Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Impossible is nothing — Parallax Forums

Impossible is nothing

MicksterMickster Posts: 2,692
in General Discussion

Going from this

To these:

Car powered by water

Ship powered by seawater

Stanley Meyer spoke about having talked to the Japanese and the US Military.

Stan's method of breaking the covalent bond was never a hoax.

Funny how ITV's Channel 4 only ever aired this documentary one time and it has also been removed from YouTube.

It Runs on Water

Comments

  • DigitalBobDigitalBob Posts: 1,513

    All of the Meyer stuff is Fake. His whole theory is based on exciting the water molecule with the right frequency and it breaks apart. The same way you would excite a wine glass with sound and it breaks apart. You have to make the water conductive with KOH, then use DC to separate it. It takes more DC amps to do that, then the net yield of hydrogen in energy it produces.

  • MicksterMickster Posts: 2,692

    @DigitalBob said:
    All of the Meyer stuff is Fake. His whole theory is based on exciting the water molecule with the right frequency and it breaks apart. The same way you would excite a wine glass with sound and it breaks apart. You have to make the water conductive with KOH, then use DC to separate it. It takes more DC amps to do that, then the net yield of hydrogen in energy it produces.

    Meyer didn't use DC. He used high voltage @ ~22KHz. Things have changed a bit since 1833 :)

  • DigitalBobDigitalBob Posts: 1,513

    Never said he did. DC and KOH is the correct method.

  • MicksterMickster Posts: 2,692

    @DigitalBob said:
    Never said he did. DC and KOH is the correct method.

    OK, I'll let you explain to the US Navy, Toyota and countless others who are producing copious amounts of hydrogen - using negligible power - in their own experiments that it's just a figment of their imagination.

  • Beau SchwabeBeau Schwabe Posts: 6,566

    Did anyone catch in the video towards the end where they were making A B tests, sensing temperature differences down to a thousandth of a degree or so, that the "test" apparatus was supported with Popsicle sticks and duct tape? .... That's like driving the top of the line sports car with turn of the century wooden wagon wheels.

  • DigitalBobDigitalBob Posts: 1,513

    It’s called the conservation of energy. You never produce more energy than you’re inputting, it only transfers and decays. Joule, Von Mayer, Von Helmholtz are turning in their graves.

  • MicksterMickster Posts: 2,692

    @DigitalBob said:
    It’s called the conservation of energy. You never produce more energy than you’re inputting, it only transfers and decays. Joule, Von Mayer, Von Helmholtz are turning in their graves.

    And Tesla is saying "What the heck took you so long...told you a thousand times that everything is about frequency".

  • DigitalBobDigitalBob Posts: 1,513

    Tesla did dabble resonant frequency inventions, however this still can "Not" be use to break the bond of the H2O molecule.

  • Beau SchwabeBeau Schwabe Posts: 6,566

    I think Tesla's' angle was to use the Earth's ionosphere to transmit and receive electrical energy

    On a similar note, does anyone remember the "Tether Experiment" in the 1980's and 1990's? This experiment was to turn the Earth's magnetic field into a dynamo and "feed" the ionosphere with this power. The first experiment failed as a mechanical release of the tether got jammed. The second was a success at first, but then ended in failure as the current produced melted the tether.

    https://pwg.gsfc.nasa.gov/Education/wtether.html

Sign In or Register to comment.