Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Win 7? - Page 2 — Parallax Forums

Win 7?

2»

Comments

  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2014-01-11 12:01
    xanadu,

    OK, here we go:
    $ xwininfo -root
    ...
    ...
      Width: 1280
      Height: 1024
      Depth: 24
    ...
    ...
    
    Or:
    $ xrandr
    Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1280 x 1024, maximum 4096 x 4096
    
    That's an out of the box Debian install. I haven't fetched the NVIDIA drivers yet.
  • xanaduxanadu Posts: 3,347
    edited 2014-01-11 12:16
    AMD Athlon 4000+ with some old NVIDIA graphics on the mother board was a very common combination for me on Etch. Maybe I should revisit the situation on Wheezy.

    I'm going to have to figure something out to replace Windows XP on a ton of Fujitsu B Series laptops. I've got a one here now and I'm downloading Wheezy.
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2014-01-11 12:24
    xanadu,

    Don't expect miracles from that on board graphics on the AMD 4000+ mother boards. I only installed the NVIDIA drivers so that I could get some webgl stuff working. It works but it's not so fast.
  • xanaduxanadu Posts: 3,347
    edited 2014-01-11 12:28
    Copy that, luckily the software (running on remote desktop server) is so slow nobody would notice poor VGA performance, just resolution.
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2014-01-11 13:16
    And guess what?

    Having said all that I installed the NVIDIA drivers to this old AMD 64. Had to rebuild after a hard drive failure. Now my accelerated webgl works under Firefox but not Chrome like it did before....grrrr
  • RDL2004RDL2004 Posts: 2,554
    edited 2014-01-11 14:25
    Ah, the joys of Linux...

    Seriously, Windows is not much better.
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2014-01-11 14:54
    No worries. Just had to enable webgl in [URL]chrome://flags/[/URL]. Hardly a Linux issue.

    I have no idea if Windows is better or not. I only have to keep it running for a few friends. I can't actually do anything with it.
  • Martin_HMartin_H Posts: 4,051
    edited 2014-01-11 17:18
    Yeah I'm the Windows guru for most people I know. I imagine that you are correct that Linux is better now, but at the moment I don't have a need to try it. I can't remember why I went with Ubuntu over Debian, but I think at the time the Debian install was really rough asking me to set up all kinds of partitions while Ubuntu recommended a scheme so I went with that.
  • Clock LoopClock Loop Posts: 2,069
    edited 2014-01-11 17:42
    Keeping windows xp past its "date" isn't all that big of a deal. Just download offline updaters like WSUS so you can reinstall xp and the updates if you have problems. Part of the reason to upgrade the os is security, but if you are still using xp TODAY, you have gone well past expiration of any securities you thought you had. Of all the reasons, using a newer os for better security, would be at the top.

    Whats funny, is why isn't a much stronger encryption used? The reason we didn't do this in the past was cpu time it took to encrypt, but today, a single second blip of modern cpu power and we can generate encryption on levels that its even hard for super computers to work with. But yet the browsers and webservers don't push that direction.....
  • ratronicratronic Posts: 1,451
    edited 2014-01-11 17:43
    I just found out about a month ago that Win7 Desktop gadgets had to be disabled for security reasons. Now they have been gone I don't miss them. I used to have an old IBM ThinkPad and one time swapped out XP for Win7 and it ran a lot faster w/ Win7.
  • xanaduxanadu Posts: 3,347
    edited 2014-01-11 20:43
    Clock Loop wrote: »
    Keeping windows xp past its "date" isn't all that big of a deal. Just download offline updaters like WSUS so you can reinstall xp and the updates if you have problems. Part of the reason to upgrade the os is security, but if you are still using xp TODAY, you have gone well past expiration of any securities you thought you had. Of all the reasons, using a newer os for better security, would be at the top.

    Whats funny, is why isn't a much stronger encryption used? The reason we didn't do this in the past was cpu time it took to encrypt, but today, a single second blip of modern cpu power and we can generate encryption on levels that its even hard for super computers to work with. But yet the browsers and webservers don't push that direction.....

    I can't keep XP on machines because our vendors are telling us they will no longer support it. I don't use support often for workstations but they'll do anything to get out of doing their job, so unfortunately no more XP. Last time I heard that Vista workstations were corrupting a CTree database... They don't support Windows 8 or Server 2012 R2 either. I need to start figuring out a list of stuff I don't support.

    Yeah it's nice CPU isn't much of a factor for encryption. I build routers for my company using Soekris Engineering boxes and embedded FreeBSD running m0n0wall. Those little cheesy CPUs can handle a bunch of triple DES IPSEC tunnels no problem at all.
  • Dr_AculaDr_Acula Posts: 5,484
    edited 2014-01-12 02:57
    Our whole work network is XP (medical practice). As a nerdy 'early adopter', a few weeks back I'd get a newer operating system so I got a machine with Win 8.1. Very nice, boots in about 10s instead of XP's 6 minutes, so it is now almost as fast to boot as CP/M was in the early 1980s. But... the IT guy said 8.1 would not work with all the medical software, so he took 8.1 off and installed Win 7. I got the feeling Win7 is the solid operating system that the IT crowd like (and the IT support guy thinks it is not strange at all to still be running XP).
    I'm using 8.1 at home and I am happy with it, but it has taken computing back to the steep part of the learning curve for a while. It is nice though that whatever you plug into a USB drive works straight away as XP was getting a bit difficult there.
    The only real criticism with Win 8.1 is that it looks like it is meant for a touchscreen, which means my kids keep leaving greasy fingerprints all over my venerable CRT monitor :)

    erco said "But from what I hear, some [ebay win7] copies/keys aren't legit."

    Yep, been there and been stung. Paypal, to their great credit, actually sent me a refund!
  • Ron CzapalaRon Czapala Posts: 2,418
    edited 2014-01-12 08:23
    Clock Loop wrote: »
    Keeping windows xp past its "date" isn't all that big of a deal. Just download offline updaters like WSUS so you can reinstall xp and the updates if you have problems. ...

    I have manually downloaded all of the XP updates relevant to my PC using the Administrator option on the MS update site.
    It stands at 988 files (7.44GB). Trying to apply them in the right order could be tricky though :smile:
  • xanaduxanadu Posts: 3,347
    edited 2014-01-12 13:24
    Dr_Acula wrote: »
    Our whole work network is XP (medical practice). As a nerdy 'early adopter', a few weeks back I'd get a newer operating system so I got a machine with Win 8.1. Very nice, boots in about 10s instead of XP's 6 minutes, so it is now almost as fast to boot as CP/M was in the early 1980s. But... the IT guy said 8.1 would not work with all the medical software, so he took 8.1 off and installed Win 7. I got the feeling Win7 is the solid operating system that the IT crowd like (and the IT support guy thinks it is not strange at all to still be running XP).
    I'm using 8.1 at home and I am happy with it, but it has taken computing back to the steep part of the learning curve for a while. It is nice though that whatever you plug into a USB drive works straight away as XP was getting a bit difficult there.
    The only real criticism with Win 8.1 is that it looks like it is meant for a touchscreen, which means my kids keep leaving greasy fingerprints all over my venerable CRT monitor :)

    erco said "But from what I hear, some [ebay win7] copies/keys aren't legit."

    Yep, been there and been stung. Paypal, to their great credit, actually sent me a refund!

    Mind if I ask what EMR software you're using? I kinda poll everyone I know...

    We deal with mostly McKesson and eClinicalWorks, some new sites have MD Suite.
  • Dr_AculaDr_Acula Posts: 5,484
    edited 2014-01-12 14:15
    @xanadu, this is our EMR software http://www.bpsoftware.com.au
  • xanaduxanadu Posts: 3,347
    edited 2014-01-12 18:01
    Thanks Doc.
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    edited 2014-01-12 18:23
    Dr_Acula wrote: »
    Our whole work network is XP (medical practice). As a nerdy 'early adopter', a few weeks back I'd get a newer operating system so I got a machine with Win 8.1. Very nice, boots in about 10s instead of XP's 6 minutes, so it is now almost as fast to boot as CP/M was in the early 1980s. But... the IT guy said 8.1 would not work with all the medical software, so he took 8.1 off and installed Win 7. I got the feeling Win7 is the solid operating system that the IT crowd like (and the IT support guy thinks it is not strange at all to still be running XP).
    I'm using 8.1 at home and I am happy with it, but it has taken computing back to the steep part of the learning curve for a while. It is nice though that whatever you plug into a USB drive works straight away as XP was getting a bit difficult there.
    The only real criticism with Win 8.1 is that it looks like it is meant for a touchscreen, which means my kids keep leaving greasy fingerprints all over my venerable CRT monitor :)

    erco said "But from what I hear, some [ebay win7] copies/keys aren't legit."

    Yep, been there and been stung. Paypal, to their great credit, actually sent me a refund!
    At least it's better than whiteout on your screen after a trip to Ireland ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.