Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
There's No Such Thing as an Electromagnetic Free Lunch — Parallax Forums

There's No Such Thing as an Electromagnetic Free Lunch

When a load is attached to the secondary coil of a transformer, the current that flows through that circuit comes from the primary via the inductive coupling between the coils. I've heard that if you put an amp meter on the primary you can measure the increased current draw in the primary as the load on the secondary increases.

What this means is that a wireless charger consumes more power when a phone is charging than when a phone is not.

Here's the weird thought.

A radio station broadcasts by moving electrons up and down an antenna to broadcast an electromagnetic wave. This seem a bit like a transformer with one turn. If I have a crystal radio its antenna is acting like the secondary coil in this one to one transformer. There is now a current flowing through the circuit and providing sound. Granted it is a few milliwatts, but it is not zero, and it had to come from somewhere, so obviously it came from the radio station (the primary).

Here's the weird questions.

Is this correct and could the additional load be measured? For example assume we turn on ten thousand crystal radios at once, that starts to add up!

tl;dr Does an unlisted radio station consume less power than a popular one?

Comments

  • Duane DegnDuane Degn Posts: 10,588
    edited 2016-11-25 16:07
    My guess is the radio signal's power is reduced once it passes through the crystal radio.

    I don't think turning on a bunch of crystal radios would increase the load at the transmitting station rather I think the extra radios would greatly reduce the distance the signal travels. I don't mean to imply the signal will reduce overall but any signal passing through a crystal radio's antenna would be greatly reduced in power so the extra receivers would act as a small barrier to the propagating signal.

    At least this the way I've made sense of it in my head.

    Hopefully someone with a better understanding of this stuff will chime in.

    Edit: I have very little confidence in my explanation. I'm starting to think Martin_H is likely correct in thinking popular radio stations would require more power than unpopular stations.
  • No, the radio load can't be measured. The transmitters puts out what it puts out and the radios just receive the little bit of that that comes their way. Think of it as a fountain and people with cups catching some. Even if ten thousand radios are turned on they are still only catching a minute fraction of the power being emitted.

    In the transformer it is magnetic flux that transfers the energy. In radio it is radio frequency waves.
  • Duane Degn wrote: »
    I'm starting to think Martin_H is likely correct in thinking popular radio stations would require more power than unpopular stations.



    Popular radio stations can afford bigger transmitters and antennas, better sound for the listener. Static free, able to be uninterrupted around tall buildings and under overpasses. But not to interfere with other stations in other cities on the same frequency. There is a lot of interferance to overcome, radio's everywhere.
  • Jonathan wrote: »
    In the transformer it is magnetic flux that transfers the energy. In radio it is radio frequency waves.

    OK, I think I understand this problem. Radio waves are electromagnetic waves which are detached from their source and radiating away, while the magnetic flux is part of the electromagnetic field around the coil.

    So the radio station spent all its energy when it sent the signal out, even if no one listens to it. But I think Duane has a point that an antenna blocks antennas behind it, much like one solar panel shades any behind it. Granted that with diffraction reduces the effect, but there's still no free lunch, some power is lost.
  • ercoerco Posts: 20,256
    Fun to ponder. I view the emitted radio energy much like light. It gets dimmer and dimmer as it travel farther from the source. But whether a given ray falls on and illuminates something, it knows not.

    But we've all been warned about living in close proximity to high tension power lines. I'm sure if you set up a long wire antenna under one of those it would act like a transformer secondary and you could draw a bit of power from the lines. Would probably be very hard to detect with all the other line losses. I look at the giant steel towers holding the lines up via insulators and wonder how much energy they may be absorbing. Are those towers grounded?

    WRT energy, other fun things to ponder are Free power radios, which rectify all the other signals you're NOT listening to, and use that energy to power an amplifier. Not much, but something. See #153 at http://www.crystalradio.net/crystalplans/

    See also http://www.ke3ij.com/nopower.htm
  • ercoerco Posts: 20,256
    Along the same lines as a self-powered radio mentioned above, here is a link to a schematic for a transmitter that uses no power supply other than your voice. Note it only transmits within a room with its 20 microwatt transmitter…
    http://www.intio.or.jp/jf10zl/PLTX.htm
  • erco wrote:
    I'm sure if you set up a long wire antenna under one of those it would act like a transformer secondary and you could draw a bit of power from the lines. Would probably be very hard to detect with all the other line losses.

    People have been caught and prosecuted for stealing power that way:

    http://www.industrytap.com/electromagnetic-harvesters-free-lunch-or-theft/1805

    -Phil
  • ercoerco Posts: 20,256
    Good article!

    Power company equipment detected the drain of energy and went to investigate. The farmer was arrested for using electricity from the power company without a meter.

    Last month, a guy was walking through our neighborhood pointing a very sci-fi "gun" at houses & power lines. The wife alerted me to him. Gamma rays? Shy young (?) me went out to welcome/confront the fellow. He was friendly enough and said he was with Frontier Communications (who just took over for Verizon in our 'hood) and was sniffing for a detected signal loss atop the newly-replaced phone poles behind our houses. Lot sizes here in God's Country are only ~50' wide by 100' deep, so we & our neighbors take an interest in who's sniffing what.

  • MikeDYurMikeDYur Posts: 2,176
    edited 2016-11-25 23:39
    erco wrote:
    I'm sure if you set up a long wire antenna under one of those it would act like a transformer secondary and you could draw a bit of power from the lines. Would probably be very hard to detect with all the other line losses.

    People have been caught and prosecuted for stealing power that way:

    http://www.industrytap.com/electromagnetic-harvesters-free-lunch-or-theft/1805

    -Phil



    I can understand the legal basis that is involved, if it is the farmers land, and the electric company leased or bought the property the towers stand on.

    But if HV overhanging wires cross your property between towers or run alongside, the electric company may use eminent domain to cross your land, and you are not compensated for that infraction. What is stopping you from trying to grab a few watts through the air.

    I don't think they can stop you from setting up a SW antenna, not that it could be used for that being in close proximity to what? 50, 000 Volts.


    EDIT: You can always wear some kind of electromagnetic clothing to harness some power. If it is going through your body anyway, maybe there is enough to keep your phone charged.
  • jonesjones Posts: 281
    edited 2016-11-26 02:34
    erco wrote:
    I'm sure if you set up a long wire antenna under one of those it would act like a transformer secondary and you could draw a bit of power from the lines. Would probably be very hard to detect with all the other line losses.

    People have been caught and prosecuted for stealing power that way:

    http://www.industrytap.com/electromagnetic-harvesters-free-lunch-or-theft/1805

    -Phil
    The second claim in that article, that someone was extracting power from a "radar beam" with an induction coil is complete nonsense. Ignoring issues of low average power and limited power density in the beam (especially as might be found in an inhabited structure), the winding capacitance of any lumped inductor will be a dead short to a pulse with the dV/dt of a radar signal. That's why radar uses waveguide. Cables are too lossy.

    If anyone thinks that claim is possible, would you please explain where my assumptions are wrong?

    While the first claim might be possible, I seriously doubt the practicality of it. Don't forget his barn would be in a mixed three-phase field, not at all like each phase being individually fed to transformer windings. I doubt that one could extract useful AC mains power from such a field with nothing but coils. You might get some power, but I would think you'd have to run a motor-generator set or something to get the usual single-phase power that houses run from.

    People HAVE tapped power illegally, but as far as I'm aware, it's done with direct connections (i.e. wire), not induction.

  • jonesjones Posts: 281
    edited 2016-11-26 03:17
    [deleted] Didn't see the OP's second post.
  • What brought this up is I have a day off, so I built a crystal radio out of parts from my junk drawer. It works and it got me thinking about exactly how it derived operating power from radio waves.

    In other news the radio works, but its selectivity isn't good as it seems to receive multiple channels at once. It was supposed to be tunable by moving a pickup up and down the coil, which should change the inductance to favor one channel. That kinda works.

    However, if you move your hands in various places near the coil your hand capacitance seems to partially favor one channel over another. So I imagine it might be improved if I added a variable capacitor, but my junk drawer is fresh out of them.
  • Martin_H wrote:
    However, if you move your hands in various places near the coil your hand capacitance seems to partially favor one channel over another. So I imagine it might be improved if I added a variable capacitor, but my junk drawer is fresh out of them.
    The obvious solution consists of various sizes of aluminum foil pieces placed at strategic locations along the antenna wire. Adding a pair of rabbit ears, which you can then rotate, can only augment the chaos solution. :)

    -Phil

  • jones wrote: »
    People HAVE tapped power illegally, but as far as I'm aware, it's done with direct connections (i.e. wire), not induction.

    I've had several physics instructors talk about people stealing power using induction coils. It might not be a common issue but I'm pretty sure it does happen.

  • jonesjones Posts: 281
    edited 2016-11-26 05:44
    Did they give you any hint how it was done? With three phases mixed together, it seems like it'd be more trouble than it's worth to try to get anything useful out of it.

    [edit] I've searched a bit, and can't find any examples of something practical. Lots of comments about how it should be possible, but those comments seem to conveniently ignore the fact that there are three phases.

    [edit 2] I did find this https://user.physics.unc.edu/~deardorf/phys25/rwp/exam1rwpsolution.html Even assuming a 230 kV single-phase line, it still wasn't even close to practical. I don't know that a physics exam question is much of an analysis, but it shows that it isn't as easy as it sounds. When the fields from three phases combine, I think the result is an even weaker field due to some cancellation.
  • ercoerco Posts: 20,256
    @Martin_H No one, NO ONE, dies happy without a well-used 365 pF variable capacitor in their junk drawer for crystal radio experiments. It doesn't HAVE to be air gap, but those are beautiful mechanical joys to behold.

    Close enough: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Variable-Capacitor-Dual-18-420-pF-18-135-pF-3-8-shaft-Ham-Radio-/252608094870
  • Duane DegnDuane Degn Posts: 10,588
    edited 2016-11-26 16:08
    jones wrote: »
    [edit 2] I did find this https://user.physics.unc.edu/~deardorf/phys25/rwp/exam1rwpsolution.html Even assuming a 230 kV single-phase line, it still wasn't even close to practical. I don't know that a physics exam question is much of an analysis, but it shows that it isn't as easy as it sounds. When the fields from three phases combine, I think the result is an even weaker field due to some cancellation.

    Those are great questions. They remind me of why I thought the magnetism and electricity semester of physics was so hard.

    Those questions sure make it seem like steeling power with a coil isn't very efficient.

    Thanks for taking the time to find the link.

  • Duane Degn wrote: »
    Those are great questions. They remind me of why I thought the magnetism and electricity semester of physics was so hard.

    Those questions sure make it seem like steeling power with a coil isn't very efficient.

    Thanks for taking the time to find the link.
    I think that part of physics was hard for most of us. I'd heard those stories and also assumed they were true. It wasn't until I read the article Phil linked that it occurred to me that the field would be the sum of the three phases, making it a lot harder to get anything useful out of it.

  • @Erco, I shall remedy both of those oversights posthaste. However I have a vernier dial, so I am not completely without hope.
  • ercoerco Posts: 20,256
    jones wrote: »
    I think that part of physics was hard for most of us.

    Just don't forget the right hand rule.

    Or was it the left hand rule?

  • kwinnkwinn Posts: 8,697
    erco wrote: »
    jones wrote: »
    I think that part of physics was hard for most of us.

    Just don't forget the right hand rule.

    Or was it the left hand rule?

    Or both.
  • erco wrote: »
    Just don't forget the right hand rule.

    Or was it the left hand rule?
    I haven't. Right hand is for beer, left hand is for pizza.

  • TorTor Posts: 2,010
    jones wrote: »
    People HAVE tapped power illegally, but as far as I'm aware, it's done with direct connections (i.e. wire), not induction.
    But I know a guy who actually did this. Induction, with a wire parallell to the (1-phase) 230V (at the time) line. The guy was a very poor (electronics) student at the time. Not sure how it would work today - the current 220V system is different w.r.t. earth and neutral.
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2016-11-28 11:23
    I once lived next to a dairy farm that had big power lines running over the middle of one field. The farmer found that the electric fence he ran under the lines was "live". Not much power to be had from that but enough volts to keep the cows from crossing it. No need to put batteries in the "ticker" box.
  • ercoerco Posts: 20,256
    All this highly-charged "shock talk" begs me to mention this party game I just ordered. "Lightning Reaction" actually shocks the loser of some built-in reaction games. Should be fun at Christmas parties. https://www.wish.com/m/c/5538620ed39b0c24fa0fabf6

  • Anybody seen a helicopter crew that maintains those HV power towers? Now that is a job for a special breed of people. I guess it fairly safe you once make the proper conections.

    Must be good money, I could think of better ways to enjoy a view.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 1,023
    edited 2016-11-29 14:41
    I made an "Operation" game that shocked you instead of lighting up the patients nose. Well, actually it did both. I used a flash from a disposable camera. It gave quite the jolt, very unsafe. But by golly, people played for REAL! :-0
    erco wrote: »
    All this highly-charged "shock talk" begs me to mention this party game I just ordered. "Lightning Reaction" actually shocks the loser of some built-in reaction games. Should be fun at Christmas parties.
Sign In or Register to comment.