Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
AVR Sprint 2313 — Parallax Forums

AVR Sprint 2313

ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
edited 2001-11-10 11:24 in General Discussion
has anyone tried the Embedysy AVR Sprint 2313? (a competitor to the
BX24 and Stamp).

Comments

  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-11-09 15:44
    I have. I also have a fair number of of the ATtiny11/12/28's . I have them
    set up as networked sensor controllers using the pin and timer interupts
    for
    a single pin driving a software uart......
    The 2313/8515 are nice chips...very fast...very easy to program..well
    supported in assembly/c/basic.
    The interrupts available on them makes them fairly flexible.
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-11-10 01:20
    AVR is a very nice platform. They're fast, fairly inexpensive, and
    extremely flexible. At 8MHz, a stamp can outperform a 20MHz pic.
    The new 16MHz models should be able to outperform even a 50MHz
    Scenix.

    Their module looks interesting, though if you can spare the extra
    time/resources to implement a resonator and regulator onto
    the "target boards", or make a small board of your own, you can save
    a lot of money. I currently use the ATSTK500 development board for
    testing and development. It comes with 2 midrange AVR's (8515 and
    Mega163) which are both 40-pin units. These chips each cost about
    $6-10. Keep in mind you will still need a compiler. Their compiler
    appears to be a variant of BASCOM-AVR. I use BASCOM for most of my
    AVR programming because I have a good amount of experience with
    QBASIC, and the two languages are nearly 100% compatible.

    I currently build most of my systems with AVR, though I still use
    the Stamps. Though the AVR's may have 500x more performance,
    there's just nothing like plugging a chip in and having it work
    without any soldering. I still think it would be nice to see a
    stamp based on the ATMega8. At 16MHz, it's a very speedy chip, and
    even has on-chip ADC and resonator, so there's no need to have an
    external resonator. Best of all, the MLF version is only 5mm by
    5mm, so it could probably even fit on a BS1-size board!

    --- In basicstamps@y..., "Phillip W Mann" <pwmann@w...> wrote:
    >
    > I have. I also have a fair number of of the ATtiny11/12/28's . I
    have them
    > set up as networked sensor controllers using the pin and timer
    interupts
    > for
    > a single pin driving a software uart......
    > The 2313/8515 are nice chips...very fast...very easy to
    program..well
    > supported in assembly/c/basic.
    > The interrupts available on them makes them fairly flexible.
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-11-10 11:24
    Our AVR Starterkit could be of interest for European customers.
    Further info at www.ckuehnel.ch/ask.htm

    BASCOM: Programming Microcontrollers with Ease - ISBN 1-58112-671-9
    www.upublish.com/books/kuhnel.htm

    www.ckuehnel.ch *** www.ckskript.ch *** www ckskript.de

    --- In basicstamps@y..., pyromaneyakk@h... wrote:
    > AVR is a very nice platform. They're fast, fairly inexpensive, and
    > extremely flexible. At 8MHz, a stamp can outperform a 20MHz pic.
    > The new 16MHz models should be able to outperform even a 50MHz
    > Scenix.
    >
    > Their module looks interesting, though if you can spare the extra
    > time/resources to implement a resonator and regulator onto
    > the "target boards", or make a small board of your own, you can
    save
    > a lot of money. I currently use the ATSTK500 development board for
    > testing and development. It comes with 2 midrange AVR's (8515 and
    > Mega163) which are both 40-pin units. These chips each cost about
    > $6-10. Keep in mind you will still need a compiler. Their
    compiler
    > appears to be a variant of BASCOM-AVR. I use BASCOM for most of my
    > AVR programming because I have a good amount of experience with
    > QBASIC, and the two languages are nearly 100% compatible.
    >
    > I currently build most of my systems with AVR, though I still use
    > the Stamps. Though the AVR's may have 500x more performance,
    > there's just nothing like plugging a chip in and having it work
    > without any soldering. I still think it would be nice to see a
    > stamp based on the ATMega8. At 16MHz, it's a very speedy chip, and
    > even has on-chip ADC and resonator, so there's no need to have an
    > external resonator. Best of all, the MLF version is only 5mm by
    > 5mm, so it could probably even fit on a BS1-size board!
    >
    > --- In basicstamps@y..., "Phillip W Mann" <pwmann@w...> wrote:
    > >
    > > I have. I also have a fair number of of the ATtiny11/12/28's . I
    > have them
    > > set up as networked sensor controllers using the pin and timer
    > interupts
    > > for
    > > a single pin driving a software uart......
    > > The 2313/8515 are nice chips...very fast...very easy to
    > program..well
    > > supported in assembly/c/basic.
    > > The interrupts available on them makes them fairly flexible.
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-11-10 11:24
    Our AVR Starterkit could be of interest for European customers.
    Further info at www.ckuehnel.ch/ask.htm

    BASCOM: Programming Microcontrollers with Ease - ISBN 1-58112-671-9
    www.upublish.com/books/kuhnel.htm

    www.ckuehnel.ch *** www.ckskript.ch *** www ckskript.de

    --- In basicstamps@y..., pyromaneyakk@h... wrote:
    > AVR is a very nice platform. They're fast, fairly inexpensive, and
    > extremely flexible. At 8MHz, a stamp can outperform a 20MHz pic.
    > The new 16MHz models should be able to outperform even a 50MHz
    > Scenix.
    >
    > Their module looks interesting, though if you can spare the extra
    > time/resources to implement a resonator and regulator onto
    > the "target boards", or make a small board of your own, you can
    save
    > a lot of money. I currently use the ATSTK500 development board for
    > testing and development. It comes with 2 midrange AVR's (8515 and
    > Mega163) which are both 40-pin units. These chips each cost about
    > $6-10. Keep in mind you will still need a compiler. Their
    compiler
    > appears to be a variant of BASCOM-AVR. I use BASCOM for most of my
    > AVR programming because I have a good amount of experience with
    > QBASIC, and the two languages are nearly 100% compatible.
    >
    > I currently build most of my systems with AVR, though I still use
    > the Stamps. Though the AVR's may have 500x more performance,
    > there's just nothing like plugging a chip in and having it work
    > without any soldering. I still think it would be nice to see a
    > stamp based on the ATMega8. At 16MHz, it's a very speedy chip, and
    > even has on-chip ADC and resonator, so there's no need to have an
    > external resonator. Best of all, the MLF version is only 5mm by
    > 5mm, so it could probably even fit on a BS1-size board!
    >
    > --- In basicstamps@y..., "Phillip W Mann" <pwmann@w...> wrote:
    > >
    > > I have. I also have a fair number of of the ATtiny11/12/28's . I
    > have them
    > > set up as networked sensor controllers using the pin and timer
    > interupts
    > > for
    > > a single pin driving a software uart......
    > > The 2313/8515 are nice chips...very fast...very easy to
    > program..well
    > > supported in assembly/c/basic.
    > > The interrupts available on them makes them fairly flexible.
Sign In or Register to comment.