Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Weight Drawn Rotation - How To? — Parallax Forums

Weight Drawn Rotation - How To?

Wasnt sure exactly where to go with this question...
I want to rotate what basically looks like a 2ft tall ferris wheel. Weight about 5lbs, very low friction as it will be well balanced on skateboard 'speedbearings'.
The idea is to put magnets on the 'ferris wheel', and around it.... stationary, custom wound coils... so it is now a generator.
To drive the wheels rotation, I want to use gravity.... Just like a cuckoo/grandfather clock.

So my question is... how can I create a gearing system to translate roughly 10lbs to 300rpm with an estimated time to drop of 5feet in 24hrs?
I do not know how to determine rotational torque to drive the wheel or drag coefficient of the bearings or any other equations....
The wheel weighs approx 5-6lbs, planning to use fastest and lowest friction skateboard bearings I could find = 'Bones Swiss Ceramics'.
The weight and rpm are completely fabricated, I do not know yet exactly what RPM I need and there is not a predetermined weight... looking to determine that as well (best weight for this wheel).
I believe it would be best to have the highest rpm possible... but, initial manufacturing methods will be lower tolerance which will reduce the stable max rpm

I just cant figure out where to start on this one... I did some research on clocks and the pendulum method was about the closest I could find... but I believe that would cause an unstable rotational speed (constant rpm).
hoping there would be a simple gear reduction box I could make, but theres just too many variables involved for me to figure out.
I'm more than willing to do the math and research... but I need guidance.
Thanks in advance :)

Comments

  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    This is all far to vague. We have a wheel, some magnets, some weights etc. All pretty much unspecified.

    The only concrete thing I can get hold of here is that the end result is that it should be a generator powered by falling weights.

    Interesting idea. What is missing then is an ide about how much power this generator is expected to produce? With out that information it is impossible to even start to think may be required in a solution.

    Coincidentally, I was in the Berlin Science Museum a few days back. There I saw a big old church clock mechanism, you know, three hundred years old and made of cast iron. It was powered by some big rocks tied to a rope hanging down from it. The two meter long pendulum controls it's speed through a complicated looking escapement mechanism. So certainly one can get power from falling weights over 24 hours, we have been doing it for hundreds of years! Speed regulation is pretty good. You are not going to get much power out of such a thing though.


  • 300 rpm = 432,000 revolutions in a 24 hour period. That seems to be a good starting place for calculations to begin.
    Jim
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2016-12-07 14:29
    300rpm is 5 revs per second.

    One could probably regulate that with a pendulum or other escape mechanism. Sounds pretty fiddly and complicated to make and probably would not last very long before wearing out if any significant power is wanted out of it.

    One could gear the thing down a lot and drive a generator, a motor in reverse, by having a load on the motor the rate of fall would be slowed. One could measure the speed and vary the load on the motor to regulate it. Perhaps not very efficient.



  • guess i should have left the magnets and the generator part out.

    lets start over:
    How can I make a 10lb weight turn a shaft at a continuous 300rpm via gearbox so the weight can be redrawn every day?
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2016-12-07 15:37
    Same way a clock does. Use an escapement: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escapement. There are many to choose from. Kind of fiddly and potentially liable to wear out over time. I kind of like the grass hopper escapement https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grasshopper_escapement.

    If accuracy is not so important one speed regulator I saw in a wind up musical box used air resistance to limit the speed of spinning. Basically a shaft had some vanes on it that had to work against the air as the shaft was turned. Simple, reliable.

    How far can this weight fall? Two meters perhaps?

    What is this for actually?
  • MikeDYurMikeDYur Posts: 2,176
    edited 2016-12-07 17:14
    JBWolf wrote: »
    guess i should have left the magnets and the generator part out.

    lets start over:
    How can I make a 10lb weight turn a shaft at a continuous 300rpm via gearbox so the weight can be redrawn every day?

    This isn't a microcontroller problem?

    You would need a clock movement made of wood. I know I have seen instances of them on the web.


    EDIT: This looks like a nice find.

    https://wooden-gear-clocks.com/


    Here's a grasshopper escapement.

    https://wooden-gear-clocks.com/tranquilityclock/
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    Ah, yes, that where it gets interesting. It could well be a micro-controller problem.

    A typical good old escapement has some kind of wheel driven by the power source. Be that weights on a rope or a spring. That wheel has some kind of teeth on it that engages with a mechanism that let's it "tick-tock" around. That mechanism is often using a pendulum to get the timing right.

    So, what if we throw away the pendulum and drive the 'tick-tock' mechanism from a micro-controller? Whose timing is maintained by a nice accurate crystal.

    So basically what we have is a micro-controller system that is "harvesting" the energy it needs to run from the energy stored in the suspended weight. Presumably via some moving magnet pushing electrical energy into a coil. In return the micro-controller is providing the accurate timing and speed control.

    And perhaps there is energy left over for this whole gizmo to drive something else. Which might even make it useful.

    In short, perhaps we can state the problem as: How can we power a micro-controller from a falling rock ?



  • Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi)Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi) Posts: 23,514
    edited 2016-12-07 18:01
    This project will definitely require an escapement or some other feedback mechanism to keep the wheel from accelerating out of control. An escape wheel coupled with a pendulum is a beautiful thing, BTW. The pendulum regulates the rotational speed of the escape wheel, and the beveled teeth of the escape wheel provide a nudge to the pendulum with each tick and tock to keep it from running down.

    You could dispense with the wheel altogether and couple your coils and magnets to the pendulum itself.

    -Phil
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    Yes, Phil. An escapement is a beautiful thing.

    Only my suggestion was to do away with the mechanical pendulum and use the crystal "pendulum" of a micro-controller.

    I don't have a sensible suggestion as to how that could be done yet. I'm just hoping it could simplify the mechanics and make it a lot more reliable and accurate.

    Like I said, an MCU powered by a falling rock!.



  • jmgjmg Posts: 15,173
    edited 2016-12-07 20:30
    JBWolf wrote: »
    How can I make a 10lb weight turn a shaft at a continuous 300rpm via gearbox so the weight can be redrawn every day?
    Short answer: With just a weight and rotating mass, you can't.

    The weight delivers a force, and force cannot deliver constant angular velocity.

    You can eventually get to some terminal velocity, when the system forces plus air-resistance equals your injected force, but at that point, you can extract no energy yourself.

    Adding stuff like escapements, waste a lot of energy.
    JBWolf wrote: »
    guess i should have left the magnets and the generator part out.
    On the contrary, those are actually the ideal way to provide that balancing force needed to regulate the RPM.
    As the generator extract energy, it provides a reverse torque-by varying how much energy if extracts, you can vary that torque.

    JBWolf wrote: »
    I believe it would be best to have the highest rpm possible... but, initial manufacturing methods will be lower tolerance which will reduce the stable max rpm
    Generators are velocity driven, but you do need to keep well below air resistance losses, so that it is you that extracts the energy, not the air.
    ie the focus should be on the lowest-speed generators.

    Did you look at Washing Machine motors ?
    JBWolf wrote: »
    The weight and rpm are completely fabricated, I do not know yet exactly what RPM I need and there is not a predetermined weight... looking to determine that as well (best weight for this wheel).

    You can work back, from the energy you actually need.
    Taking some rounded metric numbers, a 51kg weight moving 2 metres, delivers ~ 1000 J (J=watt-second)
    Put another way, that is 277mW for one hour, or 11.5mW for 24 hours. (100% assumed, for this sanity check calc)

    Those are sounding quite low, and if you seek to extract that level, clearly the 'spinning power' your setup requires, must be well under that.

    You can probably experimentally determine the 'spinning power' aka system losses, by coupling a tiny DC motor and plotting power vs each fixed/stable rpm operating point.
    That system loss power will set an upper limit, on the falling time you can hope to push to.


  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    jmg,
    The weight delivers a force, and force cannot deliver constant angular velocity. You can eventually get to some terminal velocity, when the system forces plus air-resistance equals your injected force, but at that point, you can extract no energy yourself.
    Yep. Force = mass times acceleration. According to Newton.

    So, acceleration = Force / mass

    Here we have a constant force due to gravity and a constant mass. Ergo, we have a constant acceleration. The thing runs faster and faster until limited by friction. Or something breaks! :)
    Adding stuff like escapements, waste a lot of energy.
    That is not clear to me. Traditionally escapements have been all about building clocks where keeping time and long running were important. That is to say, efficiency. Looking at a typical clock escapement only a tiny bit of energy is being wasted in the friction of the escapement.
    On the contrary, those are actually the ideal way to provide that balancing force needed to regulate the RPM.
    As the generator extract energy, it provides a reverse torque-by varying how much energy if extracts, you can vary that torque.
    Yep. The load on the generator can regulate this thing. A short circuit across a generator makes it harder to turn.

    Question is do you have a way to harness that energy? And regulate it?




  • so, lets do the math.
    10 pounds falling 5 feet is 50 foot pounds.
    divided by 86,400 (Seconds in a day) = 0.0005787037 foot pounds per second, or 0.00078462 watts.

    Unless you do this in a vacuum, you will lose all energy to air resistance at much less than 300 rpm, even if the wheel is perfectly smooth and polished.

    Of course, to top it off, the efficiency of a step up arrangement is poor, especially at this huuuuuge ratio. (if your windlass is 5' in circumference, thats a ratio of 1:432000!!)

    But, to answer the original question, with the windlass making one revolution, you need three stages of gearing at 1:60.plus one stage at 1:2
  • ercoerco Posts: 20,256
    This is either a joke or an Over-Unity spoof, right? I hate to be "that guy", but...

    A 24" diameter "ferris wheel" turning 5 revs/second is a fan, dissipating energy. It's its own governor at that speed, like a music box. No escapement required. You'll need to power it with an electric motor to move it that fast. A weight dropping 5 feet in 24 hours? Not even close enough to reality to be called futile.

    It goes without saying that you won't be generating any power off it.
  • Any energy extracted requires you to put it back in in the form of lifting the weight back up.

    So, what you will have accomplished is a very time-consuming, lossy way to do all of the work yourself anyway.
  • edited 2016-12-08 14:38
    The tide comes in and the tide goes out. Depending on where you are it can rise and lower a significant amount.

    Lots of energy there. Row boats and super tankers will rise and fall the same amount.
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2016-12-08 15:28
    To be fair, nobody said anything about free energy and over-unity clap trap.

    But yes, I think it would need a pretty big rock to get the job done as described.
  • kwinnkwinn Posts: 8,697
    Could always try it with a small stepper motor as the generator. A relatively small diameter shaft wound with the cable supporting the weight and a 24"wheel driving a small wheel on the stepper motor would provide a pretty good gear ratio, and a micro could control the load based on the frequency of the power from the stepper motor.
  • Tides is good- there is a huge amount of untapped energy in tidal activity.
Sign In or Register to comment.