Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
New P2 Silicon Observations - Page 21 — Parallax Forums

New P2 Silicon Observations

11718192123

Comments

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    edited 2018-11-18 05:33
    Cluso99 wrote: »
    Can anyone pick what is wrong with this?

    Just by looking at the hex dump (ctrl-M) of Pasm, it is putting a relative address into the LOC. It works if you use the back-slash to force an absolute address.

    LOC would always want an absolute address I'd think. Maybe that should be changed in Pasm.

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    edited 2018-11-18 05:57
    RDLONG can't do relative so this works:
                    setq2   #16-1
                    rdlong  lut_start,#@palette
    

    EDIT: And, because ORGH is declaring it as hubram, you don't even need the @
                    setq2   #16-1
                    rdlong  lut_start,#palette
    
  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    Here's something amusing:
    con
      lut_start = 0
    
    dat
    org  0
                    loc     ptra,#\palette
                    setq2   #16-1
                    rdlong  lut_start,ptra
    
                    jmp     #$
    
    
    orgf  $1f0
    orgh  $400
    '====================================================================
    '24 bit color format = rr_gg_bb_00
    '====================================================================
    palette         long    0               'black 
                    long    $0000aa00       'blue 
                    long    $00aa0000       'green 
                    long    $00aaaa00       'cyan 
                    long    $aa000000       'red 
                    long    $aa00aa00       'magenta 
                    long    $aa550000       'brown 
                    long    $aaaaaa00       'gray 
                    long    $55555500       'dark gray 
                    long    $5555ff00       'bright blue 
                    long    $55ff5500       'bright green 
                    long    $55ffff00       'bright cyan 
                    long    $ff555500       'bright red 
                    long    $ff55ff00       'bright magenta 
                    long    $ffff5500       'yellow 
                    long    $ffffff00       'white 
    '====================================================================
    
  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    Cluso99 wrote: »
    Can anyone pick what is wrong with this?

    The orgh $400 works but just a plain orgh does not. The palette is <$400.
    I can change the $400 -> $404, $600, etc and it works fine, but if I make it $300 it fails.

    Hmm, experimenting with ORGH $100, even as relative addressing, there is something wrong with what Pasm is generating by the looks of the hex dump:
    00000- FC 03 D0 FE 29 1E 64 FD 00 01 04 FB FC FF 9F FD   '....).d.........'
    00010- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    00020- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    00030- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    00040- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    00050- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    00060- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    00070- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    00080- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    00090- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    000A0- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    000B0- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    000C0- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    000D0- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    000E0- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    000F0- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   '................'
    00100- 00 00 00 00 00 AA 00 00 00 00 AA 00 00 AA AA 00   '................'
    00110- 00 00 00 AA 00 AA 00 AA 00 00 55 AA 00 AA AA AA   '..........U.....'
    00120- 00 55 55 55 00 FF 55 55 00 55 FF 55 00 FF FF 55   '.UUU..UU.U.U...U'
    00130- 00 55 55 FF 00 FF 55 FF 00 55 FF FF 00 FF FF FF   '.UU...U..U......'
    

    First machine code is $fed003fc. I read that as relative address $3fc. $0fc would be more like it.

  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    If palette is <$400 then #@palette and #palette give incorrect results...

    #\palette is the only one to always give the correct result.
    DAT
                    orgh    0
                    org     0
    entry
                    loc     ptra,#@palette                  ' wrong!!! relative
                    loc     ptra,#palette                   ' wrong!!!
                    loc     ptra,#\palette                  ' correct use of absolute hub address :)
    here            jmp     #here
    
    DAT
                    orgh 
    '====================================================================
    '24 bit color format = rr_gg_bb_00
    '====================================================================
    palette         long    0               'black 
                    long    $0000aa00       'blue 
                    long    $00aa0000       'green 
                    long    $00aaaa00       'cyan 
                    long    $aa000000       'red 
                    long    $aa00aa00       'magenta 
                    long    $aa550000       'brown 
                    long    $aaaaaa00       'gray 
                    long    $55555500       'dark gray 
                    long    $5555ff00       'bright blue 
                    long    $55ff5500       'bright green 
                    long    $55ffff00       'bright cyan 
                    long    $ff555500       'bright red 
                    long    $ff55ff00       'bright magenta 
                    long    $ffff5500       'yellow 
                    long    $ffffff00       'white 
    '====================================================================
    
  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    edited 2018-11-18 08:00
    I think you've stumbled upon at least one bug in Pasm as well.
  • That's the way it's always been with Pnut.
    Pnut interprets addresses below $400 as COG/LUT addresses.


  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    edited 2018-11-18 10:11
    Brian,
    It's not that either. Cluso's original source of LOC ptra,#@palette produced $3c. At the time I assumed it was relative addressing but it's not correct for that. There's an extraneous leading "3", assuming relative hub addressing.

    Have a read of that dump above. The first code is a LOC instruction as per Cluso's example. I'm using ORGH $100 instead of $400.

    The resulting address appears to be $3fc, which is way too high and, again, has an extraneous leading "3" for relative hub addressing. If it was assembling as absolute cog addressing then the address should have been $40. If relative cog addressing then it should have been $3f. If absolute hub addressing then it should have been $100. If relative hub addressing then it should have been $fc.

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    Err, I probably should be saying Pnut rather than Pasm.
  • I think this is why pnut has trouble.
    Consider the following code.
    DAT		org
    
    barney		jmp	#fred
    		nop
    fred		jmp	#barney
    
    Pnut generates the following output.
    00000- 04 00 90 FD 00 00 00 00 F4 FF 9F FD 27 96 80 FF   '............'...'
    

    Notice the relative offsets need to be shifted right 2 places to be cog/lut offsets.
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    It is worse than this. Definitely a pnut problem!
    DAT
                    org     0
                    ....
                    loc     pa,#@gfx                        '\ launch graphics demo
                    coginit #16,pa                          '/
                    ....
    '====================================================================
                    orgh    $400              ' REQUIRED TO BE >=$400
                    org     0
    gfx             jmp     #demo             'launch hubexec code
    
    This requires not only #@gfx to be used, but gfx code must be >=$400

    I had problems with the ROM code. We solved it at the time although I was not convinced of the solution. It was probably that the ROM code resides in $FC000... so thankfully it worked.
  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    Oh, okay, so the machine coding for branching is effectively hub addressing all the time. Cool.

    Doesn't fix my example of $3fc though. It should have been $fc.

    Here's the source:
    con
      lut_start = 0
    
    dat
    org  0
                    loc     ptra,#palette
                    setq2   #16-1
                    rdlong  lut_start,ptra
    
                    jmp     #$
    
    orgh  $100
    '====================================================================
    '24 bit color format = rr_gg_bb_00
    '====================================================================
    palette         long    0               'black 
                    long    $0000aa00       'blue 
                    long    $00aa0000       'green 
                    long    $00aaaa00       'cyan 
                    long    $aa000000       'red 
                    long    $aa00aa00       'magenta 
                    long    $aa550000       'brown 
                    long    $aaaaaa00       'gray 
                    long    $55555500       'dark gray 
                    long    $5555ff00       'bright blue 
                    long    $55ff5500       'bright green 
                    long    $55ffff00       'bright cyan 
                    long    $ff555500       'bright red 
                    long    $ff55ff00       'bright magenta 
                    long    $ffff5500       'yellow 
                    long    $ffffff00       'white 
    '====================================================================
    
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    For reference, here is test code that I used to verify the results.
    Note that I am using the ROM monitor and serial code to display the results, and then I call the monitor so that I can examine cog/lut/hub memory.

    pnut will compile it as a spin file or you can rename it spin2.
  • This has been brought up several times over the last couple of years.
    Need to find some of the old posts on this.
    IIRC Chip said this was a bit of a headache.

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    edited 2018-11-18 11:05
    ozpropdev wrote: »
    IIRC Chip said this was a bit of a headache.

    Okay, no problem. Sounds like it'll be sorted out when Pnut is replaced.

  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    I just spent a whole day on this problem. Because it is inconsistent, changing from #\xxx to #@xxx fixed one problem and caused another.

    What concerns me more though, is it could cause a problem in the ROM and that could be a disaster :(
  • p2asm assembles the same too;
    
                       DAT
    00000                              orgh    0
    00000 000                          org     0
    00000 000          entry
    00000 000 fed0003c                 loc     ptra,#@palette                  ' wrong!!! relative
    00004 001 fed00038                 loc     ptra,#palette                   ' wrong!!!
    00008 002 fec00010                 loc     ptra,#\palette                  ' correct use of absolute hub address :)
    0000c 003 fd9ffffc here            jmp     #here
                       
                       DAT
    00010                              orgh
                       '====================================================================
                       '24 bit color format = rr_gg_bb_00
                       '====================================================================
    00010     00000000 palette         long    0               'black
    00014     0000aa00                 long    $0000aa00       'blue
    00018     00aa0000                 long    $00aa0000       'green
    0001c     00aaaa00                 long    $00aaaa00       'cyan
    00020     aa000000                 long    $aa000000       'red
    00024     aa00aa00                 long    $aa00aa00       'magenta
    00028     aa550000                 long    $aa550000       'brown
    0002c     aaaaaa00                 long    $aaaaaa00       'gray
    00030     55555500                 long    $55555500       'dark gray
    00034     5555ff00                 long    $5555ff00       'bright blue
    00038     55ff5500                 long    $55ff5500       'bright green
    0003c     55ffff00                 long    $55ffff00       'bright cyan
    00040     ff555500                 long    $ff555500       'bright red
    00044     ff55ff00                 long    $ff55ff00       'bright magenta
    00048     ffff5500                 long    $ffff5500       'yellow
    0004c     ffffff00                 long    $ffffff00       'white
                       '====================================================================
    
  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    Cluso,
    Stop using LOC. It doesn't seem to be a benefit for what you are doing.
    MOV lmm_x, ##gfx ' will always give an absolute address and takes same code space as LOC + MOV.
  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    I don't think LOC has any real use for a PC-relative mode at all. Changing the assemblers to only encoding absolute addresses will probably solve Chip's headache.
  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    Oh, wow, Brian, you've used LOC a lot in that logic analyser program.
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    edited 2018-11-18 12:54
    Chip uses loc everywhere.
    It's in the VGA programs that I think Chip wrote originally.

    That's what I am working on, but every time I moved something it broke :(

    BTW loc is a single instruction, not 2 as in mov xx,##xxx.
    Just realised what you meant. No, that LOC + MOV was just so I could see what LOC was doing. It's regularly loading up PTRA/PTRB.
  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    edited 2018-11-18 14:19
    Turns out the using @ in hubexec will also mess it up when the label's address is >= $400. It seems to me that
    loc     ptra, #\label
    
    is the safe bet.

    I'm guessing non-LOC instructions are the ones that have problems with backslash.

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    edited 2018-11-18 14:59
    I've just done a blanket search&replace on Brian's LA program and aside from the LOC's preceding the three COGINIT's every LOC that was using an @ now uses a \

    Seems to run fine. I've actually plugged in a VGA monitor now, didn't think about it before, and can get INFO and RUN buttons to trigger the display.

  • jmgjmg Posts: 15,172
    hmm ... Is anyone else thinking this P2ASM syntax-chaff needs some (re)work, if it confuses even seasoned programmers ?
  • No.
  • I will be frank. A lot of the proposed solutions are really ugly. What we have here is only confusing because we haven't visited the discussion for a while, nor was it presented or documented cleanly at the time. We should do those things first before doing anything else.
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    Potatohead,
    No. The use is inconsistent so it’s a pnut bug.
    When I last fell foul of it we were trying to get the rom to onsemi.
    We just need a consistent way to override its use.
  • Yes, we've got a bug there. Sorting that out is a very different thing from what jmg has proposed many, many times.

  • evanhevanh Posts: 15,862
    edited 2018-11-18 23:38
    Okay, the reason why #\ doesn't always work is because it generates a label's address with respect to an issued ORG rather than always a hubram address of the loaded code. An ORGH brings it right. This will be as intended.

    So, #@ is meant to be the be-all for forcing an address to a label as first loaded to hubram. Sadly, #@ when used on a LOC instruction will inappropriately generate a PC-relative address if pnut perceives the label to be in the same addressing domain as the executing code.

    What's interesting is this mechanism is fine for encoding branch instructions directly. It's only a problem for LOC. Basically, LOC has no purpose supporting relative addressing.

  • I think this has come up before. For a label "foo" that's in hub, "#@foo" and "#foo" mean exactly the same thing: "@x" means "the hub value of x", so if x is already a hub address then there's no difference.

    "#\foo" is the syntax to use if you want to force an absolute (not relative) address
    "#\@foo" is the syntax to use if you want to force an absolute hub address, even if "foo" is defined in COG

    It's confusing because we're used to thinking of "@foo" as "the address of foo", which implies an absolute address. But "@foo" just means "use the hub value for label foo" and implies nothing about whether absolute or relative addressing will be used.

    PNut, p2asm, and fastspin all agree on this, AFAICT.

Sign In or Register to comment.