Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Emergency Phones: Landlines or Cell? — Parallax Forums

Emergency Phones: Landlines or Cell?

ercoerco Posts: 20,256
edited 2013-11-29 19:23 in General Discussion
More & more people are ditching their landlines in favor of cellphones. Good idea or not?

I used to assume that after a major disaster (earthquake or hurricane) that if telephone coverage was interrupted, that landline repair would have priority over cell phone tower repair (which would be up to the numerous private carriers). Now I'm starting to wonder. Aren't there mobile emergency cell towers that can be deployed rapidly? Maybe swamped easily. We're keeping our landline for the foreseeable future at any rate.

Of course, if your phone is bundled with your TWC/Comcast cable & internet, it's a different story since you're not using the phone lines. Then there's Verizon FIOS, so who knows?

Anyone in or near a disaster area have any experience to relate? IIRC, Hanno was in NZ near a big quake this year.
«13

Comments

  • potatoheadpotatohead Posts: 10,261
    edited 2013-11-01 21:16
    Cell, skype, e-mail.

    Lost the land line on my last move. Didn't bother to get another one.
  • NWCCTVNWCCTV Posts: 3,629
    edited 2013-11-01 21:39
    I have been considering dumping my land line for a while now. I use Centurylink for that and my DSL and they now offer DSL only. I never use it and the only calls that ever come in on it are telemarketers so it seems like a wise choice. I would save about $80.00 a month or so. I am considering trying a Magic Jack since they now use power lines for transmission and I could keep my current number. In a disaster I think erco is correct in that they do have mobile towers that could easily be deployed. I believe the need for them was realized after 9/11 when the cell antennas on top of the towers came down and no one could make calls.
  • User NameUser Name Posts: 1,451
    edited 2013-11-01 21:43
    I used to climb towers a lot (as part of "Other Duties As Assigned"). Gotta say that the cell towers I see being installed nowadays are as robust (bombproof!) as any towers I've ever seen. They are clearly being built to cope with "The Big One." Sure does seem to me that government is looking at cellphones as THE communication resource in time of disaster. Landliners will slowly but surely return to Mother Earth.
  • ercoerco Posts: 20,256
    edited 2013-11-01 21:51
    A friend of a friend owns a garage & property on a hilltop nearby. Some cell provider came in and leased a tiny corner of his lot and put up a cell tower antenna, and they're paying him pretty decent money for it. I wonder if he's shortening his life, working all day in such close proximity to a cell transmitter.
  • Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi)Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi) Posts: 23,514
    edited 2013-11-02 00:21
    When power is interrupted, landline phones still work, because switching faciltites have massive battery backup systems in place. I do not know if cellphone towers have anything equivalent. And your ISP almost certainly does not, so forget IP phones. In any such case, you're relying upon an intermediary for communication. For total disintermediation during an emergency, a ham radio license and a battery-powered transceiver are your best bet.

    -Phil
  • Heater.Heater. Posts: 21,230
    edited 2013-11-02 02:02
    Phil,

    "disintermediation", great, my new word of the day.

    I have not seen a phone hanging off a wall socket since last century. I last saw a public telephone box about five years ago. It registered in my mind as it was being removed at the time.

    The HAM radio is definitely the way to go. Never mind the license, in an emergency no one is going to worry you about that:)
  • Duane C. JohnsonDuane C. Johnson Posts: 955
    edited 2013-11-02 04:05
    Hi NWCCTV;
    NWCCTV wrote: »
    and I could keep my current number
    This statement in advertisements irks me.

    They make it sound like they are doing you a favor.

    The fact is all carriers are "Required" by federal regulations to transfer your phone number.

    Duane J
  • GadgetmanGadgetman Posts: 2,436
    edited 2013-11-02 04:41
    Just clearing up a few things...

    Yes, the companies have mobile masts they an put up; they're often deployed for large events.
    but... They will need prepared land-lines or other link to work.

    Battery power is expensive. Most transmitters have 2Hours or less backup power.
    Depending on importance, ease of accessibility and expected 'worst case' power interruption, it may even be as low as 30 minutes.
    (Unless there's legislation in place, of course)

    I KNOW this because last winter, a whole region in Norway was without power for an extended period during and after some really sh!tty weather, and GSM started dropping out...
    Lets just say that a lot of satellite phones were sold afterwards.

    Main phone witching centres have not only battery power, but also standby diesel-powered generators.
    How many others also have generators also depends on their importance, the odds of protracted power-outs, how easily power or traffic can be rerouted.

    If there's a massive failure in the cabling somewhere, the techs will fix 'internal infrastructure' first, then start on landlines in a prioritised order.
    The lines connecting the cell towers to the switching centres is pretty high up on the internal infrastructure list. Individual homes are pretty low on the landlines list. (They will fix as many breaks as possible in one spot, before leaving for the next, if they believe they have time, though, so living near a hospital can be helpful. Town hall I'm not all that certain about... )
  • Cluso99Cluso99 Posts: 18,069
    edited 2013-11-02 04:56
    It used to be that the telephone exchanges had big banks of batteries and diesel generators. Nowadays, the switching is computerised. I wonder if the exchanges still have the diesel generators. Of course, the landline telephone is supposed to work without house power - that's what the batteries supply to the home telephone (48V). Now, many of you will use a wireless phone attached to your phone line and this requires power (not from the phone line). So without power, do you have an old phone to plug in in an emergency???

    I have not had a landline for >10 years. It was a bit hard when we lived on the boat for a number of years, and we have just kept it that way since moving ashore.

    In an emergency, I think the telcos will try and get mobile towers back first because they provide the biggest numbers for the simplest work.

    I have an Amateur License and a Marine License. My marine 2ways work, but since my ham radios are stored away I don't expect they will be of much use.

    Anyway, it's fairly safe where we are here in Oz. The bush is not that close, and we have a boat in case of floods although not likely here. Famous last words???
  • pmrobertpmrobert Posts: 675
    edited 2013-11-02 05:26
    In 2004 S FL experienced 3 hurricanes in 5 weeks after 18 years of no significant storms and lush vegetation growth. Pretty much anything that was hung on poles ended up on the ground as did all nonnative trees and some native ones. Landlines were gone the first 30 minutes of the first storm as was power. Cell networks were quickly overloaded and were inaccessible due to too much voice traffic. Texting worked well until the batteries at cell sites started dying the next day or so. ATT, loathed by many locals but apparently big or smart enough to place sites on facilities with big generators, was the only company to stay up consistently for data. Voice didn't work for 1.5 months or so depending on where you were at. Cable was down as long as the landlines - the distribution amps are colocated with POTS equipment and the lines are paralleled. I was a Fire Rescue officer tasked with emergency comms at the time and we had a program in place to facilitate emergency comms with most of our numerous large retiree developments using VHF Ham and several repeaters throughout the County. After our 800mHz (single master controller Motorola smartZone system for a county of ~1,000,000 residents, go figure) system went down Fire Rescue and some LEOs were being serviced by VHF Ham communications. I personally was on generator for over a month and I don't live "in the sticks". Oh, HF Ham was instrumental in out of area comms and the local Hams had a pretty good message delivery system to let out of state relatives know things were OK. I was also heavily involved with Hurricane Andrew (1992) - what a difference 18 years makes! Andrew destroyed all infrastructure, there were no backup plans like we had in 2004 and was an expensive learning experience. In 1992, emergency comms were just not there afterwards - physical infrastructure was just gone, along with things like 500 head of cattle and an entire exotic animal zoo that probably ended up in the Everglades. Motorola was the unsung hero - they just showed up with portable repeaters and cases and cases of portable radios and batteries and chargers. The repeaters were located in FD 100' elevated platforms and worked well for the duration. Got a little carried away with that but it was a heck of a life experience.
  • ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
    edited 2013-11-02 07:58
    ...For total disintermediation during an emergency, a ham radio license and a battery-powered transceiver are your best bet....

    I totally agree. However, before you can even think of asking for assistance, be prepared to slog through long conversations with octogenarians concerning hip replacements, knee replacements, back surgery, cataract surgeries, and how the government is trying to take over the Medicare system. Orrr be ready to tune in to doomsday preppers who, from their concrete bunkers stocked with pizza, homemade bullets, and diet Pepsi, like to say "toldja so" about the end of the world.

    67_1_b.jpg
  • tonyp12tonyp12 Posts: 1,951
    edited 2013-11-02 08:03
    Hurricane Wilma, no power for 20days and as the poles are also shared with Comcast and landline phones, I guess everything where out. (I don't have landline)
    Cell worked all the time,
  • Mike GreenMike Green Posts: 23,101
    edited 2013-11-02 08:51
    Re #12, it's a cute picture, but the reality is that, in most metropolitan areas, there are active amateur radio clubs that have practice disaster drills periodically, usually have a good relationship with the local police, fire depts, etc. and provide some communications for things like marathons and other large events as practice for disaster support.
  • skylightskylight Posts: 1,915
    edited 2013-11-02 09:19
    If all else fails a good megaphone close to hand is a good option.
  • jonesjones Posts: 281
    edited 2013-11-02 09:42
    I live in a mountain area and there's no cell coverage at my house, so a cellphone is out during a disaster (or any time, for that matter). The only real disasters I've actually had to deal with were wildfires, which are as happy to burn poles as they are to burn trees so neither cell nor landline was available. I do have a ham license, but since I had to evacuate to an area that still had full communications, none of the above actually mattered except that it's damnably difficult to find out whether one's home is still standing. In the event that it actually did matter, I'd second the suggestion about getting a ham license. Like most other things during disasters, being able to provide your own communications is going to be more reliable than expecting someone else to do it. A satellite phone would no doubt work too, but is a lot more expensive than a handheld radio. The safest assumption is that ALL infrastructure will be unavailable for a time after a disaster. That includes power to recharge the radio batteries, so keep that in mind too.
  • Peter KG6LSEPeter KG6LSE Posts: 1,383
    edited 2013-11-02 10:54
    HAM radio is , my first pick . .erco you Live near the TRW swapmeet where I got my call ( gasp ) , more then 10 years ago . W6TRW is the club call. and being in SO Cal you have a TON of hams and the bands are packed night and day .


    as far as POTS goes . unless you have copper all the way back to the CO , you might as well have a soft-phone .

    I live accross the street from the main CO for all of the city :) in fact I have been in it! as a guest ...... ( I had to pick my jaw off the floor when I saw the Batt room ) Yet I have only Fiber and no POTS .....

    I dont worry ...... with my HT and a few AAs I can do anything .


    Peter
  • GordonMcCombGordonMcComb Posts: 3,366
    edited 2013-11-02 12:25
    In addition to ham there's still CB. Transceivers are small and cheap, and a 4 or 12 watt (depending on type) unit isn't very expensive. I still have one I got years ago, never used but kept for emergencies, should one every occur. Channel 9 is still reserved for emergency use, but in a calamity, I'm sure all 40 channels will be very active.

    The problem with cell phones is the inevitable swamping of the lines that will occur in any emergency. There just aren't enough lines available. The same thing happens with land lines, but it's worse with cell phones. Your tower may have power, but you may not be able to get through because everyone else in your neighborhood is trying to do the same.

    For IP-based phones that you get through your ISP, most ISPs actually do have UPS-backed systems, but likely you don't, unless you've thought of it. Most cable and DSL modems are powered from the wall. You either need a UPS, an inverter, or rig up something to power the unit directly from some other DC source. Most people won't have any of these.

    The San Diego area had a major power outage a few years back, and it lasted a day or two. Unprecedented for here, but it demonstrated the usefulness of those wind-up rechargeable radios. I had to go out to the car in order to listen to news reports. A 9-volt transistor battery AM radio would have worked, but the nearby drugstore didn't have any. Said they sold out of them sometime in the 70s. I blame disco.
  • PoundSign2PoundSign2 Posts: 129
    edited 2013-11-02 12:29
    erco wrote: »
    More & more people are ditching their landlines in favor of cellphones. Good idea or not?

    I used to assume that after a major disaster (earthquake or hurricane) that if telephone coverage was interrupted, that landline repair would have priority over cell phone tower repair (which would be up to the numerous private carriers). Now I'm starting to wonder. Aren't there mobile emergency cell towers that can be deployed rapidly? Maybe swamped easily. We're keeping our landline for the foreseeable future at any rate.

    Of course, if your phone is bundled with your TWC/Comcast cable & internet, it's a different story since you're not using the phone lines. Then there's Verizon FIOS, so who knows?

    Anyone in or near a disaster area have any experience to relate? IIRC, Hanno was in NZ near a big quake this year.


    I actually ditched my cell phone in favor of a land line. So much cheaper (ironic) and more reliable.
  • davejamesdavejames Posts: 4,047
    edited 2013-11-02 13:00
    In addition to ham there's still CB. Transceivers are small and cheap, and a 4 or 12 watt (depending on type) unit isn't very expensive. I still have one I got years ago, never used but kept for emergencies, should one every occur. Channel 9 is still reserved for emergency use, but in a calamity, I'm sure all 40 channels will be very active.

    Yup - still have my GE 40CH handhelds and a GE 40CH mobile unit...just in case.

    No habla "cell phone"; don't want one, don't need one, and after working with RF I'm not too keen of having 2W of +900MHz radiating directly into my brain. So that relegates me to a landline, which includes my DSL connection.
  • davejamesdavejames Posts: 4,047
    edited 2013-11-02 13:03
    Orrr be ready to tune in to doomsday preppers who, from their concrete bunkers stocked with pizza, homemade bullets, and diet Pepsi, like to say "toldja so" about the end of the world.

    Pizza? Darn! I forgot to stock up on PIZZA!

    :thumb:
  • kwinnkwinn Posts: 8,697
    edited 2013-11-02 13:09
    erco wrote: »
    A friend of a friend owns a garage & property on a hilltop nearby. Some cell provider came in and leased a tiny corner of his lot and put up a cell tower antenna, and they're paying him pretty decent money for it. I wonder if he's shortening his life, working all day in such close proximity to a cell transmitter.

    RF is not ionizing radiation so the only effect on tissue would be heating. Since blood flow carries and disperses heat throughout the body the effect of being near an antenna that puts out a few watts at most would be far less than the sun shining on your skin.
  • Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi)Phil Pilgrim (PhiPi) Posts: 23,514
    edited 2013-11-02 13:27
    Cluso99 wrote:
    So without power, do you have an old phone to plug in in an emergency???
    That would be a yes:

    attachment.php?attachmentid=104732&d=1383424023

    It's not secure, though.

    -Phil
    648 x 486 - 51K
  • ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
    edited 2013-11-02 18:57
    erco wrote: »
    ...

    Anyone in or near a disaster area have any experience to relate?...

    Hurricane Sandy knocked out our power for 4 days and, if I remember correctly, it took out our land line, too.
    The year before that, Hurricane Irene knocked out our power for 5 days but I think it left the land line alone.
    Both incidents knocked out the internets (which, for us, I think depend on the local power system.)
    In the immediate aftermath of both storms, we had cell phone service.
    In both situations our roads looked like a logging operation.

    The reality of massive disasters is that you're pretty much on your own in the immediate aftermath, whether you've got communications or not. For at least a while, you're just another droplet of desperation in an endless sea.
  • jonesjones Posts: 281
    edited 2013-11-02 22:20
    kwinn wrote: »
    RF is not ionizing radiation so the only effect on tissue would be heating. Since blood flow carries and disperses heat throughout the body the effect of being near an antenna that puts out a few watts at most would be far less than the sun shining on your skin.
    There is a substantial literature on athermal RF effects, and even the tissue heating issue is much more complex than what you suggest. Whatever conclusions one might draw as to hazards or lack thereof, the question isn't simple. At the very least, the dielectric properties of skin, blood, bone and brain are all different and affect how the RF is absorbed. Further, the details of the antenna and even how the phone is held can make a huge difference. This guy (http://www.itis.ethz.ch/who-we-are/staff-members/project-leaders/niels-kuster/) is probably the world authority on RF-tissue interaction and if you scroll down to his publications you'll get some idea of how much work has been done, particularly to work out the details of how and where the energy gets absorbed. And that's just Niels and his collaborators. There are other labs involved too.
  • LoopyBytelooseLoopyByteloose Posts: 12,537
    edited 2013-11-03 08:30
    Living abroad, I have to wonder if anyone would come if I called 911. Very unlikely as the number in Taiwan is actually 119, and then I'd have to sort through the language barrier. As a result, I keep the nation-wide Foreign Affairs Police 24 hour number on my cell. They would have to relay my dire message, or I would have to have two phones and have them try to translate from out of one and into the other.

    (This is getting a bit complicated and weird, isn't it.)

    Still I suspect that what I would need is neither a landline or a cell. I would need an advocate that speaks the local lingo with their own cell phone to get an ambulance or a police reponse to occur immediately.

    If that isn't around, climb into a taxi and ask for a police station or hospital.

    What's the worst that can happen? We are all going to die someday, right? Just let go and move on. ...toward that bright white light ;-)

    +++++++++++++++++
    My disaster experience is related to the 1989 Loma-Preata earthquake in San Francisco --- expect to be entirely on your own for 2 or 3 days without electricity and without adequate police services.. maybe without water. And if you live over six floors up in a building, nobody is going to climb the stairs to rescue you. .. .. except family.

    I have been told, when you are in trouble in a foreign land... grab an innocent looking young lady to help you. Nobody is going to ignore an innocent young girl, but they might just about ignore anyone else.
  • Peter KG6LSEPeter KG6LSE Posts: 1,383
    edited 2013-11-03 10:29
    jones wrote: »
    There is a substantial literature on athermal RF effects, and even the tissue heating issue is much more complex than what you suggest. Whatever conclusions one might draw as to hazards or lack thereof, the question isn't simple. At the very least, the dielectric properties of skin, blood, bone and brain are all different and affect how the RF is absorbed. Further, the details of the antenna and even how the phone is held can make a huge difference. This guy (http://www.itis.ethz.ch/who-we-are/staff-members/project-leaders/niels-kuster/) is probably the world authority on RF-tissue interaction and if you scroll down to his publications you'll get some idea of how much work has been done, particularly to work out the details of how and where the energy gets absorbed. And that's just Niels and his collaborators. There are other labs involved too.

    http://www.wirelessweek.com/news/2007/03/myth-cellular-tower-health-hazards

    the inverse Square law is a Fun thing

    One way to do that might be to put some hard numbers behind our general assertions that cellular towers pose no risk. As a worst-case scenario in terms of exposure to RF radiation, consider a cell tower located only 30 meters (about 100 feet) away, and transmitting a total of 500W effective radiated power (ERP). Of course, if you are only 30 meters from the transmitting antennas, you also are likely well below their horizontal beam centers even if severe downtilt is used. But for the sake of our worst-case analysis, let's assume that the full 500W is aimed right at you. In that case, the RF power density where you are standing would be 4.4 microwatts per square centimeter. For comparison, the FCC's mandated power density limits for continuous uncontrolled RF exposure by the general public are 600 and 1,000 microwatts per square centimeter for 900 and 1900 MHz signals, respectively. Even in our highly unlikely worst-case scenario, RF exposure levels would be well under 1 percent of the maximum deemed safe by the FCC.

    Of course, analysis based upon government regulations won't satisfy everyone, so here's another way to look at it. VHF TV broadcasts often transmit at power levels exceeding one megawatt ERP from antenna towers well within 1 kilometer of residential areas. At a distance of 1 kilometer, a 1-megawatt ERP transmission would result in a power density of just under 8 microwatts per square centimeter, still nearly twice our worst case value from a nearby cell tower. Yet nobody seems worried about health risks from VHF TV broadcasts.



    Head in microwave oven . Bad .........

    From what I remember Erco lives in a area I used to spend time in and there is a 50 kW AM tower with in his area .

    On the Whole the RF from a TV system is much higher then a Cell tower .


    I have never seen a 2W rated phone in a decade . last I used a moto BAG PHONE on AMPS in the 90s ..... Yea one of those 3 W wonders that ran on a lead batt .

    GSM is a tad more power then CDMA ...... and the latter can use as little as 60 mW - 250 mW NOT 2 W .......
    I understand there might be more then just thermal but you need to understand that IF people want to play the FUD card on RF they better pick on what Is a larger harm by math ,,,,,,,,

    and TV TX are some of the highest power Cont transmitters in the world .
  • W9GFOW9GFO Posts: 4,010
    edited 2013-11-03 10:29
    Heater. wrote: »

    The HAM radio is definitely the way to go. Never mind the license, in an emergency no one is going to worry you about that:)

    Quite true, in an emergency it is legal to use any frequency to call for assistance.
  • Peter KG6LSEPeter KG6LSE Posts: 1,383
    edited 2013-11-03 10:41
    GFO is on the dial . Heck its too bad the 121.5 is kinda dead ......... Trust me . you put a carrier on that freq and there are gonna be a TON of people looking for it......... the Civil Air Patrol is one of them whom does a ton of on land DFing for ELTs
  • rod1963rod1963 Posts: 752
    edited 2013-11-03 12:49
    Land lines or cell is a false argument in a way.

    If it's just a simple blackout caused by overloading, big deal. The power will be one in a day or so.

    However, if there's a natural disaster and no electricity options are going to be limited for the average person and they are going to have bigger problems than just the lack of being able to yack to their friends about the latest Game of Thrones or their buddies on the other side of the globe. For example I live out in the high desert right on the San Andreas earthquake fault. If the big one hits it means no electricity for water pumping and out here you don't last long without water and in the summer time it's nasty hot, we get days of 105-110 degrees.

    Water, radio and medical supplies are higher priorities.

    Personally I'd make sure to have extra cell phone batteries because it doesn't matter if the cell phone towers are working or not if you phone is powerless. If one can afford it, a small portable generator can be a big asset in such instances as well.
  • ElectricAyeElectricAye Posts: 4,561
    edited 2013-11-03 18:48
    W9GFO wrote: »
    Quite true, in an emergency it is legal to use any frequency to call for assistance.

    I wonder if that means I could open the doors of my three dozen microwave ovens, point them all out the window, and tap out a toasty SOS into the stampede of zombies that is sure to follow any natural disaster.
Sign In or Register to comment.