Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Beyond Lego, beyond 3D House printing — Parallax Forums

Beyond Lego, beyond 3D House printing

LoopyBytelooseLoopyByteloose Posts: 12,537
edited 2014-03-27 07:00 in General Discussion
A new issue of Engineering News Report arrived today (dated March 10, 2014) with Robot Workers on the cover.

I had my doubts about this as the Operating Engineers and Laborer unions really might shun such changes. Most of the article covered robots that are 'not quite ready for prime time'. But the one that really makes sense is a SAM (Semi-Autonomous Mason).

Apparently this is a product from a small company in Rochester, N.Y. called Constrution Robotics. It seems so obvious, but SAM does weight 1,500 lbs.

And on page 42 of the issue is a ranking of probablity of various contruction jobs being automated by robots. Operating engineers is highest at 0.95, with conrete finishers ranked 0.94. Roofers come in a .90. So a robot that can lay down shingles might be another. Brick masons are at 0.82. And lots more.

The main point is that there is a lot of material here that targets individual tasks rather than the rather naive idea that a whole house can be 3D printed.

Comments

  • xanaduxanadu Posts: 3,347
    edited 2014-03-26 02:31
    Page 42... That was inevitable. Tasking a robot with impressing humans, not so much. If I had a house built by robots what goals would I have left? Seriously, where do you go from there?
  • LoopyBytelooseLoopyByteloose Posts: 12,537
    edited 2014-03-26 07:59
    Where do I (we, or you) go from here?

    It is a very real question. Engineering New Record is a McGraw-Hill publication that generally reflects the views of the top end of the construction industry is the USA.

    If people can't create economic value out of a skill set or and educational credential, what are realistic future careers?

    I found the concept of a Semi-Automatic Mason both exciting and worrisome. It claims that it will retain the jobs for masons, but triple the daily output with equal quality.

    Everyone needs an occupation that allows them to prosper. I really have no idea what the future holds.
  • mindrobotsmindrobots Posts: 6,506
    edited 2014-03-26 09:43
    Where do I (we, or you) go from here?

    Everyone needs an occupation that allows them to prosper. I really have no idea what the future holds.

    Sadly, this may be more truth than fiction:
  • WBA ConsultingWBA Consulting Posts: 2,934
    edited 2014-03-26 09:59
    Interesting robot concept. Not sure how much it could be considered "efficeint" though. After watching this video for example, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD-3aj3cD1s , the robot is performing the lowest skill step in regards to masonry which is the actual slop set of the brick. Bricklaying is an art that requires human finesse. You can see the person in the background doing the final set, nudge, trowel, clean, etc. Plus, I have seen masons do all of that in the time that the robot only lays the brick. Granted, the robot will not tire, but does require support crew, is very bulky, cannot lay brick in confined spaces, etc. There may be some value in a brick laying robot, but looks like there is still work to be done to have them accepted. I do agree that it would keep jobs for masons, because the fine work is not being done by the robot. It would allow masons to work at peak performance longer since lifting/setting the bricks is the bulk of the labor.
  • LoopyBytelooseLoopyByteloose Posts: 12,537
    edited 2014-03-27 07:00
    After viewing the YouTube video and a good night's sleep, it seems to me that there is ample room for improvement over the machine shown.

    It is an interesting machine, but doesn't really take into account that feeding bricks from a pallet and mortar from a scaled down concrete pump might substantially streamline the process.

    I also can't help but think that the scaffolding and alignment systems are geared mostly toward providing masons with work along side the machine. That may be a wise move politically to get the machines accepted on the job site. But in the long run, I suspect the human element will be pushed out.

    So there is plenty of room for mechanical engineers to make this work better. And lots of opportunity for alternative patents.
Sign In or Register to comment.