Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Vehicle speed limitation. — Parallax Forums

Vehicle speed limitation.

ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
edited 2001-06-13 10:22 in General Discussion
i want to limit the speed of a vehicle fitted with a six cylinder carbureted engine, using a bs2 reading a signal from a proximity sensor monitoring wheel speed.
does anyone know how to take a signal from the stamp and use it to interupt the engine's ignition spark when the vehicle reaches the desired speed?
regards,
keith moore.

Comments

  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-06-01 13:39
    not a real good idea to interrupt the spark, the cyls will still be drawing
    gas/air mix into them and then sending it to the exhaust system.

    the first spark or excess heat will ignite it explosively blowing the
    muffler to shreds.

    better use a servo or solenoid to pull the carb throttle plates a little
    more closed.

    or sound an alarm so loud and or bad sounding that the operator slows down
    to relieve him/her self of the noise.


    norm



    >From: "Keith Moore" <keithmoore1@n...>
    >Reply-To: basicstamps@yahoogroups.com
    >To: <BASICSTAMPS@YAHOOGROUPS.COM>
    >Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] VEHICLE SPEED LIMITATION.
    >Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:18:17 -0400
    >
    >I WANT TO LIMIT THE SPEED OF A VEHICLE FITTED WITH A SIX CYLINDER
    >CARBURETED ENGINE, USING A BS2 READING A SIGNAL FROM A PROXIMITY SENSOR
    >MONITORING WHEEL SPEED.
    >DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO TAKE A SIGNAL FROM THE STAMP AND USE IT TO INTERUPT
    >THE ENGINE'S IGNITION SPARK WHEN THE VEHICLE REACHES THE DESIRED SPEED?
    >REGARDS,
    >KEITH MOORE.

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-06-01 18:23
    Coming from one who works on the race car, the multi spark
    distributor, does just that. When the rev limiter is reached, it
    selectivly starts to remove cylinders from the firing order in order
    to cause the rpms to go down. It does not cut all of them off all at
    once. Crane makes a MSD called a Fireball which has a rev limiter in
    it, but you are actually looking for a speed limiter. You could
    start to ground out the distributor with pulses low, assuming
    electronic ignition. But I would stay away from the high voltage
    stuff with the stamp.

    -Rory.


    --- In basicstamps@y..., "norman doty" <normdoty@h...> wrote:
    > not a real good idea to interrupt the spark, the cyls will still be
    drawing
    > gas/air mix into them and then sending it to the exhaust system.
    >
    > the first spark or excess heat will ignite it explosively blowing
    the
    > muffler to shreds.
    >
    > better use a servo or solenoid to pull the carb throttle plates a
    little
    > more closed.
    >
    > or sound an alarm so loud and or bad sounding that the operator
    slows down
    > to relieve him/her self of the noise.
    >
    >
    > norm
    >
    >
    >
    > >From: "Keith Moore" <keithmoore1@n...>
    > >Reply-To: basicstamps@y...
    > >To: <BASICSTAMPS@Y...>
    > >Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] VEHICLE SPEED LIMITATION.
    > >Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:18:17 -0400
    > >
    > >I WANT TO LIMIT THE SPEED OF A VEHICLE FITTED WITH A SIX CYLINDER
    > >CARBURETED ENGINE, USING A BS2 READING A SIGNAL FROM A PROXIMITY
    SENSOR
    > >MONITORING WHEEL SPEED.
    > >DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO TAKE A SIGNAL FROM THE STAMP AND USE IT TO
    INTERUPT
    > >THE ENGINE'S IGNITION SPARK WHEN THE VEHICLE REACHES THE DESIRED
    SPEED?
    > >REGARDS,
    > >KEITH MOORE.
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-06-01 18:47
    >I WANT TO LIMIT THE SPEED OF A VEHICLE FITTED WITH A SIX CYLINDER
    >CARBURETED ENGINE, USING A BS2 READING A SIGNAL FROM A PROXIMITY SENSOR
    >MONITORING WHEEL SPEED.
    >DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO TAKE A SIGNAL FROM THE STAMP AND USE IT TO INTERUPT
    >THE ENGINE'S IGNITION SPARK WHEN THE VEHICLE REACHES THE DESIRED SPEED?

    Keith,

    For the speed sensing, just use a magnetic pickup. Your trigger wheel should
    be iron, with one or more holes or teeth. The flywheel ring gear is very
    convenient for this purpose. Output of the mag pickup is a pulse train,
    which you can condition with an op-amp, and then have read by the stamp.
    With some math, you can compute the engine RPM from the pulse train
    frequency.

    To limit the power, it is very common to simply retard the spark timing.
    Note that this has very little effect if the engine is not loaded. To retard
    the timing, most distributors have some form of vaccuum advance, e.g.,
    timing advances as vaccuum in the intake manifold drops. You will need a
    soleniod that you can switch by the stamp. The solenoid should go between
    the distributor vaccuum advance mechanism and a source of vaccuum.

    Finally, typing in all caps equates to shouting.

    Regards,

    Rob
    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-06-01 21:26
    [font=arial,helvetica]Someone suggested retarding the timing to limit speed. ·This is not a very
    good idea since it will cause the engine to over heat if the timing is
    retarded for very long. ·20-30 seconds is probably too long. ·Use caution
    with this method.[/font]
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-06-01 21:51
    >Someone suggested retarding the timing to limit speed. This is not a very
    >good idea since it will cause the engine to over heat if the timing is
    >retarded for very long. 20-30 seconds is probably too long. Use caution
    >with this method.

    True! However, using the method I suggested, the timing cannot be retarded
    more than the stock setting, unless the distributor were physically rotated.

    The original author of the question did not state a time limit, so I
    inferred momentary speed limiting.

    Regards,

    Rob
    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-06-02 01:08
    Limiting the speed in relation to the flywheel will only limit the RPM of
    the engine, you need to sense the speed of the tailshaft to have a speed
    limit.

    You can do it with 2 pulleys if you can rotate a plate with the 2 pulleys
    mounted to it, fairly easy as can could mount it directly to the top of a
    strong stepper motor. In normal operation the cable changes direction around
    the pulleys, in overspeed the pulley plate turns and the cable straightens
    out, thereby lengthening (if thats a word) the cable. When the speed comes
    back into range the pulleys then turn back to shorten the throttle cable.
    This way you don't have to have any interface to the distributor or HV
    leads, and just put a sensor at a wheel or the tailshaft.
    The downside is that you may have change your existing cable.
    I'd be interested to know how it goes,
    Regards, Chris.

    fes@g...

    Original Message
    From: Rob Weinstock <weinstro@h...>
    To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 5:47 PM
    Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] VEHICLE SPEED LIMITATION.


    > >I WANT TO LIMIT THE SPEED OF A VEHICLE FITTED WITH A SIX CYLINDER
    > >CARBURETED ENGINE, USING A BS2 READING A SIGNAL FROM A PROXIMITY SENSOR
    > >MONITORING WHEEL SPEED.
    > >DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO TAKE A SIGNAL FROM THE STAMP AND USE IT TO
    INTERUPT
    > >THE ENGINE'S IGNITION SPARK WHEN THE VEHICLE REACHES THE DESIRED SPEED?
    >
    > Keith,
    >
    > For the speed sensing, just use a magnetic pickup. Your trigger wheel
    should
    > be iron, with one or more holes or teeth. The flywheel ring gear is very
    > convenient for this purpose. Output of the mag pickup is a pulse train,
    > which you can condition with an op-amp, and then have read by the stamp.
    > With some math, you can compute the engine RPM from the pulse train
    > frequency.
    >
    > To limit the power, it is very common to simply retard the spark timing.
    > Note that this has very little effect if the engine is not loaded. To
    retard
    > the timing, most distributors have some form of vaccuum advance, e.g.,
    > timing advances as vaccuum in the intake manifold drops. You will need a
    > soleniod that you can switch by the stamp. The solenoid should go between
    > the distributor vaccuum advance mechanism and a source of vaccuum.
    >
    > Finally, typing in all caps equates to shouting.
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Rob
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
    >
    >
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > from the same email address that you subscribed with. Text in the Subject
    and Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-06-12 20:38
    --- In basicstamps@y..., "Keith Moore" <keithmoore1@n...> wrote:
    > I WANT TO LIMIT THE SPEED OF A VEHICLE FITTED WITH A SIX CYLINDER
    CARBURETED ENGINE, USING A BS2 READING A SIGNAL FROM A PROXIMITY
    SENSOR MONITORING WHEEL SPEED.
    > DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO TAKE A SIGNAL FROM THE STAMP AND USE IT TO
    INTERUPT THE ENGINE'S IGNITION SPARK WHEN THE VEHICLE REACHES THE
    DESIRED SPEED?
    > REGARDS,
    > KEITH MOORE.

    Hi Keith,

    What I believe you want to implement is an electronic governor. This
    is dangerous and needs many safeties built into the system. It would
    have the additional benefit of speed control that you could possibly
    alter on the fly.

    Inputs would be vehicle speed (if a late model you may be able to tap
    the speed sensor that exists), Your lead foot desires (Accelerator
    pedal hooked to a pot.

    Your output would be a servo driven throttle.

    You better plan on multiple fail safes. Don't let the engine run away
    while in park or reverse (noisy pot).

    Like speed control a tap on the brake pedal should kill many things.

    Remember you are about to take a 2000 lb mass that could kill a lot of
    things if the system malfunctions the wrong way (remember to
    waterproof the throttle servo)

    This system should allow full throtle operation (with a quick
    servo)and rapid acceleration right up to governed speed.

    Good luck, Plan 6 times then execute this beast. I hope I don't run
    into you,

    Don Denhardt
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-06-12 23:32
    Usually attempts to short out the ignition result in a loud
    explosion, burst muffler and a lot of rattled bystanders when the
    ignition is partially or fully switched back on (not good)

    Usually attempts to even partially stop or short out some of the
    cylinders may result in the catalytic converter overheating and
    possibly starting a car fire. GM had some problems in this area with
    properly running engines

    Usually attempts to modify the timing will foul the engine and
    emissions equipment.

    So take your pick, loud explosions (burst mufflers), car fires,
    ruined
    engines or emissions equipment or the possibility of killing folks if
    the system runs away while in gear or engine parts and lots o oil in
    the driveway if it does it in the driveway in park.

    The only safe alternative would be to bleed off the power with
    decompression valves located on a few or all cylinders (big job) or
    rigging the engine with a second throttle valve assy (servo
    controlled) that begins to close as desired speed is reached.
    hmmmmmmmmmm.

    I think it would be easier to fail safe an electronic governor. All
    that would require is LOTS O Planning.

    They do make mechanical governors, but the original question asked
    was
    how best to have a Stamp do it. The idea of tampering with ignition
    just wont fly.


    --- In basicstamps@y..., "Nick H" <lightclb@y...> wrote:
    > Umm, this may be stupid, but I think there is a better(safer) way of
    > implimenting this. Leave the throttle intact, still read from all
    > appropriate inputs, and control spark. When conditions are right,
    you could
    > switch off spark. Most late model cars are equipped with some sort
    of
    > electronic ignition that would not be too difficult to interface
    with.
    >
    > Just an idea, seems safer to me [noparse]:)[/noparse]
    > -Nick
    >
    Original Message
    > From: <dondenhardt@y...>
    > To: <basicstamps@y...>
    > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:38 PM
    > Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Re: VEHICLE SPEED LIMITATION.
    >
    >
    > > --- In basicstamps@y..., "Keith Moore" <keithmoore1@n...> wrote:
    > > > I WANT TO LIMIT THE SPEED OF A VEHICLE FITTED WITH A SIX
    CYLINDER
    > > CARBURETED ENGINE, USING A BS2 READING A SIGNAL FROM A PROXIMITY
    > > SENSOR MONITORING WHEEL SPEED.
    > > > DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO TAKE A SIGNAL FROM THE STAMP AND USE IT
    TO
    > > INTERUPT THE ENGINE'S IGNITION SPARK WHEN THE VEHICLE REACHES THE
    > > DESIRED SPEED?
    > > > REGARDS,
    > > > KEITH MOORE.
    > >
    > > Hi Keith,
    > >
    > > What I believe you want to implement is an electronic governor.
    This
    > > is dangerous and needs many safeties built into the system. It
    would
    > > have the additional benefit of speed control that you could
    possibly
    > > alter on the fly.
    > >
    > > Inputs would be vehicle speed (if a late model you may be able to
    tap
    > > the speed sensor that exists), Your lead foot desires (Accelerator
    > > pedal hooked to a pot.
    > >
    > > Your output would be a servo driven throttle.
    > >
    > > You better plan on multiple fail safes. Don't let the engine run
    away
    > > while in park or reverse (noisy pot).
    > >
    > > Like speed control a tap on the brake pedal should kill many
    things.
    > >
    > > Remember you are about to take a 2000 lb mass that could kill a
    lot of
    > > things if the system malfunctions the wrong way (remember to
    > > waterproof the throttle servo)
    > >
    > > This system should allow full throtle operation (with a quick
    > > servo)and rapid acceleration right up to governed speed.
    > >
    > > Good luck, Plan 6 times then execute this beast. I hope I don't
    run
    > > into you,
    > >
    > > Don Denhardt
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > > basicstamps-unsubscribe@y...
    > > from the same email address that you subscribed with. Text in
    the
    Subject
    > and Body of the message will be ignored.
    > >
    > >
    > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    > _________________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-06-12 23:54
    Late model cars do employ a basic electronic ignition. Unfortunatly
    it is controlled by the on board computer. I don't believe it would
    be as easy as you suggest to interface with it.

    In essence what you are suggesting is to redesign the computer
    controlled fuel and ignition system? The fella that originally wrote
    said he had a carb, but many folks have mistaken a single
    injector/throttle body for a carburetor.

    1. I don't know if the BS 2 runs fast enough for that

    2. None of the automotive companies will supply you with sufficient
    documentation for you to bypass or interface with their systems.


    --- In basicstamps@y..., "Nick H" <lightclb@y...> wrote:
    > Umm, this may be stupid, but I think there is a better(safer) way of
    > implimenting this. Leave the throttle intact, still read from all
    > appropriate inputs, and control spark. When conditions are right,
    you could
    > switch off spark. Most late model cars are equipped with some sort
    of
    > electronic ignition that would not be too difficult to interface
    with.
    >
    > Just an idea, seems safer to me [noparse]:)[/noparse]
    > -Nick
    >
    Original Message
    > From: <dondenhardt@y...>
    > To: <basicstamps@y...>
    > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:38 PM
    > Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Re: VEHICLE SPEED LIMITATION.
    >
    >
    > > --- In basicstamps@y..., "Keith Moore" <keithmoore1@n...> wrote:
    > > > I WANT TO LIMIT THE SPEED OF A VEHICLE FITTED WITH A SIX
    CYLINDER
    > > CARBURETED ENGINE, USING A BS2 READING A SIGNAL FROM A PROXIMITY
    > > SENSOR MONITORING WHEEL SPEED.
    > > > DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO TAKE A SIGNAL FROM THE STAMP AND USE IT
    TO
    > > INTERUPT THE ENGINE'S IGNITION SPARK WHEN THE VEHICLE REACHES THE
    > > DESIRED SPEED?
    > > > REGARDS,
    > > > KEITH MOORE.
    > >
    > > Hi Keith,
    > >
    > > What I believe you want to implement is an electronic governor.
    This
    > > is dangerous and needs many safeties built into the system. It
    would
    > > have the additional benefit of speed control that you could
    possibly
    > > alter on the fly.
    > >
    > > Inputs would be vehicle speed (if a late model you may be able to
    tap
    > > the speed sensor that exists), Your lead foot desires (Accelerator
    > > pedal hooked to a pot.
    > >
    > > Your output would be a servo driven throttle.
    > >
    > > You better plan on multiple fail safes. Don't let the engine run
    away
    > > while in park or reverse (noisy pot).
    > >
    > > Like speed control a tap on the brake pedal should kill many
    things.
    > >
    > > Remember you are about to take a 2000 lb mass that could kill a
    lot of
    > > things if the system malfunctions the wrong way (remember to
    > > waterproof the throttle servo)
    > >
    > > This system should allow full throtle operation (with a quick
    > > servo)and rapid acceleration right up to governed speed.
    > >
    > > Good luck, Plan 6 times then execute this beast. I hope I don't
    run
    > > into you,
    > >
    > > Don Denhardt
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > > basicstamps-unsubscribe@y...
    > > from the same email address that you subscribed with. Text in the
    Subject
    > and Body of the message will be ignored.
    > >
    > >
    > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    > _________________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-06-13 00:21
    Umm, this may be stupid, but I think there is a better(safer) way of
    implimenting this. Leave the throttle intact, still read from all
    appropriate inputs, and control spark. When conditions are right, you could
    switch off spark. Most late model cars are equipped with some sort of
    electronic ignition that would not be too difficult to interface with.

    Just an idea, seems safer to me [noparse]:)[/noparse]
    -Nick
    Original Message
    From: <dondenhardt@y...>
    To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:38 PM
    Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Re: VEHICLE SPEED LIMITATION.


    > --- In basicstamps@y..., "Keith Moore" <keithmoore1@n...> wrote:
    > > I WANT TO LIMIT THE SPEED OF A VEHICLE FITTED WITH A SIX CYLINDER
    > CARBURETED ENGINE, USING A BS2 READING A SIGNAL FROM A PROXIMITY
    > SENSOR MONITORING WHEEL SPEED.
    > > DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO TAKE A SIGNAL FROM THE STAMP AND USE IT TO
    > INTERUPT THE ENGINE'S IGNITION SPARK WHEN THE VEHICLE REACHES THE
    > DESIRED SPEED?
    > > REGARDS,
    > > KEITH MOORE.
    >
    > Hi Keith,
    >
    > What I believe you want to implement is an electronic governor. This
    > is dangerous and needs many safeties built into the system. It would
    > have the additional benefit of speed control that you could possibly
    > alter on the fly.
    >
    > Inputs would be vehicle speed (if a late model you may be able to tap
    > the speed sensor that exists), Your lead foot desires (Accelerator
    > pedal hooked to a pot.
    >
    > Your output would be a servo driven throttle.
    >
    > You better plan on multiple fail safes. Don't let the engine run away
    > while in park or reverse (noisy pot).
    >
    > Like speed control a tap on the brake pedal should kill many things.
    >
    > Remember you are about to take a 2000 lb mass that could kill a lot of
    > things if the system malfunctions the wrong way (remember to
    > waterproof the throttle servo)
    >
    > This system should allow full throtle operation (with a quick
    > servo)and rapid acceleration right up to governed speed.
    >
    > Good luck, Plan 6 times then execute this beast. I hope I don't run
    > into you,
    >
    > Don Denhardt
    >
    >
    >
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > from the same email address that you subscribed with. Text in the Subject
    and Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >


    _________________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-06-13 02:04
    In fact the more I think of it, the more elegant the secondary
    throttle plate idea would be to implement. You'd start with a tube
    whose I.D. is equal to or greater than the throat of the carb. Weld
    flanges to mate it to the carb and intake manifold. Make up a
    throttle plate and shaft with shaft bushings and a crank arm on the
    outside. Welding and machine shops do a lot of work more inexpensivly
    than you would think.

    You'd have to road test to see at what angle of closure you can
    restrict car speed to say 40 or 50. Install a limit at that point or
    teach the servo not to close any further (Radio control servo - PWM).
    The secondary throttle would be in the wide open position in all
    cases except within 2-5 MPH to governed speed. At which point it
    begins to close rapidly. Testing would establish the degree of
    motion needed to govern.

    You could even make it out of plastic plumbing parts. Some of the
    blends tolerate heat very well. But the best would be metal.

    Why?? You'd want to enclose your servo in an insulated box that
    sorrounded the secondary throttle body.

    The underhood temps can exceed your thermostat setting while standing
    or shut off after a hot run. The incoming air (ducted from outside
    air in most cars) would keep the servo chamber close to ambient air
    temps. Running some of the ducted air through the chamber would be
    better.



    --- In basicstamps@y..., dondenhardt@y... wrote:
    > Late model cars do employ a basic electronic ignition. Unfortunatly
    > it is controlled by the on board computer. I don't believe it would
    > be as easy as you suggest to interface with it.
    >
    > In essence what you are suggesting is to redesign the computer
    > controlled fuel and ignition system? The fella that originally
    wrote
    > said he had a carb, but many folks have mistaken a single
    > injector/throttle body for a carburetor.
    >
    > 1. I don't know if the BS 2 runs fast enough for that
    >
    > 2. None of the automotive companies will supply you with sufficient
    > documentation for you to bypass or interface with their systems.
    >
    >
    > --- In basicstamps@y..., "Nick H" <lightclb@y...> wrote:
    > > Umm, this may be stupid, but I think there is a better(safer) way
    of
    > > implimenting this. Leave the throttle intact, still read from all
    > > appropriate inputs, and control spark. When conditions are right,
    > you could
    > > switch off spark. Most late model cars are equipped with some sort
    > of
    > > electronic ignition that would not be too difficult to interface
    > with.
    > >
    > > Just an idea, seems safer to me [noparse]:)[/noparse]
    > > -Nick
    > >
    Original Message
    > > From: <dondenhardt@y...>
    > > To: <basicstamps@y...>
    > > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:38 PM
    > > Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Re: VEHICLE SPEED LIMITATION.
    > >
    > >
    > > > --- In basicstamps@y..., "Keith Moore" <keithmoore1@n...> wrote:
    > > > > I WANT TO LIMIT THE SPEED OF A VEHICLE FITTED WITH A SIX
    > CYLINDER
    > > > CARBURETED ENGINE, USING A BS2 READING A SIGNAL FROM A PROXIMITY
    > > > SENSOR MONITORING WHEEL SPEED.
    > > > > DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO TAKE A SIGNAL FROM THE STAMP AND USE
    IT
    > TO
    > > > INTERUPT THE ENGINE'S IGNITION SPARK WHEN THE VEHICLE REACHES
    THE
    > > > DESIRED SPEED?
    > > > > REGARDS,
    > > > > KEITH MOORE.
    > > >
    > > > Hi Keith,
    > > >
    > > > What I believe you want to implement is an electronic governor.
    > This
    > > > is dangerous and needs many safeties built into the system. It
    > would
    > > > have the additional benefit of speed control that you could
    > possibly
    > > > alter on the fly.
    > > >
    > > > Inputs would be vehicle speed (if a late model you may be able
    to
    > tap
    > > > the speed sensor that exists), Your lead foot desires
    (Accelerator
    > > > pedal hooked to a pot.
    > > >
    > > > Your output would be a servo driven throttle.
    > > >
    > > > You better plan on multiple fail safes. Don't let the engine
    run
    > away
    > > > while in park or reverse (noisy pot).
    > > >
    > > > Like speed control a tap on the brake pedal should kill many
    > things.
    > > >
    > > > Remember you are about to take a 2000 lb mass that could kill a
    > lot of
    > > > things if the system malfunctions the wrong way (remember to
    > > > waterproof the throttle servo)
    > > >
    > > > This system should allow full throtle operation (with a quick
    > > > servo)and rapid acceleration right up to governed speed.
    > > >
    > > > Good luck, Plan 6 times then execute this beast. I hope I
    don't
    > run
    > > > into you,
    > > >
    > > > Don Denhardt
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > > > basicstamps-unsubscribe@y...
    > > > from the same email address that you subscribed with. Text in
    the
    > Subject
    > > and Body of the message will be ignored.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > > _________________________________________________________
    > > Do You Yahoo!?
    > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-06-13 03:15
    I have been reading on this subject ever since it started and I have seen one thing, almost everyone ( not everyone ) is trying to say that there is no way to shut down the cylinders of a motor, well hate to tell you can. There·is allot of co. making rev limiters. MSD Ignition, Holley, Crane Cams, Accel, Mallory Ignition, Jacobs Electronics, and much more. MSD has the best rev limiter (·8728 ) MSD's write up about there rev controller··

    ··· ·"· The Soft Touch drops spark one cylinder at a time until your engine is at or below its maximum rpm. Those cylinders are then fired on the next cycle to prevent them from loading up with fuel. The result is a smooth rev limiting action without all the rough stuff.·· "

    Now I have been using this model rev limiter for about 2 years now, but I have been using the 6AL ignition ( 6420 ) for about 20 years. Witch works on analog, and they have never changed it ever since it was first made.

    Now I do not think the BS2 has the speed, but I think the BS2p should. MSD came out with a Digital Ignition control ( Digital-6 Plus··· 6520 ) that runs on 15MHz. and if that thing can handle a 20 degree spark duration through 3,300 rpm, a single stage retard, a start retard, and two adjustable rev limiters, the BS2p should handle it.

    For the one that asked the first question keep trying you will get it, Rome was not built in a day. Have Fun!!!

    MSD's website···· http://www.msdignition.com/
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-06-13 05:23
    Check to see if you have a mechanical or electrical connection on the back of
    the accelerator pedal. You will also need to interface with the speedometer.
    If you can reliably get both of those then you would have a much easier task.
  • ArchiverArchiver Posts: 46,084
    edited 2001-06-13 10:22
    The system will backfire thru the exhaust if the ignition is killed for a
    short time and the exhaust fills with unburnt fuel / air mixture !!
    Chris

    Original Message
    From: Nick H <lightclb@y...>
    To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 7:21 AM
    Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Re: VEHICLE SPEED LIMITATION.


    > Umm, this may be stupid, but I think there is a better(safer) way of
    > implimenting this. Leave the throttle intact, still read from all
    > appropriate inputs, and control spark. When conditions are right, you
    could
    > switch off spark. Most late model cars are equipped with some sort of
    > electronic ignition that would not be too difficult to interface with.
    >
    > Just an idea, seems safer to me [noparse]:)[/noparse]
    > -Nick
    >
    Original Message
    > From: <dondenhardt@y...>
    > To: <basicstamps@yahoogroups.com>
    > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:38 PM
    > Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Re: VEHICLE SPEED LIMITATION.
    >
    >
    > > --- In basicstamps@y..., "Keith Moore" <keithmoore1@n...> wrote:
    > > > I WANT TO LIMIT THE SPEED OF A VEHICLE FITTED WITH A SIX CYLINDER
    > > CARBURETED ENGINE, USING A BS2 READING A SIGNAL FROM A PROXIMITY
    > > SENSOR MONITORING WHEEL SPEED.
    > > > DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO TAKE A SIGNAL FROM THE STAMP AND USE IT TO
    > > INTERUPT THE ENGINE'S IGNITION SPARK WHEN THE VEHICLE REACHES THE
    > > DESIRED SPEED?
    > > > REGARDS,
    > > > KEITH MOORE.
    > >
    > > Hi Keith,
    > >
    > > What I believe you want to implement is an electronic governor. This
    > > is dangerous and needs many safeties built into the system. It would
    > > have the additional benefit of speed control that you could possibly
    > > alter on the fly.
    > >
    > > Inputs would be vehicle speed (if a late model you may be able to tap
    > > the speed sensor that exists), Your lead foot desires (Accelerator
    > > pedal hooked to a pot.
    > >
    > > Your output would be a servo driven throttle.
    > >
    > > You better plan on multiple fail safes. Don't let the engine run away
    > > while in park or reverse (noisy pot).
    > >
    > > Like speed control a tap on the brake pedal should kill many things.
    > >
    > > Remember you are about to take a 2000 lb mass that could kill a lot of
    > > things if the system malfunctions the wrong way (remember to
    > > waterproof the throttle servo)
    > >
    > > This system should allow full throtle operation (with a quick
    > > servo)and rapid acceleration right up to governed speed.
    > >
    > > Good luck, Plan 6 times then execute this beast. I hope I don't run
    > > into you,
    > >
    > > Don Denhardt
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > > from the same email address that you subscribed with. Text in the
    Subject
    > and Body of the message will be ignored.
    > >
    > >
    > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    > _________________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
    >
    >
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, just send mail to:
    > basicstamps-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    > from the same email address that you subscribed with. Text in the Subject
    and Body of the message will be ignored.
    >
    >
    > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
    >
    >
Sign In or Register to comment.