Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
SV: [basicstamps] PIC vs. Basic Stamp — Parallax Forums

SV: [basicstamps] PIC vs. Basic Stamp

ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
edited 2002-11-04 14:35 in General Discussion
Greetings!

There's only two REAL advantages to using a BS2 over a 'raw PIC'...

1. Ease of programming.
a. Simple syntax
b. Simple to debug.

2. Very easy to get help...
a. This list.
b. People from Parallax ON this list...
c. Tons of examples available online...

The fact that it already has a voltage regulator and those fiddly bits
around the oscilator doesn't hurt either. (They can be 'quite fiddly' if
you're making your own PCB)

:-)
Trygve


Opprinnelig melding
Fra: rds2112geo [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=5SPnm1V7iEBSurYTM4QF6LZG6zyzlFaIJEeNA40BJNy9ymsIQx-a1NwgCnESdtmdR2rr2kv1qdbNoBlTKw]rds2112geo@y...[/url
Sendt: 4. november 2002 15:30
Til: basicstamps@yahoogroups.com
Emne: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] PIC vs. Basic Stamp


What's the advantages of using a BS2 over a "raw" PIC? Ok, I know,
some of the advantages are obvious, but I'd like to see your list.

To take the programming variable out of the equation, let's assume you
were programming the "raw" PIC in PicBasic.

Specificaly, what could a decent programmer do with a BS2 that he/she
couldn't do with a PIC/UART combo?

Thanks


To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
Body of the message will be ignored.


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Sign In or Register to comment.