Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
stamp to stamp serial burnout? — Parallax Forums

stamp to stamp serial burnout?

ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
edited 2002-05-10 23:32 in General Discussion
Hello,

I've been trying sending serial data from one stamp to another. I have the
transmitting stamp connecting vss to the recieving stamp vss, and vdd to
the receiving stamp vss. I was trying this earlier in the week and it was
working fine, but tonight after I was doing it for a little while, my
transmitting stamp stopped working. When I tried to download code into it
it said hardware not found. Also, I noticed that the pic itself was hot,
never a good sign. So it seems clear that I burnt out the stamp, but I
wonder what I did wrong. I had the transmitting stamp in a carrier board on
a plastic table, could it have been static electricity? Is it incorrect to
directly connect two stamps like that?

opinions?

Comments

  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-05-10 06:36
    At 10:24 PM 5/9/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    >Hello,
    >
    >I've been trying sending serial data from one stamp to another. I have the
    >transmitting stamp connecting vss to the recieving stamp vss, and vdd to
    >the receiving stamp vss.

    sorry, I meant stamp 1 vss > stamp 2 vss, and stamp 1 vdd to stamp 2 vdd
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-05-10 14:45
    The stamp 1 vdd to stamp 2 vdd probably had something to do with it.
    Thats +5 vdc to +5vdc and if one of the vdd pins dropped voltage even
    momentarily, you hit the voltage regulator with reverse 5 volts.
    For serial comms, all you need is the two vss pins connected and one of
    the numbered I/O pins on each stamp connected.

    Don
    Original Message
    From: "raoul vaneigem" <raoul@c...>
    To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:36 PM
    Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] stamp to stamp serial burnout?


    > At 10:24 PM 5/9/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    > >Hello,
    > >
    > >I've been trying sending serial data from one stamp to another. I have
    the
    > >transmitting stamp connecting vss to the recieving stamp vss, and vdd to
    > >the receiving stamp vss.
    >
    > sorry, I meant stamp 1 vss > stamp 2 vss, and stamp 1 vdd to stamp 2 vdd
    >
    >
    >
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
    >
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-05-10 14:59
    -snip- and vdd to the receiving stamp vss. -
    This is either a condition known as a direct short to ground, or what we
    call a tapographical error. But seriously Vdd to Vdd should be ok as long as
    the total loading is not excessive, if it is, try connecting their Vin pins
    together or use an external 5 volt regulator to the Vdd pins. If the sending
    stamp is dead it might be just an internal regulator burn-out in which case
    an external regulator should solve the problem, try 78L05 or if you need
    more current a 78M05 is rated 500ma, still not enough use a 7805.

    KF4HAZ - Lonnie

    From: "raoul vaneigem" <raoul@
    > Hello,
    >
    > I've been trying sending serial data from one stamp to another. I have the
    > transmitting stamp connecting vss to the recieving stamp vss, and vdd to
    > the receiving stamp vss. I was trying this earlier in the week and it was
    > working fine, but tonight after I was doing it for a little while, my
    > transmitting stamp stopped working. When I tried to download code into it
    > it said hardware not found. Also, I noticed that the pic itself was hot,
    > never a good sign. So it seems clear that I burnt out the stamp, but I
    > wonder what I did wrong. I had the transmitting stamp in a carrier board
    on
    > a plastic table, could it have been static electricity? Is it incorrect to
    > directly connect two stamps like that?
    >
    > opinions?
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-05-10 15:52
    They do seem to be very voltage sensitive which is highlighted when you
    make an error in building the power supply. I have a device I made up
    the uses a 12vdc supply into a 7508 regulator that supplied 8 volts to
    the stamp for what I thought would be a regulated Vin. I use the 12vdc
    side of the regulator to power some small lamps thru a relay activated
    by a transistor switch off a BS2 pin. I found the BS2 program worked
    fine until an event occurred that triggered the relay, then the stamp
    went into a reset loop as long as that event was active. Found out that,
    with my poor eyesight and lack of attention, I had stuck a 10mf cap on
    the 12vdc input rather than a 1000mf cap as designed. The load of the
    lamps was enough to throw the voltage regulation way out which was
    affecting the 8vdc Vin. When I replaced that cap with the 1000mf as
    designed, it worked fine.

    Ray

    Don wrote:
    >
    > The stamp 1 vdd to stamp 2 vdd probably had something to do with it.
    > Thats +5 vdc to +5vdc and if one of the vdd pins dropped voltage even
    > momentarily, you hit the voltage regulator with reverse 5 volts.
    > For serial comms, all you need is the two vss pins connected and one of
    > the numbered I/O pins on each stamp connected.
    >
    > Don
    >
    Original Message
    > From: "raoul vaneigem" <raoul@c...>
    > To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:36 PM
    > Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] stamp to stamp serial burnout?
    >
    > > At 10:24 PM 5/9/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    > > >Hello,
    > > >
    > > >I've been trying sending serial data from one stamp to another. I have
    > the
    > > >transmitting stamp connecting vss to the recieving stamp vss, and vdd to
    > > >the receiving stamp vss.
    > >
    > > sorry, I meant stamp 1 vss > stamp 2 vss, and stamp 1 vdd to stamp 2 vdd
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    > Body of the message will be ignored.
    > >
    > >
    > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and Body
    of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-05-10 17:10
    At 06:45 AM 5/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    > The stamp 1 vdd to stamp 2 vdd probably had something to do with it.
    >Thats +5 vdc to +5vdc and if one of the vdd pins dropped voltage even
    >momentarily, you hit the voltage regulator with reverse 5 volts.
    > For serial comms, all you need is the two vss pins connected and one of
    >the numbered I/O pins on each stamp connected.

    I don't understand this, as I read in the Microcontroller Application
    Cookbook that vdd can supply a regulated +5v, 50ma max for additional
    circuitry. As the stamp only draws 10 ma, and I had no pins doing anything
    other than sending serial information, why would it be a problem to use vdd?
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-05-10 17:11
    At 08:59 AM 5/10/2002 -0500, you wrote:
    >-snip- and vdd to the receiving stamp vss. -
    >This is either a condition known as a direct short to ground, or what we
    >call a tapographical error. But seriously Vdd to Vdd should be ok as long as
    >the total loading is not excessive, if it is, try connecting their Vin pins
    >together or use an external 5 volt regulator to the Vdd pins. If the sending
    >stamp is dead it might be just an internal regulator burn-out in which case
    >an external regulator should solve the problem, try 78L05 or if you need
    >more current a 78M05 is rated 500ma, still not enough use a 7805.

    Thanks for the advice, where to I connect the output of the 7805 to make
    the stamp work again? To Vdd?
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-05-10 17:49
    At 10:25 AM 5/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    > By the way, are you using BS2 stamps and the Windows based editor? That
    >could be significant.

    One stamp powering the other. One stamp on a BOE, powered by the wall
    supply, one (the one that burned out) on a carrier board. BS2 with the DOS
    version of the editor. I just tested it on my other computer with the
    Windows Editor, and it gives me the same error, "stamp found but no power,
    etc".

    How significant is the risk of static damage?

    Also, I was working in a lab with some other people, and right around the
    same time my friends stamp stopped working, but his started working again,
    could some transient power surge have damaged the stamp that was drawing
    power from the plugged in stamp? It was plugged into a power strip so I
    didn't think that could have been the problem, but it does seem like a
    weird co-incidence.

    Thanks!

    >Don
    >
    Original Message
    >From: "raoul vaneigem" <raoul@c...>
    >To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    >Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:10 AM
    >Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] stamp to stamp serial burnout?
    >
    >
    > > At 06:45 AM 5/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    > > > The stamp 1 vdd to stamp 2 vdd probably had something to do with it.
    > > >Thats +5 vdc to +5vdc and if one of the vdd pins dropped voltage even
    > > >momentarily, you hit the voltage regulator with reverse 5 volts.
    > > > For serial comms, all you need is the two vss pins connected and one
    >of
    > > >the numbered I/O pins on each stamp connected.
    > >
    > > I don't understand this, as I read in the Microcontroller Application
    > > Cookbook that vdd can supply a regulated +5v, 50ma max for additional
    > > circuitry. As the stamp only draws 10 ma, and I had no pins doing anything
    > > other than sending serial information, why would it be a problem to use
    >vdd?
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    >Body of the message will be ignored.
    > >
    > >
    > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    >To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    >from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    >Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-05-10 18:23
    Are you trying to use one stamp to supply power to the other?
    If so, connecting VDD to VDD should be fine, assuming there is no other
    power connected to the second stamp. I assumed you had standard power
    supply (wall transformer or 9V battery) connected to each stamp.
    If you are powering one stamp with the other, and not taking any other
    current from the second stamp with other circuits, then it should have
    worked. If you have met these conditions, then I am not sure why your stamp
    burned out.
    Don
    Original Message
    From: "raoul vaneigem" <raoul@c...>
    To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:10 AM
    Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] stamp to stamp serial burnout?


    > At 06:45 AM 5/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    > > The stamp 1 vdd to stamp 2 vdd probably had something to do with it.
    > >Thats +5 vdc to +5vdc and if one of the vdd pins dropped voltage even
    > >momentarily, you hit the voltage regulator with reverse 5 volts.
    > > For serial comms, all you need is the two vss pins connected and one
    of
    > >the numbered I/O pins on each stamp connected.
    >
    > I don't understand this, as I read in the Microcontroller Application
    > Cookbook that vdd can supply a regulated +5v, 50ma max for additional
    > circuitry. As the stamp only draws 10 ma, and I had no pins doing anything
    > other than sending serial information, why would it be a problem to use
    vdd?
    >
    >
    >
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
    >
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-05-10 18:25
    By the way, are you using BS2 stamps and the Windows based editor? That
    could be significant.
    Don
    Original Message
    From: "raoul vaneigem" <raoul@c...>
    To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:10 AM
    Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] stamp to stamp serial burnout?


    > At 06:45 AM 5/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    > > The stamp 1 vdd to stamp 2 vdd probably had something to do with it.
    > >Thats +5 vdc to +5vdc and if one of the vdd pins dropped voltage even
    > >momentarily, you hit the voltage regulator with reverse 5 volts.
    > > For serial comms, all you need is the two vss pins connected and one
    of
    > >the numbered I/O pins on each stamp connected.
    >
    > I don't understand this, as I read in the Microcontroller Application
    > Cookbook that vdd can supply a regulated +5v, 50ma max for additional
    > circuitry. As the stamp only draws 10 ma, and I had no pins doing anything
    > other than sending serial information, why would it be a problem to use
    vdd?
    >
    >
    >
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
    >
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-05-10 18:54
    Well, I can't say 100% that the stamp is burned out, but I'd give it
    good odds. I know that with the DOS editors, (I have to use it for my slave
    BS1s), it is not unusual to have to unplug the programming cable from the
    stamp board and plug it back in one or more times to get it to work. I
    don't know exactly why.
    I highly doubt it was a transient surge that burned out the
    power-receiving stamp. Even if the powerstrip didn't stop a surge, the DC
    transformer does not respond linearly to current on the AC side, so it
    shouldn't have sent much more than its' rated voltage. Even then, it should
    have burned out the stamp connected to the wall first or as well.
    Don
    Original Message
    From: "raoul vaneigem" <raoul@c...>
    To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:49 AM
    Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] stamp to stamp serial burnout?


    > At 10:25 AM 5/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    > > By the way, are you using BS2 stamps and the Windows based editor?
    That
    > >could be significant.
    >
    > One stamp powering the other. One stamp on a BOE, powered by the wall
    > supply, one (the one that burned out) on a carrier board. BS2 with the DOS
    > version of the editor. I just tested it on my other computer with the
    > Windows Editor, and it gives me the same error, "stamp found but no power,
    > etc".
    >
    > How significant is the risk of static damage?
    >
    > Also, I was working in a lab with some other people, and right around the
    > same time my friends stamp stopped working, but his started working again,
    > could some transient power surge have damaged the stamp that was drawing
    > power from the plugged in stamp? It was plugged into a power strip so I
    > didn't think that could have been the problem, but it does seem like a
    > weird co-incidence.
    >
    > Thanks!
    >
    > >Don
    > >
    Original Message
    > >From: "raoul vaneigem" <raoul@c...>
    > >To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    > >Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:10 AM
    > >Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] stamp to stamp serial burnout?
    > >
    > >
    > > > At 06:45 AM 5/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    > > > > The stamp 1 vdd to stamp 2 vdd probably had something to do with
    it.
    > > > >Thats +5 vdc to +5vdc and if one of the vdd pins dropped voltage even
    > > > >momentarily, you hit the voltage regulator with reverse 5 volts.
    > > > > For serial comms, all you need is the two vss pins connected and
    one
    > >of
    > > > >the numbered I/O pins on each stamp connected.
    > > >
    > > > I don't understand this, as I read in the Microcontroller Application
    > > > Cookbook that vdd can supply a regulated +5v, 50ma max for additional
    > > > circuitry. As the stamp only draws 10 ma, and I had no pins doing
    anything
    > > > other than sending serial information, why would it be a problem to
    use
    > >vdd?
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > > > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > > > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject
    and
    > >Body of the message will be ignored.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > >from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    > >Body of the message will be ignored.
    > >
    > >
    > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
    >
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-05-10 18:57
    Oh, and as for static damage, it is about the same as any other circuit
    on a PC type board. It depends on the strength of the static charge ans
    where it went in. I understand the I/O pins can be particularly
    susceptable, depending on if they are set for input or output.

    Don
    Original Message
    From: "raoul vaneigem" <raoul@c...>
    To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:49 AM
    Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] stamp to stamp serial burnout?


    > At 10:25 AM 5/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    > > By the way, are you using BS2 stamps and the Windows based editor?
    That
    > >could be significant.
    >
    > One stamp powering the other. One stamp on a BOE, powered by the wall
    > supply, one (the one that burned out) on a carrier board. BS2 with the DOS
    > version of the editor. I just tested it on my other computer with the
    > Windows Editor, and it gives me the same error, "stamp found but no power,
    > etc".
    >
    > How significant is the risk of static damage?
    >
    > Also, I was working in a lab with some other people, and right around the
    > same time my friends stamp stopped working, but his started working again,
    > could some transient power surge have damaged the stamp that was drawing
    > power from the plugged in stamp? It was plugged into a power strip so I
    > didn't think that could have been the problem, but it does seem like a
    > weird co-incidence.
    >
    > Thanks!
    >
    > >Don
    > >
    Original Message
    > >From: "raoul vaneigem" <raoul@c...>
    > >To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    > >Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:10 AM
    > >Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] stamp to stamp serial burnout?
    > >
    > >
    > > > At 06:45 AM 5/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    > > > > The stamp 1 vdd to stamp 2 vdd probably had something to do with
    it.
    > > > >Thats +5 vdc to +5vdc and if one of the vdd pins dropped voltage even
    > > > >momentarily, you hit the voltage regulator with reverse 5 volts.
    > > > > For serial comms, all you need is the two vss pins connected and
    one
    > >of
    > > > >the numbered I/O pins on each stamp connected.
    > > >
    > > > I don't understand this, as I read in the Microcontroller Application
    > > > Cookbook that vdd can supply a regulated +5v, 50ma max for additional
    > > > circuitry. As the stamp only draws 10 ma, and I had no pins doing
    anything
    > > > other than sending serial information, why would it be a problem to
    use
    > >vdd?
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > > > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > > > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject
    and
    > >Body of the message will be ignored.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > >from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    > >Body of the message will be ignored.
    > >
    > >
    > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
    >
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-05-10 19:22
    I wired 2 stamps on my bad boy hexapod robot right to a bank of batteries
    8.4 vdc it worked real good. If any one wants to check out some pics or mpeg
    movie of my bot I will send. my e-mail is skip.webb@h... See
    Ya Skip

    Original Message
    From: Don [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=j_VLgdjPrMuvTTh0YL0SwP7ETjrfjbQQf5WHn7y-YHU1tNBk0COHY4QR5mbW-A9dxcFqodeQD8cg1gofEpxEObZL9UTIJg]renegade.engineer@v...[/url
    Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:58 PM
    To: basicstamps@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] stamp to stamp serial burnout?


    Oh, and as for static damage, it is about the same as any other circuit
    on a PC type board. It depends on the strength of the static charge ans
    where it went in. I understand the I/O pins can be particularly
    susceptable, depending on if they are set for input or output.

    Don
    Original Message
    From: "raoul vaneigem" <raoul@c...>
    To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:49 AM
    Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] stamp to stamp serial burnout?


    > At 10:25 AM 5/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    > > By the way, are you using BS2 stamps and the Windows based editor?
    That
    > >could be significant.
    >
    > One stamp powering the other. One stamp on a BOE, powered by the wall
    > supply, one (the one that burned out) on a carrier board. BS2 with the DOS
    > version of the editor. I just tested it on my other computer with the
    > Windows Editor, and it gives me the same error, "stamp found but no power,
    > etc".
    >
    > How significant is the risk of static damage?
    >
    > Also, I was working in a lab with some other people, and right around the
    > same time my friends stamp stopped working, but his started working again,
    > could some transient power surge have damaged the stamp that was drawing
    > power from the plugged in stamp? It was plugged into a power strip so I
    > didn't think that could have been the problem, but it does seem like a
    > weird co-incidence.
    >
    > Thanks!
    >
    > >Don
    > >
    Original Message
    > >From: "raoul vaneigem" <raoul@c...>
    > >To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    > >Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:10 AM
    > >Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] stamp to stamp serial burnout?
    > >
    > >
    > > > At 06:45 AM 5/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
    > > > > The stamp 1 vdd to stamp 2 vdd probably had something to do with
    it.
    > > > >Thats +5 vdc to +5vdc and if one of the vdd pins dropped voltage even
    > > > >momentarily, you hit the voltage regulator with reverse 5 volts.
    > > > > For serial comms, all you need is the two vss pins connected and
    one
    > >of
    > > > >the numbered I/O pins on each stamp connected.
    > > >
    > > > I don't understand this, as I read in the Microcontroller Application
    > > > Cookbook that vdd can supply a regulated +5v, 50ma max for additional
    > > > circuitry. As the stamp only draws 10 ma, and I had no pins doing
    anything
    > > > other than sending serial information, why would it be a problem to
    use
    > >vdd?
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > > > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > > > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject
    and
    > >Body of the message will be ignored.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > >from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    > >Body of the message will be ignored.
    > >
    > >
    > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
    >



    To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    from the same email address that you subscribed. Text in the Subject and
    Body of the message will be ignored.


    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2002-05-10 23:32

    From: "raoul vaneigem" <raoul@
    > At 08:59 AM 5/10/2002 -0500, you wrote:
    > >-snip- and vdd to the receiving stamp vss. -
    > >This is either a condition known as a direct short to ground, or what we
    > >call a tapographical error. But seriously Vdd to Vdd should be ok as long
    as
    > >the total loading is not excessive, if it is, try connecting their Vin
    pins
    > >together or use an external 5 volt regulator to the Vdd pins. If the
    sending
    > >stamp is dead it might be just an internal regulator burn-out in which
    case
    > >an external regulator should solve the problem, try 78L05 or if you need
    > >more current a 78M05 is rated 500ma, still not enough use a 7805.
    >
    > Thanks for the advice, where to I connect the output of the 7805 to make
    > the stamp work again? To Vdd?

    Yes and leave Vin open

    KF4HAZ - Lonnie
Sign In or Register to comment.