--- In basicstamps@yahoogroups.com, "Adrian Schneider
<adrian.schneider@t...>" <adrian.schneider@t...> wrote:
> Will there be a new version of the Tokenizer library with the
> enhancements of PBasic 2.5?
Yes, I am on a FIRST team in Nashua, NH (Team 811) and like the other
800 FIRST robotics teams, we need the PBasic 2.5 Tokenizer.
I suppose the other route would be to convert the PBasic 2.5 syntax in
the default program (given us) to PBasic 2.0 syntax. I will try to
figure this out, but is there any sort of document that describes how
one might translate to the other?
(or at least a document that describes PBasic 2.5 syntax so that I can
understand precicely what the code is doing)
We're expecting PBASIC 2.5 to be available at the end of January/beginning of
February.
It will be posted on our web site as soon as it's available.
Thanks for your patience.
Will there be a new version of the Tokenizer library with the
enhancements of PBasic 2.5?
To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to: basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and Body
of the message will
be ignored.
I'm wondering whether the API for the new tokenizer will be different
than the existing one?
Regards,
_murat
On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 03:43 PM, jonwms@a... wrote:
> Yes, once we've fully tested everything.
>
> -- Jon Williams
> -- Parallax
>
> In a message dated 1/6/2003 2:49:07 AM Central Standard Time,
> adrian.schneider@t... writes:
>
>> Will there be a new version of the Tokenizer library with the
>> enhancements of PBasic 2.5?
>
>
>
> [noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
> basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject
> and Body of the message will be ignored.
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
No, I don't believe so. I sent a message into our Engineering group [noparse][[/noparse]I work
remotely] and haven't received any note contrary to my belief. If the API
changes, of course we will provide documentation when we release the new
tokenizer module.
-- Jon Williams
-- Parallax
In a message dated 1/9/2003 9:32:58 PM Central Standard Time, murat_stamp@e... writes:
> Hi Jon,
>
> I'm the author of MacBS2, a (the only?) Mac OS X IDE for the BS2.
> (http://www.interaction.rca.ac.uk/alumni/01-03/murat/MacBS2/)
>
> I'm wondering whether the API for the new tokenizer will be different
> than the existing one?
>
> Regards,
>
> _murat
[noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Comments
<adrian.schneider@t...>" <adrian.schneider@t...> wrote:
> Will there be a new version of the Tokenizer library with the
> enhancements of PBasic 2.5?
Yes, I am on a FIRST team in Nashua, NH (Team 811) and like the other
800 FIRST robotics teams, we need the PBasic 2.5 Tokenizer.
I suppose the other route would be to convert the PBasic 2.5 syntax in
the default program (given us) to PBasic 2.0 syntax. I will try to
figure this out, but is there any sort of document that describes how
one might translate to the other?
(or at least a document that describes PBasic 2.5 syntax so that I can
understand precicely what the code is doing)
Thanks,
-Quentin
We're expecting PBASIC 2.5 to be available at the end of January/beginning of
February.
It will be posted on our web site as soon as it's available.
Thanks for your patience.
Sincerely,
Erik Wood
Parallax, Inc.
599 Menlo Dr., Suite #100
Rocklin, CA 95765
(916) 624-8333
www.parallax.com
Original Message
From: Adrian Schneider <adrian.schneider@t...>
[noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=l2Elqoreu_t6gjB0xrVwOeRvL47Z63SygoecUM1W8ulF3LHO7giFhcCXyxP7Ydp9GkUVcIdRcLRR7PhZBX9O7Bewb5pnzEPo4w]adrian.schneider@t...[/url
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:48 AM
To: basicstamps@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] PBasic 2.5 and Tokenizer
Will there be a new version of the Tokenizer library with the
enhancements of PBasic 2.5?
To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and Body
of the message will
be ignored.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-- Jon Williams
-- Parallax
In a message dated 1/6/2003 2:49:07 AM Central Standard Time,
adrian.schneider@t... writes:
> Will there be a new version of the Tokenizer library with the
> enhancements of PBasic 2.5?
[noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I'm the author of MacBS2, a (the only?) Mac OS X IDE for the BS2.
(http://www.interaction.rca.ac.uk/alumni/01-03/murat/MacBS2/)
I'm wondering whether the API for the new tokenizer will be different
than the existing one?
Regards,
_murat
On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 03:43 PM, jonwms@a... wrote:
> Yes, once we've fully tested everything.
>
> -- Jon Williams
> -- Parallax
>
> In a message dated 1/6/2003 2:49:07 AM Central Standard Time,
> adrian.schneider@t... writes:
>
>> Will there be a new version of the Tokenizer library with the
>> enhancements of PBasic 2.5?
>
>
>
> [noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
> basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject
> and Body of the message will be ignored.
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
remotely] and haven't received any note contrary to my belief. If the API
changes, of course we will provide documentation when we release the new
tokenizer module.
-- Jon Williams
-- Parallax
In a message dated 1/9/2003 9:32:58 PM Central Standard Time,
murat_stamp@e... writes:
> Hi Jon,
>
> I'm the author of MacBS2, a (the only?) Mac OS X IDE for the BS2.
> (http://www.interaction.rca.ac.uk/alumni/01-03/murat/MacBS2/)
>
> I'm wondering whether the API for the new tokenizer will be different
> than the existing one?
>
> Regards,
>
> _murat
[noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]