Read Receipts/Size of Stamp Group
Hi Al,
You may well be correct on the size of the stamp group, however even
if this were true
and we lowered the percentage to perhaps even 5% when you receive only
some 25-30
return receipts the overall group is still quite small. This was my
meaning.
In any case, I'm back to the drawing board (figuratively speaking).
Ron
Original Message
From: "Al Williams" <alw@a...>
To: <basicstamps@egroups.com>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 2:11 PM
Subject: RE: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Re:Read Receipts
> Just my 2 cents. My mail program asks me if I want to send a return
and I
> always say no in a case like this -- I figured you didn't know you
had it on
> and didn't want a flood of e-mail in return. So combine that with
the people
> who only read it on the Web (either at eGroups or via hotmail/yahoo
mail,
> etc.) or use a mailer with no RR capability, or have it turned off
> completely, my guess is your list numbers are just 10-15% of the
total list.
> Remember, 94.2% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
>
> Regards,
>
> Al Williams
> AWC
> * Expand your Stamp I/O: http://www.al-williams.com/awce
>
>
> >
Original Message
> > From: Ronald Anderson [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=5kTZ_FDNgBEFwlqxbfWTH9QEh-dqTGKvddbE9iMOS3UbfaRRYN-EvCbVr_vvQfAhs0D7f9CtClpJ8_epQKs]ronaldsa@e...[/url
> > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 2:52 AM
> > To: basicstamps@egroups.com
> > Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Re:Read Receipts
> >
> >
> > Sorry Guys,
> >
> > The receipt option was turned on and messages sent. Only after I
> > started getting return mail did I notice the receipt option was
on. My
> > apologies.
> >
> > Interesting thing to note, that the number of return receipts did
> > indicate this mailing group is not as big as everyone might think.
> > The actual number of people who are receiving mail on Stamps is
really
> > quite small.
> >
> > In large companies using a read receipt is not that uncommon.
> >
> > Well that's the story and I'm stickin to it! Ar, Ar!
> >
> > Ron
> >
> >
> >
Original Message
> > From: "Kevin" <kevco@g...>
> > To: <basicstamps@egroups.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 2:39 AM
> > Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Basic Stamp PLC Style Application Board
> >
> >
> > > Why is it whenever a message comes in from
> > > Ronald Anderson <ronaldsa@e...>
> > >
> > > the message request a notification when the
> > > message is read.
> > >
> > > Has anyone else noticed this??
> > >
> > > KC
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > I am wondering if anyone has any interest in a PLC style Basic
> > Stamp
> > > > II application board for use in industrial
automation/controls.
> > > >
> > > > If so attached are some photos of product that should be of
> > interest.
> > > >
> > > > This is an BSII controlling 8 inputs and 7 outputs with one
output
> > > > assigned to an LCD port. The inputs accept isolated 24 volts
> > signals,
> > > > NPN or PNP or discrete switches/sensors.
> > > > The 24 volt inputs are optoisolated. The outputs are rated for
> > 200ma
> > > > to 1 amp as open collector drivers. The board directly takes
in
> > 24vdc
> > > > to power up the BSII via a switching regulator and the same
24vdc
> > > > power is available via the 4 position terminals to power up
> > standard
> > > > proximity sensors, or photo-optic of either type, NPN or PNP
> > flavors.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone interested in using a Basic Stamp in an industrial
> > > > applications, please reply via this address.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Ron
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
You may well be correct on the size of the stamp group, however even
if this were true
and we lowered the percentage to perhaps even 5% when you receive only
some 25-30
return receipts the overall group is still quite small. This was my
meaning.
In any case, I'm back to the drawing board (figuratively speaking).
Ron
Original Message
From: "Al Williams" <alw@a...>
To: <basicstamps@egroups.com>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 2:11 PM
Subject: RE: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Re:Read Receipts
> Just my 2 cents. My mail program asks me if I want to send a return
and I
> always say no in a case like this -- I figured you didn't know you
had it on
> and didn't want a flood of e-mail in return. So combine that with
the people
> who only read it on the Web (either at eGroups or via hotmail/yahoo
mail,
> etc.) or use a mailer with no RR capability, or have it turned off
> completely, my guess is your list numbers are just 10-15% of the
total list.
> Remember, 94.2% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
>
> Regards,
>
> Al Williams
> AWC
> * Expand your Stamp I/O: http://www.al-williams.com/awce
>
>
> >
Original Message
> > From: Ronald Anderson [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=5kTZ_FDNgBEFwlqxbfWTH9QEh-dqTGKvddbE9iMOS3UbfaRRYN-EvCbVr_vvQfAhs0D7f9CtClpJ8_epQKs]ronaldsa@e...[/url
> > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 2:52 AM
> > To: basicstamps@egroups.com
> > Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Re:Read Receipts
> >
> >
> > Sorry Guys,
> >
> > The receipt option was turned on and messages sent. Only after I
> > started getting return mail did I notice the receipt option was
on. My
> > apologies.
> >
> > Interesting thing to note, that the number of return receipts did
> > indicate this mailing group is not as big as everyone might think.
> > The actual number of people who are receiving mail on Stamps is
really
> > quite small.
> >
> > In large companies using a read receipt is not that uncommon.
> >
> > Well that's the story and I'm stickin to it! Ar, Ar!
> >
> > Ron
> >
> >
> >
Original Message
> > From: "Kevin" <kevco@g...>
> > To: <basicstamps@egroups.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 2:39 AM
> > Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Basic Stamp PLC Style Application Board
> >
> >
> > > Why is it whenever a message comes in from
> > > Ronald Anderson <ronaldsa@e...>
> > >
> > > the message request a notification when the
> > > message is read.
> > >
> > > Has anyone else noticed this??
> > >
> > > KC
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > I am wondering if anyone has any interest in a PLC style Basic
> > Stamp
> > > > II application board for use in industrial
automation/controls.
> > > >
> > > > If so attached are some photos of product that should be of
> > interest.
> > > >
> > > > This is an BSII controlling 8 inputs and 7 outputs with one
output
> > > > assigned to an LCD port. The inputs accept isolated 24 volts
> > signals,
> > > > NPN or PNP or discrete switches/sensors.
> > > > The 24 volt inputs are optoisolated. The outputs are rated for
> > 200ma
> > > > to 1 amp as open collector drivers. The board directly takes
in
> > 24vdc
> > > > to power up the BSII via a switching regulator and the same
24vdc
> > > > power is available via the 4 position terminals to power up
> > standard
> > > > proximity sensors, or photo-optic of either type, NPN or PNP
> > flavors.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone interested in using a Basic Stamp in an industrial
> > > > applications, please reply via this address.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Ron
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
Comments
are people who have it set not to send them mail and they never read the
posts. I've always heard (on the old list) somewhere around 1000.
No big deal either way -- just a curiosity.
Regards,
Al Williams
AWC
*8 channels of pulse input or output with the PAK-VII and PAK-VIII:
http://www.al-williams.com/awce
>
Original Message
> From: Ronald Anderson [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=vo2EBWZUn0hBtQCBt5b3puqa0I4E0P70iMb2q7U9HvKz7kW9jVHrYVHYnc7qUloAW5CIUAmwRY0yu_T7pCtImhA]ronaldsa@e...[/url
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 3:20 AM
> To: basicstamps@egroups.com
> Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Re:Read Receipts/Size of Stamp Group
>
>
> Hi Al,
>
> You may well be correct on the size of the stamp group, however even
> if this were true
> and we lowered the percentage to perhaps even 5% when you receive only
> some 25-30
> return receipts the overall group is still quite small. This was my
> meaning.
>
> In any case, I'm back to the drawing board (figuratively speaking).
>
> Ron
>
>
>
Original Message
> From: "Al Williams" <alw@a...>
> To: <basicstamps@egroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 2:11 PM
> Subject: RE: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Re:Read Receipts
>
>
> > Just my 2 cents. My mail program asks me if I want to send a return
> and I
> > always say no in a case like this -- I figured you didn't know you
> had it on
> > and didn't want a flood of e-mail in return. So combine that with
> the people
> > who only read it on the Web (either at eGroups or via hotmail/yahoo
> mail,
> > etc.) or use a mailer with no RR capability, or have it turned off
> > completely, my guess is your list numbers are just 10-15% of the
> total list.
> > Remember, 94.2% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Al Williams
> > AWC
> > * Expand your Stamp I/O: http://www.al-williams.com/awce
> >
> >
> > >
Original Message
> > > From: Ronald Anderson [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=vo2EBWZUn0hBtQCBt5b3puqa0I4E0P70iMb2q7U9HvKz7kW9jVHrYVHYnc7qUloAW5CIUAmwRY0yu_T7pCtImhA]ronaldsa@e...[/url
> > > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 2:52 AM
> > > To: basicstamps@egroups.com
> > > Subject: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Re:Read Receipts
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry Guys,
> > >
> > > The receipt option was turned on and messages sent. Only after I
> > > started getting return mail did I notice the receipt option was
> on. My
> > > apologies.
> > >
> > > Interesting thing to note, that the number of return receipts did
> > > indicate this mailing group is not as big as everyone might think.
> > > The actual number of people who are receiving mail on Stamps is
> really
> > > quite small.
> > >
> > > In large companies using a read receipt is not that uncommon.
> > >
> > > Well that's the story and I'm stickin to it! Ar, Ar!
> > >
> > > Ron
> > >
> > >
> > >
Original Message
> > > From: "Kevin" <kevco@g...>
> > > To: <basicstamps@egroups.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 2:39 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Basic Stamp PLC Style Application Board
> > >
> > >
> > > > Why is it whenever a message comes in from
> > > > Ronald Anderson <ronaldsa@e...>
> > > >
> > > > the message request a notification when the
> > > > message is read.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone else noticed this??
> > > >
> > > > KC
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I am wondering if anyone has any interest in a PLC style Basic
> > > Stamp
> > > > > II application board for use in industrial
> automation/controls.
> > > > >
> > > > > If so attached are some photos of product that should be of
> > > interest.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is an BSII controlling 8 inputs and 7 outputs with one
> output
> > > > > assigned to an LCD port. The inputs accept isolated 24 volts
> > > signals,
> > > > > NPN or PNP or discrete switches/sensors.
> > > > > The 24 volt inputs are optoisolated. The outputs are rated for
> > > 200ma
> > > > > to 1 amp as open collector drivers. The board directly takes
> in
> > > 24vdc
> > > > > to power up the BSII via a switching regulator and the same
> 24vdc
> > > > > power is available via the 4 position terminals to power up
> > > standard
> > > > > proximity sensors, or photo-optic of either type, NPN or PNP
> > > flavors.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone interested in using a Basic Stamp in an industrial
> > > > > applications, please reply via this address.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Ron
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
of bandwidth. If you are trying to assess how large a list is, warn users
before sending a receipt-marked email.
I personally have the auto-send receipt feature turned off, and answer 'No'
when asked if I want to send one to someone who asked.
In most cases it's due to people having their mail program to automatically
mark messages with confirmation requests.
Cheers,
Mike
>
Mensaje original
> De: Ronald Anderson [noparse]/noparse]mailto:[url=http://forums.parallaxinc.com/group/basicstamps/post?postID=vNAFaxSU6W3Dj0VsPa8PcejqbXwP8n6FEzr2MfiKcA_cG8G26PcNW7K_lhC_uyWjJjv4yQfwrdMfTIt7]ronaldsa@e...[/url
> Enviado el: lunes, 03 de julio de 2000 10:20
> Para: basicstamps@egroups.com
> Asunto: [noparse][[/noparse]basicstamps] Re:Read Receipts/Size of Stamp Group
>
>
> Hi Al,
>
> You may well be correct on the size of the stamp group, however even
> if this were true
> and we lowered the percentage to perhaps even 5% when you receive only
> some 25-30
> return receipts the overall group is still quite small. This was my
> meaning.