Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
The Right To Fix — Parallax Forums

The Right To Fix

Came across this article while surfing the Net..

http://inthesetimes.com/article/18155/fight-for-the-right-to-fix-it

Your thoughts?

As a designer and a consumer, I really do not like any product that cannot be fixed at a reasonable cost to the owner.

When my son wanted a Macbook, I checked out its design...let's just say that I will not be buying one for myself.

http://www.macworld.com/article/2910314/apples-new-12-inch-macbook-closely-guards-its-secrets-with-screws-solder-and-glue.html
«1

Comments

  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2015-12-24 01:47
    Yep, this has been a growing trend for some years. You and I hate it. The majority of consumers don't seem to care. They are happy when their old iPhone breaks and they can then justify getting the latest shiny model.

    By the way, and I have asked this here before, what is it with young girls and broken iPhone screens?

    There is an iPhone repair shop in my office building and it seems to have an endless line of young girls coming in with their iPhones every day. The usual fault being a cracked screen.

    I have been watching this for years now, the girls far out number the the boys.

    One day a middle aged guy asked me for directions to that store. I mentioned it was odd to see a guy going there. He told me "Well, actually I have three daughters and I'm here on behalf of one of them"

    It's nuts.

  • Same as the auto industry, they have been trying to take the back yard mechanic out of the equation for decades.
  • potatoheadpotatohead Posts: 10,261
    edited 2015-12-24 08:02
    There should be a clear right to fix what you own. If that isn't on the table, then it's a rental, or license to use, not a physical thing you own.

    However, if the manufacturing techniques are not so easy to repair, the remedy should be the right to learn, not a mandated, easy fix product.

  • You mean, Heater, you didn't know that the iPhone warranty for its Gorilla designed glass screen supports only one fall? Or surviving one drop? (And that's without the damaged screen?)

    The simians who designed the special glass used on our smartphones and some other devices, rated it as perfect. For themselves, that is, but not for humans, young people and pets, but not including cats.
  • The headphone jack moving to Lightning is easier to repair.
  • kwinnkwinn Posts: 8,697
    @ Too_Many_Tools

    Totally in agreement with iFixit. We should be able to fix what we have purchased. At one time I was a big Apple supporter, but have become totally disgusted with the direction they have gone in. Worse than what IBM was doing in the mainframe market early on, and I suspect (and hope) Apple will suffer the same fate.

    @Heater

    I think the reason for so many girls having broken screens is that they store their cell phones in their back pockets. Every one of my teenaged nieces and their friends do so, as do a lot of the older ones. Very easy to forget it's there when sitting down.
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    That's the thing. I was wondering if more girls sit on their phones more than boys. Or do boys not use Apple so much?

    My guess is that other manufactures are going the Apple way. It's far simpler and quicker just to glue everything together than to design a thing to be dismantleable and mess around with with making batteries removable and so on.

    MS has certainly gone that way with it's Surface machines.

    Gone are the days of inheriting your grandmothers sewing machine that still worked and could be serviced if it broke.
  • Heater. wrote: »
    Gone are the days of inheriting your grandmothers sewing machine that still worked and could be serviced if it broke.

    Oh contraire. :) I have two Singer sewing machines that I still get parts for.
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2015-12-24 17:30
    Amazing. Sadly my grandmothers Singer is long gone. No idea what happened to it.

    It was one like this:

    treadle+frontWEB.jpg
  • kwinnkwinn Posts: 8,697
    @ Heater

    Boy that brings back some memories. I came across a cast iron base like the one in the picture you posted. It was quite rusty and had no table, but the price was right ($2.00) so I bought it. Had it sandblasted, sprayed it with clear varathane as a rust inhibitor, and made a nice oak top. Made a great sewing table and hobby bench.
  • The old guys told me the difference between profession and consumer equipment is where it can be repaired.

    Often I will pay a little more to get something the can be repaired, or pay a little less for something I can enjoy smashing to peices and re-purpose for my own devious ends.

    All the Apple and Android stuff I have, I got for free, because thats all its worth. Same with my car, its a loaded luxury model of the midrange generic sedan, I just waited until I found a slightly used one that cost less than the cheapest new car. Makes a real statement, "I don't care about anything aside for getting from A to B reliably."

    Not everyone wears the "I void warranties" t-shirt, but some of us try to walk that walk. If I own it, I'm going to break it, try to fix it, and try to break it again. Keeps punks like me off the streets.
  • Heater. wrote: »
    Amazing. Sadly my grandmothers Singer is long gone. No idea what happened to it.

    It was one like this:

    treadle+frontWEB.jpg
    I have the same base, but alas the machine was missing when i bought it.
  • Apple doesn't seal their products closed just to be sneaky. They have offered products that are easy to open and repair, along side of similar products that are slimmer but sealed. The people voted with their dollars - they wanted the non-repairable product. This was pointed out about Packard-Bell many years back. People hated that they soldered in the CPUs, but they pointed out that less than 2% of their customers had any desire to upgrade the CPU (or was the 2% the number of Packard-Bell computers that actually worked?). So the MacBook isn't easy to open. Most people never open their laptop, and they couldn't fix it anyway. Those that do tinker with Propellers and Pi's.

    It would be nice if all companies made a line of products designed to be opened up and tinkered with. Until then, we have Parallax. :smile:
  • kwinnkwinn Posts: 8,697
    Marka32 wrote: »
    Apple doesn't seal their products closed just to be sneaky. They have offered products that are easy to open and repair, along side of similar products that are slimmer but sealed. The people voted with their dollars - they wanted the non-repairable product. This was pointed out about Packard-Bell many years back. People hated that they soldered in the CPUs, but they pointed out that less than 2% of their customers had any desire to upgrade the CPU (or was the 2% the number of Packard-Bell computers that actually worked?). So the MacBook isn't easy to open. Most people never open their laptop, and they couldn't fix it anyway. Those that do tinker with Propellers and Pi's.

    It would be nice if all companies made a line of products designed to be opened up and tinkered with. Until then, we have Parallax. :smile:

    Good point, but it would be nice if they didn't actively go out of their way to make repairing products difficult.
  • potatoheadpotatohead Posts: 10,261
    edited 2015-12-31 04:53
    Apple wants the design advantages associated with advanced manufacturing processes. Repair isn't a consideration. Long life, high pwrfoemance, design value, etc are.

    They don't make any money shipping air. Yes, that is a design rule check. How much less air is in the new product?

    Their value proposition is centered on specific things not aligned with service. Often, it's cheaper to replace rather than service too. That's a perfectly valid business model.

    Many people, who buy their products value the use and design value and their time high enough to ignore repair. So long as that is true, Apple is just fine. Other choices exist and those tradeoffs play out in the market accordingly.
  • kwinnkwinn Posts: 8,697
    potatohead wrote: »
    Apple wants the design advantages associates with advanced manufacturing processes.

    They don't make any money shipping air. Yes, that is a design rule check. How much less air is in the new product?

    That's good, since it means slimmer laptops. Still, we should be able to open them to replace defective parts and have access to those parts.
  • potatoheadpotatohead Posts: 10,261
    edited 2015-12-31 05:39
    No. That's value Apple doesn't consider worth it.

    They make stuff. Truth is, you are completely free to open it up and do what you want. I did, and it was tough, but possible.

    I wrote this above. They make them how they make them, and we choose. If we choose Apple, then we don't care to open it, or we plan on upping our game to open it in a productive way.

    You can open it, and you can get parts. It is just hard. Given how Apple competes, making it easier adds no real value. No joke.

    Others make it easier, and they compete differently than Apple does.

    Your choice from there. You just don't have to pick Apple.

    But, if you want the thinnest sexy lsptop, those are the terms. It is even more expensive to make it thin, sexy and easy to repair.

    Comes down to just what is worth what.

    For Apple, it comes down to value they can charge for. They have learned people won't pay more for an easy to repair device, but they will pay more for a thin, sexy, high performance one.

    Apple can also say we have a right to learn too. Get after it, up your game,.or get an easier to tear into product. Not sure that is entirely fair, but that is how it is.
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    Spud,
    Apple wants the design advantages associated with advanced manufacturing processes. Repair isn't a consideration. Long life, high pwrfoemance, design value, etc are.
    Yes, all the advantages of cheaper manufacture and higher profit margins.

    I was was absentmindedly watching a tear down of a fake iPhone on Youtube the other day. A really cheap knock off apparently. I started to think it was better than the real thing. Same size shape etc, easier to open, easier to replace the battery, a removable SIM card. Much, much cheaper!

    Paradoxically, despite the apparent unrepairabilty of Apple products there must be half a dozen Apple service shops in this town of less than one million people. Seems more Apple products are getting repaired than any other. At least the one I walk past everyday has an endless stream of customers. Mostly young girls who have cracked their iPhone screens it seems. It's like the old days when the was a clock maker on every main street fixing clocks and watches.

    Hmm...I have to pop in there and ask them what they do actually fix most of the time.


  • kwinnkwinn Posts: 8,697
    @spud >> re: You just don't have to pick Apple.

    No problem with that, I don't!
  • kwinn wrote: »
    @spud >> re: You just don't have to pick Apple.

    No problem with that, I don't!
    Are Android phones any easier to repair? Or do you just not use a cell phone.

  • David Betz wrote: »
    kwinn wrote: »
    @spud >> re: You just don't have to pick Apple.

    No problem with that, I don't!
    Are Android phones any easier to repair? Or do you just not use a cell phone.

    Most of them are fairly easy, even the ones with the back glued on like my previous Xperia Zs. My wife even replaced the touchscreen on her Xperia herself! But now that I have a Nexus 6P I'm trying not to break anymore phones.

    I went to fix up a friend's late 2012 Macbook and found that the SSD had completely failed and an early 2012 model SSD does not fit but are easy to get. Apparently rather than slowly die and make the Mac look back they just refuse to work so that you have to spend $$$ and hope it doesn't fail too soon again. There's not too much you can repair in units themselves, the boards and parts are covered in a black conformal coating etc.

    I have my theory about SSDs that they are a massive marketing fraud, people buy them because they have "faster boot times" :) but once the unit has booted so what? Gimme lotsa ram I say. All these SSDs seem to prematurely fail but considering that many OS'es and filesystems are not really designed for Flash memory is it any wonder that sectors that get constantly erased end up in device failure? I've seen this happen even with my first "SSD" PC, the EEEPC. Once FRAM or PCM or MRAM or RRAM some other technology becomes mainstream the SSD will be looked upon with great derision.

  • kwinnkwinn Posts: 8,697
    David Betz wrote: »
    kwinn wrote: »
    @spud >> re: You just don't have to pick Apple.

    No problem with that, I don't!
    Are Android phones any easier to repair? Or do you just not use a cell phone.
    Yes, I use a cell phone, and it is far easier to replace the battery, sim card, and micro sd card than on the apple phones I have encountered. Same is generally true of the laptops.
  • kwinn wrote: »
    David Betz wrote: »
    kwinn wrote: »
    @spud >> re: You just don't have to pick Apple.

    No problem with that, I don't!
    Are Android phones any easier to repair? Or do you just not use a cell phone.
    Yes, I use a cell phone, and it is far easier to replace the battery, sim card, and micro sd card than on the apple phones I have encountered. Same is generally true of the laptops.
    That's good to know. As it turns out, I've never had to replace anything in one of my iPhones, even the original iPhone 1. However, I'm probably not a very heavy user of phones so my experience may not be typical. I mostly use the Mac because I like the fact that it is BSD Unix underneath. I spend a fair amount of time at the command prompt when I'm programming and the Windows command prompt is nowhere near as nice as the Mac. Of course, Linux is good as well. I may switch to that if Apple gets too difficult to deal with but that hasn't happened so far. Also, I'm sort of locked into the Apple ecosystem. When I tried using an Android phone a while back, I found that it didn't play that well with my Mac. Maybe it's better with Windows or Linux. Anyway, Unix is the reason I'm on the Mac. I only switched back to the Mac from Windows when OS X came out.

  • David Betz wrote: »
    Also, I'm sort of locked into the Apple ecosystem. When I tried using an Android phone a while back, I found that it didn't play that well with my Mac. Maybe it's better with Windows or Linux. Anyway, Unix is the reason I'm on the Mac. I only switched back to the Mac from Windows when OS X came out.

    Welcome to "that" hotel in California :) For sure you can checkout any time. That song came out a year after Apple was started. Maybe they knew something even back then :)
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    Right to Fix. Bah! I want the right to break it.

    Mark my words. Soon it will be illegal to break all these devices on our person and in our homes and cars that track and spy on us.
  • David Betz wrote: »
    Also, I'm sort of locked into the Apple ecosystem. When I tried using an Android phone a while back, I found that it didn't play that well with my Mac. Maybe it's better with Windows or Linux. Anyway, Unix is the reason I'm on the Mac. I only switched back to the Mac from Windows when OS X came out.

    Welcome to "that" hotel in California :) For sure you can checkout any time. That song came out a year after Apple was started. Maybe they knew something even back then :)
    So far I don't have any reason to check out. However, I hate almost all of the Apple apps, especially iTunes, so I may go looking for new music software and that may pry me away from the Apple world. As I mentioned, I would likely go to Linux if I decide to jump ship from Apple.

  • I use a Mac regularly for similar reasons. But I do not use the Apple ecosystem.

    That said, it's all a nice package. Plenty of people are happy to pay for that.

    Never did use music software. I have a big music folder, and it's in there. I point a program at it, or copy bits of it, or the whole thing to a phone and go.

    The Droid music app is happy to find album art, make playlists, etc...

    Never needed more than that.
  • Back to sewing machines. My grandmother had one like the one pictured. She bought flour in printed cloth bags. These bags ended up as shirts for me.

    John Abshier
  • potatoheadpotatohead Posts: 10,261
    edited 2015-12-31 15:32
    Cool. My Mom had a similar machine. I learned how to use it and made some (crappy) clothing. Sewing, knitting and the art of clothing is a high value basic skill.

    Re: right to break

    Yes, agreed. I do not see a requirement for that to be easy making any real sense. IMHO, the right balance is to ensure the right to hack, and more generally learn.

    This is where things go wrong, like John Deere locking down all software on the farming equipment. Farmers have traditionally been hackers, making whatever they have get the crops in.

    Deere locks stuff down, and they have their reasons, but the farmers have their circumventing reasons too.

    If we don't enable both, artificial value happens, and that means paying money for essentially nothing meaningful.

    If we do enable both, then we get infringement, piracy, etc...

    There is no perfect solution, just ugly tradeoffs. I much prefer the right to hack tradeoffs myself.
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    John,

    The modern day "Maker" movement is no doubt a wonderful thing. But I get a bit queasy thinking about it. Seems like only yesterday that pretty much everybody was a "maker". Mothers were running up clothing and curtains and such on their sewing machines. Fathers were making furniture, fixing the house and car. And lots more beside.

    Somehow we entered a period of fifty years or so where people stopped making anything and forgot how to.

    The Maker movement may go some way towards rectifying that situation.




Sign In or Register to comment.