Looking for IRED/photodiode pair: 4260nm.
Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi)
Posts: 23,514
I'm looking for an IRED/photodiode pair with a peak wavelength emitter/response of 4260nm. An identical IRED for sensing, instead of the photodiode, would also be acceptable. I'm planning to modulate the IRED, so the detector should have a moderately short response time.
I've been approached by a senior at the local high school, looking for a mentor and a senior project (a graduation requirement in Washington State). One idea I have is a from-the-ground-up CO2 sensor.
Any ideas/sources?
Thanks!
-Phil
I've been approached by a senior at the local high school, looking for a mentor and a senior project (a graduation requirement in Washington State). One idea I have is a from-the-ground-up CO2 sensor.
Any ideas/sources?
Thanks!
-Phil
Comments
They sell the LEDs, both for CO2 and for compensation in a dual wavelength scheme.
Here is another LED supplier.
http://www.lasermonitoring.co.uk/IR LED's.html
I don't know the company, but the page has some good advice.
Here is a nice article
https://www.analog.com/en/analog-dialogue/articles/complete-gas-sensor-circuit-using-nondispersive-infrared.html
It uses a traditional white light through interference filters onto a differential thermopile. They have a nice presentation of the issues. The whole enchilada has its power-hungry lamp, filters and thermopile and really adds up in complexity and cost. Yes another exotic technique now becoming popular uses the photoacoustic response.
Thanks,
-Phil
You're a fountainhead of knowledge, as usual. My main objective is to keep it as simple as possible for someone of high-school-level capabilities. My thought was to modulate the IRED and AC-couple the detector output to a receiver like the one I used for receiving radio stations with the Prop. I don't think an op-amp would even be necessary.
I know that dual-channel NDIRs are the way to go for accuracy and longevity, but for a high school project, proof of principle with a single channel should be adequate. There's still plenty of neat physics to explore.
Thanks!
-Phil