Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Ultrasonic vaporization — Parallax Forums

Ultrasonic vaporization

ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
edited 2003-05-29 14:09 in General Discussion
Hi!

I've been looking everywhere for information on this topic and it
seems to be scarce.

Has anyone used ultrasonic waves to vaporize various liquids? I'm
really interested in creating a BS2-based vaporizer.

This sounds like something that someone else has probably tried, so I
wanted to ask before reinventing the wheel!

Thanks,
Derek

Comments

  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-05-27 03:59
    I've seen app's where they keep things vaporized in sealed chambers using RF
    which could include Ultrasonic.

    Larry Gaminde


    Original Message
    From: "neuroburp" <parallax@b...>
    To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: May 26, 2003 4:31 PM
    Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Ultrasonic vaporization


    > Hi!
    >
    > I've been looking everywhere for information on this topic and it
    > seems to be scarce.
    >
    > Has anyone used ultrasonic waves to vaporize various liquids? I'm
    > really interested in creating a BS2-based vaporizer.
    >
    > This sounds like something that someone else has probably tried, so I
    > wanted to ask before reinventing the wheel!
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Derek
    >
    >
    >
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-05-27 15:59
    Well I've never done this with a stamp, but I was at one of those home and
    garden stores and I ran across these for sale. I picked one up, works well.
    It's meant for fountains to add a fog over the fountain. If you want a
    cheap ultrasonic vaporizer run out and pick up a cheap visible mist
    humidifier and hack it, they use this technique to vaporize the water.

    As for how it actually works... I read it some where once.. can't remember
    where, but I'll have a look and see if I can find the information again.

    Chris Shuster

    Original Message
    From: "neuroburp" <parallax@b...>
    To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 7:31 AM
    Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Ultrasonic vaporization


    > Hi!
    >
    > I've been looking everywhere for information on this topic and it
    > seems to be scarce.
    >
    > Has anyone used ultrasonic waves to vaporize various liquids? I'm
    > really interested in creating a BS2-based vaporizer.
    >
    > This sounds like something that someone else has probably tried, so I
    > wanted to ask before reinventing the wheel!
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Derek
    >
    >
    >
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
    >
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-05-27 17:16
    If you are going to be breathing the mist, you need to use distilled or
    filtered water. The minerals in tap water will be dispersed as well, which
    can cause respiratory problems as well as dust all over everything.

    Original Message

    > Well I've never done this with a stamp, but I was at one of those home and
    > garden stores and I ran across these for sale. I picked one up, works
    well.
    > It's meant for fountains to add a fog over the fountain. If you want a
    > cheap ultrasonic vaporizer run out and pick up a cheap visible mist
    > humidifier and hack it, they use this technique to vaporize the water.
    >
    > As for how it actually works... I read it some where once.. can't remember
    > where, but I'll have a look and see if I can find the information again.
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-05-28 14:52
    Interesting I never even thought of that, I've had visible mist humidifiers
    for ages (since I live in dry Colorado) and have been filling them off tap
    water... thanks for the advice Rodent.

    Original Message
    From: "Rodent" <daweasel@s...>
    To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:16 AM
    Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Ultrasonic vaporization


    > If you are going to be breathing the mist, you need to use distilled or
    > filtered water. The minerals in tap water will be dispersed as well, which
    > can cause respiratory problems as well as dust all over everything.
    >
    >
    Original Message
    >
    > > Well I've never done this with a stamp, but I was at one of those home
    and
    > > garden stores and I ran across these for sale. I picked one up, works
    > well.
    > > It's meant for fountains to add a fog over the fountain. If you want a
    > > cheap ultrasonic vaporizer run out and pick up a cheap visible mist
    > > humidifier and hack it, they use this technique to vaporize the water.
    > >
    > > As for how it actually works... I read it some where once.. can't
    remember
    > > where, but I'll have a look and see if I can find the information again.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
    >
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-05-29 01:39
    It should tell you that on the box somewhere -- I think that's where I saw
    it. That or Consumer Reports.

    Original Message

    > Interesting I never even thought of that, I've had visible mist
    humidifiers
    > for ages (since I live in dry Colorado) and have been filling them off tap
    > water...

    > > If you are going to be breathing the mist, you need to use distilled or
    > > filtered water. The minerals in tap water will be dispersed as well,
    which
    > > can cause respiratory problems as well as dust all over everything.
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-05-29 04:17
    --- In basicstamps@yahoogroups.com, "Rodent" <daweasel@s...> wrote:
    > If you are going to be breathing the mist, you need to use
    distilled or
    > filtered water. The minerals in tap water will be dispersed as
    well, which
    > can cause respiratory problems as well as dust all over everything.
    >

    Yeah, that's pretty weird! I would have never guessed that it could
    be harmful to disperse minerals!?! I found a site, during my
    searching, where a doctor was giving that advice as well.

    Actually, my intended goal (after much experimentation with water) is
    to vaporize standard unleaded gasoline in an attempt to make a more
    efficient carburetor for increased gas mileage. I hope the "men in
    black" don't come and get me! [noparse]:)[/noparse]

    I considered playing around with one of those foggers from a
    fountain, as you described, but I read elsewhere that different
    liquids require different frequencies to actually vaporize. That's
    why I was looking for more generic information. It's almost as
    though it's a secret, or something!

    I'm basically trying to find a more high-tech approach to the system
    that is being sold on the Eagle-Research web site. It's a small
    canister that keeps a float-controlled amount of liquid gasoline in
    the bottom and uses the engine's vacuume to pull air up through the
    liquid gasoline via tiny bubblers, yeilding pure vapor. The idea is
    that only gasoline vapor is combustible, so traditional carburetion
    and fuel injection waste liquid gasoline that ends up getting burned
    off in your catalytic converter. Here's the URL, in case you're
    interested:

    http://www.eagle-research.com/fuelsav/hy2a.html

    Still, I have that odd feeling that I get whenever I have a new
    idea... "Someone else must have tried this before." So, I feel like
    I should keep looking before I kill myself when I accidentally find
    the secret to spontaneous human combustion, or something! Haha...

    -Derek
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-05-29 04:33

    Original Message
    From: "neuroburp" <parallax@b...>

    > Actually, my intended goal (after much experimentation with water) is
    > to vaporize standard unleaded gasoline in an attempt to make a more
    > efficient carburetor for increased gas mileage. I hope the "men in
    > black" don't come and get me! [noparse]:)[/noparse]

    YIPES!
    Sounds dangerous! I just wanted to check if you are aware how dangerous
    vaporized gas is? I know you're probably aware of this, but I don't want to
    read about you on the darwin awards website...
    I don't think vaporized gas is exactly hypergolic, but it's real close!
    Please be careful...

    - Robert :O)
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-05-29 06:06
    >
    > YIPES!
    > Sounds dangerous! I just wanted to check if you are aware how
    dangerous
    > vaporized gas is? I know you're probably aware of this, but I don't
    want to
    > read about you on the darwin awards website...
    > I don't think vaporized gas is exactly hypergolic, but it's real
    close!
    > Please be careful...
    >
    > - Robert :O)

    Oh yeah!! I've had worries about that myself, so that's why I'd
    start with water! [noparse]:)[/noparse] I'm sure that I'd have a LONG extension cord
    connected to any "live" tests... Of course, with the lack of
    information on this subject, I'll probably never have to worry!

    If it does turn out to be a hypergolic reaction, I may have to create
    a very closed chamber which then forces the gas directly into the
    intake manifold, or even vaporize the gas as it enters each valve
    intake. I'm sure that I'd have a heat problem with the transducers
    at that point which would ruin everything. I keep telling myself
    that if it's such a good idea, vehicle manufacturers would already be
    doing it. Still, I've seen lots of other ideas I've had suddenly hit
    the market because someone else was proactive enough to run with
    them...

    -Derek
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-05-29 13:01
    It seems I have seen a similar unit in a harbor freight catalog. This unit
    just clamps to the incoming fuel line or something. I don't have a catalog
    handy but will report back if I can find it.


    >
    > YIPES!
    > Sounds dangerous! I just wanted to check if you are aware how
    dangerous
    > vaporized gas is? I know you're probably aware of this, but I don't
    want to
    > read about you on the darwin awards website...
    > I don't think vaporized gas is exactly hypergolic, but it's real
    close!
    > Please be careful...
    >
    > - Robert :O)

    Oh yeah!! I've had worries about that myself, so that's why I'd
    start with water! [noparse]:)[/noparse] I'm sure that I'd have a LONG extension cord
    connected to any "live" tests... Of course, with the lack of
    information on this subject, I'll probably never have to worry!

    If it does turn out to be a hypergolic reaction, I may have to create
    a very closed chamber which then forces the gas directly into the
    intake manifold, or even vaporize the gas as it enters each valve
    intake. I'm sure that I'd have a heat problem with the transducers
    at that point which would ruin everything. I keep telling myself
    that if it's such a good idea, vehicle manufacturers would already be
    doing it. Still, I've seen lots of other ideas I've had suddenly hit
    the market because someone else was proactive enough to run with
    them...

    -Derek



    To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    Body of the message will be ignored.


    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-05-29 13:15
    Nope. Those were the magnet things. Goes with the magnetic bracelets and the
    plastic hose clamp / magnet thingies they sell to prolong your life.

    My old physics teacher, whom I had during the gas crisis back in the 70's,
    said if you took all the products that claimed to save gas and put them on
    one car, you would have to stop every 10 miles to drain the gas tank.

    Original Message

    > It seems I have seen a similar unit in a harbor freight catalog. This
    unit
    > just clamps to the incoming fuel line or something. I don't have a
    catalog
    > handy but will report back if I can find it.

    > > Sounds dangerous! I just wanted to check if you are aware how
    > dangerous
    > > vaporized gas is? I know you're probably aware of this, but I don't
    > want to
    > > read about you on the darwin awards website...
    > > I don't think vaporized gas is exactly hypergolic, but it's real
    > close!
    > > Please be careful...
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2003-05-29 14:09
    That's why I didn't spend much time looking. These go in the same category
    as other automotive 'wonders'. But for only $19.95............


    Nope. Those were the magnet things. Goes with the magnetic bracelets and
    the
    plastic hose clamp / magnet thingies they sell to prolong your life.

    My old physics teacher, whom I had during the gas crisis back in the 70's,
    said if you took all the products that claimed to save gas and put them on
    one car, you would have to stop every 10 miles to drain the gas tank.

    Original Message

    > It seems I have seen a similar unit in a harbor freight catalog. This
    unit
    > just clamps to the incoming fuel line or something. I don't have a
    catalog
    > handy but will report back if I can find it.

    > > Sounds dangerous! I just wanted to check if you are aware how
    > dangerous
    > > vaporized gas is? I know you're probably aware of this, but I don't
    > want to
    > > read about you on the darwin awards website...
    > > I don't think vaporized gas is exactly hypergolic, but it's real
    > close!
    > > Please be careful...




    To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    Body of the message will be ignored.


    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Sign In or Register to comment.