Welcome to the Parallax Discussion Forums, sign-up to participate.
Peter Jakacki wrote: »
The compact version of TAQOZ in ROM is mainly for hardware debugging but of course could also be used to program the prop without any other tools other than a terminal and perhaps an editor.
The TAQOZ in taking about is the extended version that will go on being extended. When i said it is not one of the P2 languages, i meant it is not mentioned officially. When i question the future of it, this had to do with how it is to be used. If i am the only one writing and documenting and using it then it doesn't make any sense to waste all that extra effort catering for users and trying to promote it.
I see that my commercial products will take up a lot of my time and i could just concentrate on that. Is anybody actually interested in using it? I see lots and lots of excitement over various languages but I'm primarily interested in what i can do with the P2.
MJB wrote: »
I am sitting here on the sideline watching until there is a P2D2 with motherboard from you (with Internet via WiZ5500/ESP32)
... with the final P2 on it until I will have HW to play with and being able to contribute.
But no commercial projects from me.
My workhorse will still be P1+Tachyon for most things as this is powerful enough.
And as you I am really wondering how much is going on in the C-Threads and
how few seem to pick up TaqOS for real work, as it is clearly the most
powerful P2 programming environment to date.
People would not even be at the mercy of a compiler writer
having access to the full TaqOS source - thank YOU
being in FULL control of all there is happening.