the GP series Ir sensors have the same problem.
The one option I foresee is expensive. Mount numerous devantech sensors on
the front of the robot. At $33 a pop this gets expensive. A 2nd option is to
have a movable sensor. This is messy and time consuming in the code of the
robot.
Many small Ir sensors are not entirely effective either. They will miss
detections also. On the plus side, they are much cheaper.
Is there any sensor system out there that is fairly cheap, and reliable?
For ten cents I can mount bumper switchs on the front and be 100% reliable,
but I wanted to avoid any mechanical means.
Thanks for any advice.
Very respectfully, your obedient servant.
Brig. Gen. Johnston Pettigrew

Admin@M...
WWW server hosting [url=Http://mntnweb.com]Http://mntnweb.com[/url]
Kerry Barlow
p.o. box 21
kirkwood ny
13795
607-775-1575

Comments

  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2004-02-04 20:57
    At 03:55 PM 2/4/04 -0500, Kerry Barlow wrote:
    >HI all: I have come up against a stumbling block with my robots. I have
    >found that the sensors I am using will not always pick up something like a
    >chair leg. Using the srf04, the sensor WILL pick up the chair leg, but only
    >when it is directly forward of the sensor. If the robot is 3 inches to the
    >right of the leg, the robot will drive right in between the legs of a chair.
    >This is not wanted of course. the GP series Ir sensors have the same problem.
    >The one option I foresee is expensive. Mount numerous devantech sensors on
    >the front of the robot. At $33 a pop this gets expensive. A 2nd option is to
    >have a movable sensor. This is messy and time consuming in the code of the
    >robot.
    >Many small Ir sensors are not entirely effective either. They will miss
    >detections also. On the plus side, they are much cheaper.
    >Is there any sensor system out there that is fairly cheap, and reliable?
    >For ten cents I can mount bumper switchs on the front and be 100% reliable,
    >but I wanted to avoid any mechanical means.
    > Thanks for any advice.
    >Very respectfully, your obedient servant.
    >Brig. Gen. Johnston Pettigrew

    Kerry -

    Use the following as a basis for your own design of a rotatable sensor, either
    I/R or sonar:
    http://www.robotstore.com/catalog/display.asp?pid=217

    Regards,

    Bruce Bates
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2004-02-05 01:21
    bruce: Thankyou. Do you know how accurate the Polaroid sensors are? I see
    they have a larger field of view then the SRF04 so that in itself is an
    advantage.
    The rotating servo mount would have to help considerably.
    -kerry


    At 03:57 PM 2/4/04 -0500, you wrote:
    >At 03:55 PM 2/4/04 -0500, Kerry Barlow wrote:
    >>HI all: I have come up against a stumbling block with my robots. I have
    >>found that the sensors I am using will not always pick up something like a
    >>chair leg. Using the srf04, the sensor WILL pick up the chair leg, but only
    >>when it is directly forward of the sensor. If the robot is 3 inches to the
    >>right of the leg, the robot will drive right in between the legs of a chair.
    >>This is not wanted of course. the GP series Ir sensors have the same problem.
    >>The one option I foresee is expensive. Mount numerous devantech sensors on
    >>the front of the robot. At $33 a pop this gets expensive. A 2nd option is to
    >>have a movable sensor. This is messy and time consuming in the code of the
    >>robot.
    >>Many small Ir sensors are not entirely effective either. They will miss
    >>detections also. On the plus side, they are much cheaper.
    >>Is there any sensor system out there that is fairly cheap, and reliable?
    >>For ten cents I can mount bumper switchs on the front and be 100% reliable,
    >>but I wanted to avoid any mechanical means.
    >> Thanks for any advice.
    >>Very respectfully, your obedient servant.
    >>Brig. Gen. Johnston Pettigrew
    >
    >Kerry -
    >
    >Use the following as a basis for your own design of a rotatable sensor,
    either I/R or sonar:
    > http://www.robotstore.com/catalog/display.asp?pid=217
    >
    >Regards,
    >
    >Bruce Bates
    >
    >
    >
    >To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    >from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    >Yahoo! Groups Links
    >
    >To visit your group on the web, go to:
    > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/basicstamps/
    >
    >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    >
    >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
    >
    Very respectfully, your obedient servant.
    Brig. Gen. Johnston Pettigrew

    Admin@M...
    WWW server hosting [url=Http://mntnweb.com]Http://mntnweb.com[/url]
    Kerry Barlow
    p.o. box 21
    kirkwood ny
    13795
    607-775-1575
Sign In or Register to comment.