inductor: to combat noise & spikes on power supply line
resistor: fight against external ground bounce
Except that the inductor acts as anti-decoupling (perhaps a cap was missing from the schematic).
The resistor might be used for allowing chip current consumption to be measured.
I've a great little book called "Digital Hardware Design" by Catt/Walton/Davidson from the 70's
endevouring to explain transmission line theory physics to electronics engineers - in it they convincing
explain that much early TTL circuits only worked because of TTL's self-decoupling behaviour(*). You
have to remember that a lot of early digital hardware was designed by RF engineers who only ever
experienced the harmonic oscillator and resonant systems, not the heaviside step.
(*) current switching transients are absorbed by nearby static loads in bias circuitry, reducing the
severity of voltage transients on the supply. CMOS has no such robustness.
"inductor: to combat noise & spikes on power supply line ... ...resistor: fight against external ground bounce"
... I think it's the other way around in this case TTL is a great source of noise of itself. If the supply line is shared with any analog circuitry or other noisy TTL's then the inductor will help to Decouple that noise. The resistor might take a little bit of the edge off of the noise generated from the TTL as well by lowering the "Q" factor of any harmonic oscillations that could occur. Remember, even though there aren't any physical capacitors there are parasitic capacitors that are formed within the IC mostly snubbed by a back to back parasitic diode effect within the TTL but still present.
Indeed, I'd assumed only digital circuitry as this was in the context of computers but indeed there
might be analog peripherals nearby. Nice animation of the development of decoupling through
the ages on that site, BTW
Comments
resistor: fight against external ground bounce
Except that the inductor acts as anti-decoupling (perhaps a cap was missing from the schematic).
The resistor might be used for allowing chip current consumption to be measured.
I've a great little book called "Digital Hardware Design" by Catt/Walton/Davidson from the 70's
endevouring to explain transmission line theory physics to electronics engineers - in it they convincing
explain that much early TTL circuits only worked because of TTL's self-decoupling behaviour(*). You
have to remember that a lot of early digital hardware was designed by RF engineers who only ever
experienced the harmonic oscillator and resonant systems, not the heaviside step.
(*) current switching transients are absorbed by nearby static loads in bias circuitry, reducing the
severity of voltage transients on the supply. CMOS has no such robustness.
... I think it's the other way around in this case TTL is a great source of noise of itself. If the supply line is shared with any analog circuitry or other noisy TTL's then the inductor will help to Decouple that noise. The resistor might take a little bit of the edge off of the noise generated from the TTL as well by lowering the "Q" factor of any harmonic oscillations that could occur. Remember, even though there aren't any physical capacitors there are parasitic capacitors that are formed within the IC mostly snubbed by a back to back parasitic diode effect within the TTL but still present.
http://williamson-labs.com/480_byp.htm
might be analog peripherals nearby. Nice animation of the development of decoupling through
the ages on that site, BTW