BasicStamp vs PIC (was the ignition module thread)
Archiver
Posts: 46,084
--- In basicstamps@y..., DAZLOGAN@a... wrote:
> Use the PicBASIC Pro compiler from Melabs (www.melabs.com).
>
> Compile your basic programs and program the PICs directly.
>
> Compiled / programmed pics run hundreds of times faster than stamps.
>
> Regards,
> Darren
===========
A very informative site...thanks Darren. I'm new to all this, as I'm
mostly looking for a specific problem solution, rather than being an
electronics buff...do I gather that the PIC is a (the?) major
competitor to the BasicStamp?
Tom
> Use the PicBASIC Pro compiler from Melabs (www.melabs.com).
>
> Compile your basic programs and program the PICs directly.
>
> Compiled / programmed pics run hundreds of times faster than stamps.
>
> Regards,
> Darren
===========
A very informative site...thanks Darren. I'm new to all this, as I'm
mostly looking for a specific problem solution, rather than being an
electronics buff...do I gather that the PIC is a (the?) major
competitor to the BasicStamp?
Tom
Comments
rom?
-erik
Original Message
From: Tom Hastings [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=cRYBIc18-LDQ-kjiSHg-ijMizZJ4Z8-BPmbvVN4cc8VXZb67wlBTui99vsbnh__t83TuvYCIFTe2DJs]bummer46@h...[/url
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:07 AM
To: basicstamps@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] BasicStamp vs PIC (was the ignition module
thread)
--- In basicstamps@y..., DAZLOGAN@a... wrote:
> Use the PicBASIC Pro compiler from Melabs (www.melabs.com).
>
> Compile your basic programs and program the PICs directly.
>
> Compiled / programmed pics run hundreds of times faster than stamps.
>
> Regards,
> Darren
===========
A very informative site...thanks Darren. I'm new to all this, as I'm
mostly looking for a specific problem solution, rather than being an
electronics buff...do I gather that the PIC is a (the?) major
competitor to the BasicStamp?
Tom
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/