lack of numbering of thread entries.
LoopyByteloose
Posts: 12,537
I really do think we don't need hysterical negativity about the change, but this item is something that I think needs to be reinstated ASAP. So I am not going to be blithe about this necessary feature being removed.
Some of our threads are very long. And historically, we have all referenced an entry that is not directly above by the sequence number of the entry.
Removing that feature now breaks up a lot of references into useless material.
Some of our threads are very long. And historically, we have all referenced an entry that is not directly above by the sequence number of the entry.
Removing that feature now breaks up a lot of references into useless material.
Comments
As for simple references, like "see the code i posted in #12", you may just need to re-word to "see my code in this post". Not as convenient for the author, but at least there's a workaround, and it has the added benefit of being more convenient for the reader.
Why bother with preserving old postings in the changeover if they are going to collapse into non-use?
Being able to link to earlier posts is useful but I think we also need the posts to be numbered.
technical forum with some pretty long threads they will have to come up with a method for a person on a phone to
traverse these kind of threads. FYI I liked the forum before the last one we used to have.
@Ken I have advocated for the use of new devices but there are problems using it in it's current state. I hope you can
chime in as to what things and when these things might happen?
John Abshier
This is not an ego thing. It just makes finding what you want harder.
If it is at all possible, it will look odd when the display is sorted by Votes. But that is odd anyway.
I can't remember which Forum I like best. I just dread all Forum change overs. Sad to say, but one individual has seemed actually gleeful about all the glitches - he/she who shall never be named.
Making matters worse, their documentation for writing and altering themes is below paltry. Here's a typical example:
http://docs.vanillaforums.com/theming/css/
As in, there is no example, because the documentation is empty.