Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
PBASIC 2.5 resource — Parallax Forums

PBASIC 2.5 resource

ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
edited 2003-10-14 06:03 in General Discussion
I like PBASIC 2.5 a lot, thanks Parallax, thanks Jeff!

I've put up a reference web page that shows in detail how the new
control structures like DO-LOOP, IF-THEN-ELSEIF-ELSE-ENDIF, etc.
translate into the old PBASIC. Stampers might find this helpful, in
order to understand exactly how the new commands work, or when there
is need to optimize code for speed or size.

http://www.emesystems.com/BS2pbasic25.htm

BTW, there may be some confusion about where to get PBASIC 2.5. Look
on http://www.parallax.com and click on downloads and then software.
Get the Stamp Windows editor verison 2.0 beta 2.1. It is a mishmash
of numbers, but that is where you find the PBASIC 2.5 language.

-- best regards
Tracy Allen
electronically monitored ecosystems
http://www.emesystems.com
mailto:tracy@e...

Comments

  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-10-13 17:40
    Ani idea when a written manual will be available for the new version....or
    when the new version will no longer be a "beta" version (full release version!)?


    [noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-10-13 18:18
    We are still actively working on the beta version (right now we're
    integrating the BS1) and when that is finished the final will be
    released. The manual is also being updated, but of necessity, requires
    the software to be completed (or fully stable ) before it can be
    completed.

    That said, the beta release does have an updated help file and any
    syntax questions you may have are covered in it.

    -- Jon Williams
    -- Applications Engineer, Parallax
    -- Dallas Office


    Original Message
    From: azeasi@a... [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=9I1nmdLZVXXr9Dw7CJzfkuPWHcQ5XMnkBci8HNpHCGwab63pykn7z_obOG3h1XHcKfK7Gj3dAGw]azeasi@a...[/url
    Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:41 AM
    To: basicstamps@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] PBASIC 2.5 resource


    Ani idea when a written manual will be available for the new
    version....or
    when the new version will no longer be a "beta" version (full release
    version!)?


    [noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


    To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject
    and Body of the message will be ignored.


    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




    This message has been scanned by WebShield. Please report SPAM to
    abuse@p....
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-10-13 22:34
    From: <azeasi@a...>
    Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] PBASIC 2.5 resource


    > Ani idea when a written manual will be available for the new version....or
    > when the new version will no longer be a "beta" version (full release
    version!)?
    >

    Not to preempt Jon answering those questions, but let me reassure those who
    haven't taken the plunge that the current beta is extremely solid. I just
    got into Stamps about a month ago and downloaded the beta for use from the
    outset. I had installed the full-release version just in case, but I finally
    deleted it when I saw no point in keeping it.

    You always must be willing to take precautions against unexpected lock-ups
    with beta code, but to be honest I do that with all code. And I've had no
    such yet. The PBasic 2.5 language features alone are worth a few precautions
    to me, but I also understand significant improvements were made in the
    functions of the editor itself, and the built-in help is smoothly integrated
    and comprehensive already. (Although I understand some explanations are
    still being edited, and others expanded with additional app notes.)

    Unless you have a corporate policy, or personal phobia, that precludes using
    beta products, I'd download the beta and give it a try for several days.
    I'll bet you'll be hooked quickly.

    Gary
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-10-14 06:03
    I agree with Gary that the IDE, and in my own experience the new IDE
    is very stable despite being beta. Worth getting. The documentation
    in the help files, and in pdfs that accompany the download, are quite
    thorough. You can print out the pdfs and keep them with the manual.

    Now that I program mostly the BS2pe, I have quite a different style
    with that than I used to with the BS2 and its hard 2k limit. I can
    use the new PBASIC structures and not worry too much about trimming
    every fat bit out of the code. But there are other reasons to trim,
    to code for speed of response. Or still, to pack in that code in one
    bank. That is why I did that page on "inside the PBASIC 2.5
    commands". <http://www.emesystems.com/BS2pbasic25.htm>


    -- Tracy



    >From: <azeasi@a...>
    >Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] PBASIC 2.5 resource
    >
    > > Ani idea when a written manual will be available for the new version....or
    >> when the new version will no longer be a "beta" version (full release
    >version!)?
    >>
    >
    >Not to preempt Jon answering those questions, but let me reassure those who
    >haven't taken the plunge that the current beta is extremely solid. I just
    >got into Stamps about a month ago and downloaded the beta for use from the
    >outset. I had installed the full-release version just in case, but I finally
    >deleted it when I saw no point in keeping it.
    >
    >You always must be willing to take precautions against unexpected lock-ups
    >with beta code, but to be honest I do that with all code. And I've had no
    >such yet. The PBasic 2.5 language features alone are worth a few precautions
    >to me, but I also understand significant improvements were made in the
    >functions of the editor itself, and the built-in help is smoothly integrated
    >and comprehensive already. (Although I understand some explanations are
    >still being edited, and others expanded with additional app notes.)
    >
    >Unless you have a corporate policy, or personal phobia, that precludes using
    >beta products, I'd download the beta and give it a try for several days.
    >I'll bet you'll be hooked quickly.
    >
    >Gary
Sign In or Register to comment.