Asking about SureLink 900 MHz RF(#30065) "Stand Alone Mode"
Stephanus
Posts: 4
My name is Stephanus. I have problem·with transmit and receive data using SureLink 900 MHz RF(#30065) "Stand Alone Mode". I have followed all the instruction in the mannual of SureLink 900 MHz RF(#30065) "Stand Alone Mode" but the data that I receive by using SureLink 900 MHz RF Module (#30065) "Point B" are not the same with the data that I transmit by using SureLink 900 MHz RF Module (#30065) "Point A".
Thank you for your help.
Thank you for your help.
Comments
EDIT: I just reread your post...are you sending data or pulses? If you are sending pulses you need to be in RC mode and use different pins.
Post Edited (cabojoe) : 8/21/2004 3:55:58 AM GMT
Now I am making my final project "Wireless Module for Barcode Scanner". The type of barcode scanner that I use is keyboard emulation interface and also two RF Module SureLink 900 MHz RF(#30065). I am planning to connect barcode scanner with wireless module(A) and transmitt the data to PC.I am also connect PC with wireless module(B). Then, wireless module(B) that connect with PC will receive data from wireless module(A). After that, if the data is correct, wireless module(B) will give confirmation to wireless module(A) that the data is correct. I am also planning to have many wireless module(A) and one wireless module(B) so I can have many barcode scanner and many wireless module(A) that can send data(barcode) to one wireless module(B) that connect with PC.
My question are:
1. RF Module SureLink 900 MHz RF(#30065) have many mode. I have reading the mannual, but I still confuse. For my case, wich mode should I use?
2. I am read in the manuall that the configuration memory in RF Module SureLink 900 MHz RF(#30065) can be program. Should I program the configuration memory if I use the mode in answer number 1?
3. If the configuration memory must be program, should I buy QuickLink Demo Board(#30066) to program the configuration memory of RF Module SureLink 900 MHz RF(#30065)?
Sorry for asking so much question. Once again, thank you very much for your help and attention.
2. The default jumper wiring for the Surelinks A and B in the manual is for cable mode.
3. I would advise you to get one Quicklink for the PC side. The Quicklink includes the rs-232 interface for your PC. So instead of·having to wire the pc side into·stand alone mode and adding an rs-232 interface,·you will simply adjust the jumpers on the Quicklink and plug it into your pc.·On the scanner end, you can either jumper the Surelink for stand alone mode as in the manual, or you can program it for stand alone operation using the Quicklink.
I purchased two Quicklink boards. I believe that·you ·could get by with just one. You need it for the pc interface, and with one Quicklink you can program either Surelink.
Let me know how it's going.
·
But, why when I am transmitting data using SureLink 900 MHz RF Module#30065 (point A) Stand alone mode at 2400 baud rate to SureLink 900 MHz RF Module#30065 (point Stand alone mode at 2400 baud rate, the data that received by SureLink 900 MHz RF Module#30065 (point still not the same with the data that transmitting by SureLink 900 MHz RF Module#30065 (point A).
Thanks for your help and attention.
My questions are:
- The data input/output are serial or TTL???
- Can I modify the programs loaded into stamps???
- I want to connect the Surelink 900Mhz RF module with a microcontroller, can I do it ????
Thank you for your help.
With the Quicklink board, the signal levels are RS-232 levels. When direct connected to the radio module, they are TTL levels. The Quicklink board is very useful if one radio will be connected to a PC, as has been pointed out. Also very handy to change the radio parameters.
With the standard Quicklinks,I don't think you can program due to issues with the reset required at the end of a download. But, there are one or two other suppliers who offer a modified RF link that can be used to program. Sorry, don't have the contact info. Try Google "RF Basic Stamp" .
I've used the Surelinks on several projects and they definitely are microcontroller friendly.
Regards