Virus concern
Seairth
Posts: 2,474
I just downloaded 32220-PropScope-USB-Software-207.zip, and Windows Defender immediately warned that it contained the trojan "Win32/Rundas.B". Can someone at Parallax confirm whether this is a false positive?
Edit: Good news. It seems to have been a false positive. After the next virus definition update installed, Defender no longer saw it as a threat. If you encounter a similar issue, just make sure the checksum matches the ones listed below.
Edit: Nope. I downloaded the wrong version. When I download the version in question, with the new definition file, I still get the warning.
Edit: Good news. It seems to have been a false positive. After the next virus definition update installed, Defender no longer saw it as a threat. If you encounter a similar issue, just make sure the checksum matches the ones listed below.
Edit: Nope. I downloaded the wrong version. When I download the version in question, with the new definition file, I still get the warning.
Comments
Came up clean.
Any chance your download interrupted before the end? Maybe try downloading again?
Edit: 205 downloads just fine. It seems to be only 207 that Defender doesn't like.
I get this...
The "%ProgramFiles%\Windows Defender\MpCmdRun.exe" version is:
I believe I was using AVG Free at the time.
OK, so the files could be packaged outside Parallax.
AFAIK, Hanno used Visual-Studio to develop his code. For one MS product to false-fail another is a tad concerning. Perhaps there's some "special" sealed 3rd party libraries included, which are causing the flag-waving.
That appears to be the same for me (thread definition file is 1.247.388.0).
Edit: I get the same behavior if I download with Edge instead of Chrome, so it doesn't appear to be something the browser is doing.
And, unfortunately, Defender is just unilaterally deleting the download, so I can't take a closer look at it.
Also, if I test the URL through Kaspersky's online scanner (and a few others), it reports clean.
Edit: I'm getting hashes ending with E9DF77DC for the exe and FF49033D for the zip.
I think this is why Defender has an issue with it. It has something to do with the archive, the .exe itself passes Defender scans.
I just noticed you said the checksums match, I thought you said they didn't. Nevermind me...
Could that be something? I don't have WinRAR installed on my machine; rather 7z instead. Playing "spot the difference" here
@Seairth What zip software do you get listed by Defender in the fail-report?
Hmm.... Doesn't Win10 had it's own unzipper.... why would Defender even use WinRAR for that?
*sigh*2
If I make my own zip of the .exe Defender has no issues with it. Something about the original compression method sets off defender, it has nothing to do with the .exe file, only the way it was compressed. I guess you could say Defender has a role in it as well.
Arg, I had Defender off. Nevermind me *2
Moral: AVG is just paid false advertising.