does the new windows editor adjust for the stam p in use?
Archiver
Posts: 46,084
I'm just guessing but the pause is a fixed loop for 1 milli in the basic
code for that chip. The others require you to understand the clock speed
because as is often stated on this site the pbasic interpreter has only a
few bits left ( not enough space to add conditional statement.
Original Message
From: Mike Walsh [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=-dSjUZaEC1h4nCAcb3M1B0uwrh4oCM1TFaz7AjoTOIU0tayL_mLPbZgw3dKFJDxjzX4w2_Yb4SaU]walsh@c...[/url
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:22 AM
To: basicstamps@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] does the new windows editor adjust for the
stamp in use?
Jon,
Why is that? If pause command can compensate for processor speed, why have
other clock dependant commands not behave the same way? It seems strange
that you should have to look up baud rate parameters on a table for
different Stamp models.
Mike
At 08:45 AM 11/8/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>No. The PAUSE parameter is always specified in milliseconds, but other
>commands require adjustments to the parameters for each processor. Consult
>the help file or manual for specifics.
>
>-- Jon Williams
_________________________________
Mike Walsh
walsh@i...
[noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
Body of the message will be ignored.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
code for that chip. The others require you to understand the clock speed
because as is often stated on this site the pbasic interpreter has only a
few bits left ( not enough space to add conditional statement.
Original Message
From: Mike Walsh [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=-dSjUZaEC1h4nCAcb3M1B0uwrh4oCM1TFaz7AjoTOIU0tayL_mLPbZgw3dKFJDxjzX4w2_Yb4SaU]walsh@c...[/url
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:22 AM
To: basicstamps@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] does the new windows editor adjust for the
stamp in use?
Jon,
Why is that? If pause command can compensate for processor speed, why have
other clock dependant commands not behave the same way? It seems strange
that you should have to look up baud rate parameters on a table for
different Stamp models.
Mike
At 08:45 AM 11/8/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>No. The PAUSE parameter is always specified in milliseconds, but other
>commands require adjustments to the parameters for each processor. Consult
>the help file or manual for specifics.
>
>-- Jon Williams
_________________________________
Mike Walsh
walsh@i...
[noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
Body of the message will be ignored.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Comments
with the interpreter in the BASIC Stamp. IF-THEN-ELSE (and other niceties)
in the editor will be available soon.
-- Jon Williams
-- Parallax
In a message dated 11/8/02 9:31:03 AM Central Standard Time,
porter.sadler@s... writes:
> I'm just guessing but the pause is a fixed loop for 1 milli in the basic
> code for that chip. The others require you to understand the clock speed
> because as is often stated on this site the pbasic interpreter has only a
> few bits left ( not enough space to add conditional statement.
>
[noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]