LM2937ET-3.3 voltage regulator with 5V output??
Moskog
Posts: 554
I needed 3.3V for a Propeller project and found an LM2937ET-3.3 that was bought from Parallax some time ago. The regulator was fed from an LM7805. After soldering and testing the PCB the output on pin3 was still 4.99V, not 3.3 as I expected. OK, I thought the smoke has left the regulator, even though I never saw that happend. -And I expected the regulator to be very hard to kill. Then I removed it from the PCB and put 6-7 volts from the lab-supply into pin 1 and 2. Still 4.9 volts on output pin. Did the same to an another unused LM2937ET-3.3 and still the output was 4.9 volts. Without any load. Have I got some 5V regulators with wrong marking? Could that be possible?
Comments
-Phil
As others have said this regulator is a bit fussy.
Reading the spec for the LM2937 carefully you will find it has a minimum output current requirement of 5mA.
For the 3.3V version a small 630Ω load resistor should be added. (3.3V / 5mA = 660Ω)
Duane J
PhiPi very eloquently summed up the quiddity of my electronics knowledge with a single stroke of his pen.
-Phil
Also, what is a tartar electrolytic? Did you mean tantalum capacitor?
Duane J
It sounds like you have 5V connected to one of the Prop I/O pins that was overpowering the 3.3V bus through a protection diode. Removing the Prop removed that connection. Adding the resistor lowered the impedance that the apparently higher-impedance parasitic 5V had to supply, which swamped it, letting the regulator do its job.
I would definitely check your connections to make sure you're not feeding too much current into one or more Prop I/O pins.
-Phil
I would have thought the voltage would be more like 4.3V to 4.4V or so due to the .6V protection diode drop.
Maybe one of the protection diodes has is weakly shorted which would bring the voltage up to 5V.
The 5mA load, 660Ω, minimum is mainly for stability and better regulation.
I don't have the LM2937 but I have used other low drop out regulators and they at least worked down to no load.
Anyway, I think you got the minutia of the problem right.
Duane J
-Phil