nuclear fusion
Pliers
Posts: 280
I used to get excited about this.
Lockheed announces breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/williampentland/2014/10/15/lockheed-martin-claims-fusion-breakthrough-that-could-change-world-forever/
Lockheed announces breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/williampentland/2014/10/15/lockheed-martin-claims-fusion-breakthrough-that-could-change-world-forever/
Comments
I certainly wish them well but I'm not sure I'd be willing to put much of my money in it if were a Kickstarter. That gives me an idea. . .
I think a game changer like this would be a fabulous jolt to society/politics.
The problem with articles like this one from Forbes is that they give scant information, and don't point to authoritative sources for followup. Their article is actually a news piece about the reporting by another news agency (Reuters). Tacky. Like they couldn't have called the PR guy at Lockheed for their own quotes? What's more, the Lockheed announcement is from a year and a half ago. What's happened that it's in the news again?
At any rate, the Reuters article doesn't provide much more insight on why Lockheed's magnetic containment is any better than the many other similar reactors around the globe.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/10/16/experts_skeptical_over_lockheed_martins_claims_to_have_cracked_fusion/
-Tor
Also, the regular updates of Rossi's ECat of course. And even the Z-Machine team made a claim of energy generation progress, even though they're supposedly meant to be researching weapons.
I figured out why now too. As mentioned in that link, there is an annual Fusion Energy Conference this Friday - today for me. Drumming up topics to chin-wag about.
Erlend
Anyway, thanks for that link. Has some good additional info.