Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
What if we place an reflective object on the moon? — Parallax Forums

What if we place an reflective object on the moon?

CuriousOneCuriousOne Posts: 931
edited 2014-12-08 21:24 in General Discussion
Inspired by recent news that UK scientists plan to bore a 100 meter deep shaft in moon...

As we know, actual moon surface is quite dark, reflects only small amount of sunlight. So what if some lunar mission will bring some, say, stainless steel foil sheet, and place It on the moon? what size of that foil should be, so we can see the reflected light with bare eye?

Comments

  • Dr_AculaDr_Acula Posts: 5,484
    edited 2014-12-08 01:03
  • CuriousOneCuriousOne Posts: 931
    edited 2014-12-08 05:35
    Yes, but simpler, larger, cheaper :)
  • GadgetmanGadgetman Posts: 2,436
    edited 2014-12-08 06:18
    If it's made 'simpler' it definitely won't be cheaper.

    That laser reflector is the most efficient means to reflect light without having 'active' aiming of the mirror.
  • Beau SchwabeBeau Schwabe Posts: 6,566
    edited 2014-12-08 07:27
  • LoopyBytelooseLoopyByteloose Posts: 12,537
    edited 2014-12-08 07:38
    Maybe the OP is pondering redirection of sunlight via the moon to earth for 24/7 solar power?

    It may have some merits of scale over redirection via artificial satellite in a lower Earth orbit. But dust might be a problem... maybe a satellite in lunar orbit would be cleaner. One still has the problem of occasional eclipses.
  • Mark_TMark_T Posts: 1,981
    edited 2014-12-08 09:00
    If you want it to be seen by eye then you need a white sheet, not a metal mirror, otherwise
    the chance of correct alignment for a reflection is negligible - it'll just reflect the night sky
    and be darker than the moon's surface!

    If you were to choose a metal then steel is too heavy for space - aluminized mylar foil
    would be more plausible.

    And you want it facing us, not on the lunar south pole like the borehole mission.

    A retro-reflector is very inefficient for being visible, its what's needed for range-finding
    since you have to send and receive a laser pulse. For visibility you use sunlight, since
    its plentiful and cheap.

    The kind of features visible to the naked eye on the moon are 100's km, although
    the albedo is low even for the "white" rays coming out of younger impact craters.
    Perhaps something like a 20km white disc would be visible.
  • CuriousOneCuriousOne Posts: 931
    edited 2014-12-08 12:15
    Mylar foil going to melt :)

    20km, sure?

    If object is much brighter than surroundings, still need to be that big?
  • NWCCTVNWCCTV Posts: 3,629
    edited 2014-12-08 14:31
    Why bother? From the sounds of it, the Chinese will soon own the moon and will be mining the Helium 3 that it contains. We all will then be bowing to the Chinese to fuel our future.
  • msrobotsmsrobots Posts: 3,709
    edited 2014-12-08 15:56
    Yeah, first thing they will do is to paint the moon red.

    But we can still beat them then by writing Coca Cola on it...

    Enjoy!

    Mike
  • NWCCTVNWCCTV Posts: 3,629
    edited 2014-12-08 16:15
    I think Budweiser would be better, since it's cans are red, white and blue.
  • RDL2004RDL2004 Posts: 2,554
    edited 2014-12-08 20:22
    Advertising on the Moon... Reminds me of the old story by Robert A. Heinlein "The Man Who Sold the Moon".

    The original question "what size of that foil should be, so we can see the reflected light with bare eye?" did get me to Googling for a while. I would guess the answer is probably somewhere between 10 and 100 km, but that's just a very rough estimate.

    Mylar type material has been used for decades as part of the insulation on spacecraft. The Lunar Module was wrapped in layers of it. I don't think it will melt on the Moon :)






    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_Who_Sold_the_Moon
  • Buck RogersBuck Rogers Posts: 2,185
    edited 2014-12-08 20:37
    RDL2004 wrote: »
    Advertising on the Moon... Reminds me of the old story by Robert A. Heinlein "The Man Who Sold the Moon".

    The original question "what size of that foil should be, so we can see the reflected light with bare eye?" did get me to Googling for a while. I would guess the answer is probably somewhere between 10 and 100 km, but that's just a very rough estimate.

    Mylar type material has been used for decades as part of the insulation on spacecraft. The Lunar Module was wrapped in layers of it. I don't think it will melt on the Moon :)






    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_Who_Sold_the_Moon

    Hello!
    It was indeed. It was one of several DuPont materials that were created for the space age.

    As for reflective objects up there, the Apollo Experiment packages that were parked up there by the astronauts which are still there, and unless the solar wind has degraded them, should still work.

    Side point, note the name involved with the moon and most of his lunar stories after Rocketship Galileo and a number of others. Hint, the family is still with us, and he was the governor either before or after FDR, I do know he was all over Europe and passed away fairly recently.

    Oh and oddly enough an individual with my IRL name (last name) was involved with the whole business, eventually he retired from that business and ran a building materials shop near where I grew up.
  • CuriousOneCuriousOne Posts: 931
    edited 2014-12-08 21:24
    There was interview on NPR with a businessman (forgot his name), who bought the defunct "lunokhod" which is stuck on moon. He was asked, why would you buy that, chances that you get there and get use of it are minimal? he answered - "I understand all that, but don't forget, now I'm the only one person who can legally say, that he owns private property on the moon" :D

    For the night time illumination, as I have read, russians had some prototype satellites flying on low orbit, but costs were considered too much, compared to benefits it offered.
Sign In or Register to comment.