P2 Eval Board Owners, I need your help!
cgracey
Posts: 14,153
in Propeller 2
P2 Eval Board Owners, I need your help!
Could you please unplug the USB cable and remove all the jumpers on your P2 Eval board that surround the P2 chip? Also, remove all accessory boards from the 2x6 headers. Then, could you please measure the resistances between each Vxxxx pin and GND?
The Vxxxx pins are the 2nd and 5th pins on each 1x6 male header that surrounds the P2. It doesn't matter which side you count from. They are the V's in this pattern: IVIIVI
I would think the negative meter probe would go to GND (any of those four GND posts) and the positive meter probe would go to the Vxxxx pin header pin being measured. You'll need to measure with the VIO pin being subjected to the positive voltage. Otherwise, you may wind up measuring the clamp diode to GND, which we don't care about.
If you could report your measurements as such, it would be most helpful:
V0007 = ? ohms
V0815 = ? ohms
V1623 = ? ohms
V2431 = ? ohms
V3239 = ? ohms
V4047 = ? ohms
V4855 = ? ohms
V5663 = ? ohms
We have some trouble with the new silicon, where some VIO pins are shorted to GND (5..20 ohms), somewhat randomly. I am really wondering if the old silicon exhibits these characteristics, at all.
THANK YOU!!!
Could you please unplug the USB cable and remove all the jumpers on your P2 Eval board that surround the P2 chip? Also, remove all accessory boards from the 2x6 headers. Then, could you please measure the resistances between each Vxxxx pin and GND?
The Vxxxx pins are the 2nd and 5th pins on each 1x6 male header that surrounds the P2. It doesn't matter which side you count from. They are the V's in this pattern: IVIIVI
I would think the negative meter probe would go to GND (any of those four GND posts) and the positive meter probe would go to the Vxxxx pin header pin being measured. You'll need to measure with the VIO pin being subjected to the positive voltage. Otherwise, you may wind up measuring the clamp diode to GND, which we don't care about.
If you could report your measurements as such, it would be most helpful:
V0007 = ? ohms
V0815 = ? ohms
V1623 = ? ohms
V2431 = ? ohms
V3239 = ? ohms
V4047 = ? ohms
V4855 = ? ohms
V5663 = ? ohms
We have some trouble with the new silicon, where some VIO pins are shorted to GND (5..20 ohms), somewhat randomly. I am really wondering if the old silicon exhibits these characteristics, at all.
THANK YOU!!!
Comments
On my Eval, with all VIO jumpers removed, and VDD powered, I measure that ~10mA can flow out of V2431, (V2431 to mA meter to GND)
The fluke measures with an open circuit voltage around 0.74v, whereas the above was with a benchtop dmm which uses around 2.6v. That might explain the difference.
That's good. Thanks for checking those. I'm wondering if we'll see anything really low-impedance out there.
V0007 = >4.0 volts
V0815 = 2.50 volts
V1623 = 2.34 volts
V2431 = 1.84 volts
V3239 = 2.42 volts
V4047 = 2.57 volts
V4855 = 1.62 volts
V5663 = >4.0 volts
Kind regards, Samuel Lourenço
We could still use more data, if anyone reading this has a P2 Eval and hasn't taken these measurements, yet.
All Vabcd pins go almost immediately to very high impedance except V1623 which stays around 7M ohm
V0815 = >20 M Ohm
V1623 = >20 M Ohm
V2431 = >20 M Ohm
V3239 = >20 M Ohm
V4047 = >20 M Ohm
V4855 = >20 M Ohm
V5663 = >20 M Ohm
Measurements taken with a TENMA 72-050 ('1988 "improved series". At the time, the ohmic scale being able to reach up to 20 MOhm was one of the upgrades, when compared to the first lots of that series ('1987)).
Old, for sure, but faithful as Yellowstone's geyser.
V0815 = 10M ohms
V1623 = 15M ohms
V2431 = 9M ohms
V3239 = 10M ohms
V4047 = 8M ohms
V4855 = 9M ohms
V5663 = 9M ohms
Who else?
final settled values when .01M digit held for at least 5 sec:
V0007 = 5.53 M ohms
V0815 = 6.12 M ohms
V1623 = 8.25 M ohms
V2431 = 6.56 M ohms
V3239 = 5.25 M ohms
V4047 = 6.08 M ohms
V4855 = 5.44 M ohms
V5663 = 5.92 M ohms
Double checked and all readings repeat to within .01 M.
Edit: Scratch that. Might be the pin fet reacting to measurement voltages.
So, it looks, so far, like we don't have any ohmic connections between the VIOs and GNDs on any of the first-silicon chips.
That's good!
This suggests that something was just screwy in this last silicon run. The only change to the pad ring was the PLL filter settings, which wouldn't have had such effects, and only connects to V2431, anyway.
All measure in the range of 1M to 5M. Mostly close to 3Mohms.
dgately
Here, I've been able to repeatedly walk thru each 8-pin round, and did still found all the pins at higher than 6~7 MOhm, each turn. It's only a matter of doing it at a fast pace.
So, at least in my EVAL board, P2 and surounding circuitry current leakage was found to be extremelly low.
0007 2.5M
0815 3.6M
1623 2.7M
2431 2.8M
3239 1.9M
4047 3.0M
4855 3.0M
5663 3.4M
It seems pretty certain that the original silicon didn't have any short issues on the VIO pins.
With leads reversed got 234 to 266 kOhms on all.
With plus lead on pin, most read OL but some read ~1.5 volts