Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
RISC Computers — Parallax Forums

RISC Computers

ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
edited 2002-08-31 17:37 in General Discussion
Can anyone anwser the following questions: What does PIC stand for. Are all
PIC controllers RISC systems?


[noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Comments

  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-08-31 07:46
    > Can anyone anwser the following questions: What does PIC stand for.
    ************
    "peripheral interface controller", I believe.




    >Are all PIC controllers RISC systems?
    ************
    Don't know.

    Ray McArthur
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-08-31 14:25
    Hello,
    PIC means "Programable Integrated Circuit", and all PICs, and most
    microcontrollers (8051,Scenix,Motorola) are based on the RISC architecture,
    because it uses a Reduce Instrucction Set.

    Ezequiel
    Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Original Message
    From: <dstyles669@a...>
    To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 2:41 AM
    Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] RISC Computers


    > Can anyone anwser the following questions: What does PIC stand for. Are
    all
    > PIC controllers RISC systems?
    >
    >
    > [noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    >
    >
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
    >
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-08-31 17:18
    So to understand this PIC concept better...If I needed to program in assemly
    or machine code PICs are not what I am looking for?


    [noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-08-31 17:37
    Contrar!=)
    PICs are exactly what you want to use if you want to use Assembly and
    Machine code. That is one of the reasons I'm looking at the stamp I
    know Basic I don't know Assembly.

    --- In basicstamps@y..., dstyles669@a... wrote:
    > So to understand this PIC concept better...If I needed to program in
    assemly
    > or machine code PICs are not what I am looking for?
    >
    >
    > [noparse][[/noparse]Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Sign In or Register to comment.