Real Time Clock Question
Archiver
Posts: 46,084
Any one know of a real time clock chip that has an output variable of less than
1 second?
i.e. tenths/hundredths etc...
And how realistic is it to be able to use this with a BS2?
I'm looking at a data logger running at ideally 20Hz sampling about a dozen
bytes...
Cheers very much all,
Kev/.
[noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
1 second?
i.e. tenths/hundredths etc...
And how realistic is it to be able to use this with a BS2?
I'm looking at a data logger running at ideally 20Hz sampling about a dozen
bytes...
Cheers very much all,
Kev/.
[noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Comments
The PCF8385 will do the trick.
Down to 100th of a second timekeeping. Only catch is, it is I2C.
The BS2 does not have I2C built in, but you can easily "Bit Bash"
a solution.
Visit
http://www.lennard.net.nz/lennardelectronics/electronics/i2c.html
#rtc for an idea on how to use the chip. I think I used a BS2sx for
this example for some reason, but it also works OK on a BS2.
Of course, I'd actually use a BS2pe if I were you, esp if you are
serious on a Datalogging application. The BS2pe also has built
in I2C Commands, therefore no Bit Bashing required.
cheers,
Ben,
Windy (and friggin' cold) Wellington, NZ (winter has FINALLY
arrived!)
--- In basicstamps@yahoogroups.com, "Kev Pearce
\(kevp.com\)" <email.me@k...> wrote:
> Any one know of a real time clock chip that has an output
variable of less than 1 second?
> i.e. tenths/hundredths etc...
>
> And how realistic is it to be able to use this with a BS2?
>
> I'm looking at a data logger running at ideally 20Hz sampling
about a dozen bytes...
>
> Cheers very much all,
>
>
> Kev/.
>
> [noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
The philips PCF8583 (I2C bus) has hundredth of seconds. With a Bs2P with its
builtin I2C commands
You should be able to read this device several times per second.
If seconds resolution is enough you can consider DS1207 (SPI) or DS1302
(I2C).
Also nice is a Xicor X1227 (I2C, seconds resolution, dual alarm, builtin 4K
eeprom,
1.75 seconds watchdog timer).
Regards peter
Oorspronkelijk bericht
Van: Kev Pearce (kevp.com) [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=L-sDuKwIsXDUs4hwu3k6n0TwzFnzECqE9f3bLWDauIsZ1aln_VE1tIDBAO3YXRT6GuWhAixWftgi-Lo]email.me@k...[/url
Verzonden: vrijdag 11 juli 2003 13:27
Aan: basicstamps@yahoogroups.com
Onderwerp: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Real Time Clock Question
Any one know of a real time clock chip that has an output variable of less
than 1 second?
i.e. tenths/hundredths etc...
And how realistic is it to be able to use this with a BS2?
I'm looking at a data logger running at ideally 20Hz sampling about a dozen
bytes...
Cheers very much all,
Kev/.
[noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
Body of the message will be ignored.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
own sort of communications. Closer to SPI with a bi-directional I/O pin
instead of MISO/MOSI.
The DS1307 is real I2C
Original Message
From: "peter verkaik" <peterverkaik@b...>
To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 6:55 AM
Subject: RE: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Real Time Clock Question
> Hi,
>
> The philips PCF8583 (I2C bus) has hundredth of seconds. With a Bs2P with
its
> builtin I2C commands
> You should be able to read this device several times per second.
> If seconds resolution is enough you can consider DS1207 (SPI) or DS1302
> (I2C).
> Also nice is a Xicor X1227 (I2C, seconds resolution, dual alarm, builtin
4K
> eeprom,
> 1.75 seconds watchdog timer).
>
> Regards peter
>
>
>
Oorspronkelijk bericht
> Van: Kev Pearce (kevp.com) [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=oJJycOsNjypjDwF7tbZJOcL_alpkFPxbUsDpCk4fJ_NiG2eR1eBMwCadfnxJKxsCPvGpQ5F-yLoEeJ-c]email.me@k...[/url
> Verzonden: vrijdag 11 juli 2003 13:27
> Aan: basicstamps@yahoogroups.com
> Onderwerp: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Real Time Clock Question
>
> Any one know of a real time clock chip that has an output variable of less
> than 1 second?
> i.e. tenths/hundredths etc...
>
> And how realistic is it to be able to use this with a BS2?
>
> I'm looking at a data logger running at ideally 20Hz sampling about a
dozen
> bytes...
>
> Cheers very much all,
>
>
> Kev/.
>
> [noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
> basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
> Body of the message will be ignored.
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
> basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
Body of the message will be ignored.
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
I took a look at the xicor website.
The X1286 offers hundredth of a seconds plus 256K of builtin eeprom (I2C
bus).
No watchdog timer. The X1288 includes a watchdog timer.
So Kev, you can have a single chip for both of your needs.
http://www.xicor.com/folders/X1288.php
regards peter
Oorspronkelijk bericht
Van: pm [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=veyrJMzt5Exe1ahL4ONIXto-4GNC6N9VzcbGU51mCCuweKRpmmhus-6putbvWJ1rpN85GUWAAaHP]pmeloy@s...[/url
Verzonden: vrijdag 11 juli 2003 21:12
Aan: basicstamps@yahoogroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Real Time Clock Question
Bit of a correction, the DS1302 isn't I2C, its three wire serial using its
own sort of communications. Closer to SPI with a bi-directional I/O pin
instead of MISO/MOSI.
The DS1307 is real I2C
Original Message
From: "peter verkaik" <peterverkaik@b...>
To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 6:55 AM
Subject: RE: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Real Time Clock Question
> Hi,
>
> The philips PCF8583 (I2C bus) has hundredth of seconds. With a Bs2P with
its
> builtin I2C commands
> You should be able to read this device several times per second.
> If seconds resolution is enough you can consider DS1207 (SPI) or DS1302
> (I2C).
> Also nice is a Xicor X1227 (I2C, seconds resolution, dual alarm, builtin
4K
> eeprom,
> 1.75 seconds watchdog timer).
>
> Regards peter
>
>
>
Oorspronkelijk bericht
> Van: Kev Pearce (kevp.com) [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=2RGYSWR5oLJAwYkcg9xlf5_IZWXfAWDPKYZx8Y-uXSyDaWc5TJGvuR-TYcLRbz1X9Mdck9r22M5oag]email.me@k...[/url
> Verzonden: vrijdag 11 juli 2003 13:27
> Aan: basicstamps@yahoogroups.com
> Onderwerp: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Real Time Clock Question
>
> Any one know of a real time clock chip that has an output variable of less
> than 1 second?
> i.e. tenths/hundredths etc...
>
> And how realistic is it to be able to use this with a BS2?
>
> I'm looking at a data logger running at ideally 20Hz sampling about a
dozen
> bytes...
>
> Cheers very much all,
>
>
> Kev/.
>
> [noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
> basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
> Body of the message will be ignored.
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
> basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
Body of the message will be ignored.
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
Body of the message will be ignored.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/