Cubiio laser engraver
Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi)
Posts: 23,514
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/880456201/cubiio-the-most-compact-laser-engraver
Anybody think this is a good idea? I don't believe the developers have thought very far through the obvious product liability issues. Then there's this statement: "Of course, the details of virtual lens algorithm are patented and confidential." If it's patented, it's not confidential. 'Can't have it both ways.
Still, they've been pledged 3400% of their $25K goal. We'll see if they can deliver and what happens after that. Besides, what could possibly go wrong?
-Phil
Anybody think this is a good idea? I don't believe the developers have thought very far through the obvious product liability issues. Then there's this statement: "Of course, the details of virtual lens algorithm are patented and confidential." If it's patented, it's not confidential. 'Can't have it both ways.
Still, they've been pledged 3400% of their $25K goal. We'll see if they can deliver and what happens after that. Besides, what could possibly go wrong?
-Phil
Comments
No more dangerous than a wood-burning tool.
As for danger. If it's going to shut down on movement, the risks are on par with other tools.
Phil's point is well taken. If it's patented they had to disclose the invention. If their invention requires an additional element not disclosed in order to behave in the manner described in the claim(s), the patent office will not look favorably upon this. If they are relying on a patented (and therefore publicly disclosed) algorithm PLUS a trade secret enhancement, their choice of wording is poor and simply invites this kind of skepticism.
Who cares? They have almost a million dollars in the bank.
Not bad going.
It's like everything else, we are the crash dummies. No clinical trials, no controlled testing with a volunteer test group.
Your it, I think it's crazy, but maybe they will sell good and be able to off-set legal problems.
Good old Ralpf Nader, still working hard for the little guy.
https://nader.org/
That number can attract a good lawyer or two.
Woohoo, I am above "typical", lol. I am rather spoiled with a 24"x36" bed and 12" depth for material on my Epilog Legend EXT 75 watt CO2 laser.
I also find it interesting how they mention safety and that it comes with goggles, yet not a single person is shown wearing them in the video. Also, they don't show the alignment process in the main video.
Wonder if their "virtual lens algorithm" was hijacked from Algolux....
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/4001280705/algolux-aims-to-simplify-lens-design-through-computational-imaging
Curiously enough, it is the Food and Drug Administration that has authority over regulating lasers and their use in the United States, and they have quite wide latitude in preventing a device like this from even being imported. There are too many eBay sellers of overpowered lasers to catch them all, but a KS project like this is bound to raisetheir attention.
The KS listing does say they are seeking FDA certification, but it's far from a sure bet they'll get it, and to become compliant will almost certainly add to the cost. Being portable and not enclosed, the device might be considered like a laser light show projector, which requires variances for each user. That'll be fun.
http://www.funraniumlabs.com/2017/08/laser-products-hate/