Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
Iron Man 3: Sensory Overload — Parallax Forums

Iron Man 3: Sensory Overload

ercoerco Posts: 20,256
edited 2013-05-15 02:37 in General Discussion
Jolly good entertainment if you throw logic to the wind. If one suit's good, twenty is better. Maybe fifty? Never a glitch. Never any fuel to replenish, just recharge in any garage & go. Like a Nissan Leaf!

Lots of plot holes. Movies have to keep getting more outrageous. After fighting gods and space aliens in Avengers, Hollywood had no where else to go. Naturally they make you wait for the last little part after the credits roll. Watch how long the list of computer animators is. It just goes on & on...

It was still fun. The first movie remains the best IMO.

I was a huge Iron Man fan in my youth, he was always my favorite. I still have several 12-cent IM comic books (dang I'm old).

Comments

  • rjo__rjo__ Posts: 2,114
    edited 2013-05-05 19:24
    Took my son to see it today. The police officer standing security inside the door was new, and it felt really odd to see him there.
    I felt as though he was watching me:)

    Do you suppose Robert Downey Jr. fell off the wagon during the filming and they
    just wrote his sleeplessness into the plot?


    Rich

    It takes a pound of speculation to produce an ounce of testing.
  • ercoerco Posts: 20,256
    edited 2013-05-05 19:40
    rjo__ wrote: »
    Do you suppose Robert Downey Jr. fell off the wagon during the filming and they just wrote his sleeplessness into the plot?

    I could believe they wrote his post traumatic stress disorder into the plot. Surely he gets anxiety attacks wondering where his next $50+ million dollar paycheck is coming from. :)

    PS: Couldn't agree more: It takes a pound of speculation to produce an ounce of testing.
  • Oldbitcollector (Jeff)Oldbitcollector (Jeff) Posts: 8,091
    edited 2013-05-05 19:55
    I'll probably wait for DVD on this one.. The 3rd movie in a series is usually a disappointment.

    I liked Robert Downey Jr better in Air America.

    Jeff
  • davejamesdavejames Posts: 4,047
    edited 2013-05-05 22:26
    Saw it today with my oldest son. It was a definite "strap-in and hang-on" type of movie.

    The small clips during and after the credits were quite humorous.

    But "Iron Man" was not in the soundtrack...:depressed:
  • teganburnsteganburns Posts: 134
    edited 2013-05-06 01:02
    I saw the premiere...

    I found myself counting all of the times physics was disregarded, And if you watched it you know towards the end it becomes pointless...

    And yes i believe R.D. Jr.'s ego has gotten a lot from IM3.
  • LoopyBytelooseLoopyByteloose Posts: 12,537
    edited 2013-05-06 02:48
    Iron Man 3 arrived in Taiwan about a week or so ago and I went with a friend. I did not see the 3D, but it is indeed very Hollywood franchise material. It was fun.. a lot of zooming around, his house at Malibu Point leveled to the ground, etcetera.

    But if you want to see a traditional movie with a good story and far and away places, I saw this on TV two days before Iron Man 3, and was deeply impressed. It was a huge hit in Australia, but hasn't been so popular abroad.. rent the DVD.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZZDpiCeUgo

    And if you really are frustrated with Hollywood, try Frederico Fellini and brush up on your Italinan with some great B/W movies.
  • NWCCTVNWCCTV Posts: 3,629
    edited 2013-05-06 10:26
    @Loopy B, At what point does that movie get better? My wife and I started watching it as it is on Netflix but soon got very bored with it.
  • LoopyBytelooseLoopyByteloose Posts: 12,537
    edited 2013-05-06 10:39
    I thought the story was a big improvement over Iron Man 2. And I think the story in Iron Man 1 was the best.

    I don't think it got better at any point. I just don't think it stated out bad. It was the first time I have returned to a movie theater since I saw a movie with the tap dancing penguins ... maybe 2002.

    I was obvious that many scenes were setup with very strong perspective clues in order to make the 3D better. But visually that made it seem more like a video game than a real story. At least Robert Downey Jr. has gotten his 175 million bucks for it. I haven't really seen a computer animation I liked since Toy Story 1, but I am a rather humbug old codger.

    I guess I am saying you need to see it at least on a wide screen with Dolby roaring in your ears. And it might be more fun in 3D. On a DVD, it might just be that you didn't get the whole intended experience.

    Rent Red Dog on a DVD... That I want to see again and again.
  • Pharseid380Pharseid380 Posts: 26
    edited 2013-05-06 17:14
    I saw a comment on Facebook that put it quite well. "If you want to see Lethal Weapon, see Iron Man 3. If you want to see Iron Man, see Avengers 2." Shane Black, who co-wrote and directed this one, did 2 Lethal Weapon movies. If you think about it, take out the super-powers and its a Lethal Weapon movie. I was an Iron Man fan as a child too (I figured out that it was too late to be born on another planet or to godly parents, but technology seemed doable) and today I find the best comic book movies incorporate as much from the books as possible. Did anybody else notice the original Human Torch in the Captain America movie?
  • JonnyMacJonnyMac Posts: 9,108
    edited 2013-05-06 21:06
    Naturally they make you wait for the last little part after the credits roll.

    That's not a bad thing -- you can see the names of the unsung in Hollywood -- many of my friends -- that make those movies what they are.
  • LoopyBytelooseLoopyByteloose Posts: 12,537
    edited 2013-05-07 03:39
    Well, knowing which three caterers fed the crew, who all the accountants and lawyers and bookkeepers are is a bit tedious. After all, these are not exactly the creative artists involved.
  • mindrobotsmindrobots Posts: 6,506
    edited 2013-05-07 05:55
    Well, knowing which three caterers fed the crew, who all the accountants and lawyers and bookkeepers are is a bit tedious. After all, these are not exactly the creative artists involved.

    NOT TRUE!! There's plenty of creative accounting in the movie industry!!!
  • Oldbitcollector (Jeff)Oldbitcollector (Jeff) Posts: 8,091
    edited 2013-05-07 09:21

    Rent Red Dog on a DVD... That I want to see again and again.

    Added to my netflix queue for next time I feel like watching a movie. Looks good.

    Jeff
  • LoopyBytelooseLoopyByteloose Posts: 12,537
    edited 2013-05-07 12:07
    Frankly, Hollywood has gotten into a revenue formula that is dependent on world-wide blockbusters and sequel franchises. It is a lot of special effects, animation, goodies like Dolby and 3-D, but they have left behind the tradition of a great story as that requires extremely adept translators to export world-wide.

    So we are stuck with a lot of silly movies that young people go to quickly to be wowed and want to see often. Nothing much for the adults that want more mature content... try the library.
  • JonnyMacJonnyMac Posts: 9,108
    edited 2013-05-14 14:07
    Well, knowing which three caterers fed the crew, who all the accountants and lawyers and bookkeepers are is a bit tedious. After all, these are not exactly the creative artists involved.

    And yet, without these "non-creative" types, the rest of us would not be able to do our jobs. It's a giant team effort -- those not in the business have a very difficult time understanding this.
  • NWCCTVNWCCTV Posts: 3,629
    edited 2013-05-14 22:24
    Nothing much for the adults that want more mature content
    I agree. Also, it seems as though Hollywood has run out of ideas. Fast and Furious 6, really???? I myself prefer older movies that used real stunt men and real planes, trains and automobiles. Although I think a lot of the work that is done on computers is quite awesome, it is all too noticeable. It's all about the bottom line.
  • JonnyMacJonnyMac Posts: 9,108
    edited 2013-05-15 00:37
    It's all about the bottom line.

    It is called Show BUSINESS, not Show NOT-FOR-PROFIT. Despite what many think and feel, studio executives are not stupid people. If there was no audience for Fast & Furious 6 it would never have been made. I never saw the first in that series, I certainly won't go see the sixth -- but that enough people will justified the expense of making it. It's business. And, sadly, in this Smile economy -- especially with the government on the necks of banks which has limited funds to small and independent producers -- what we're stuck with at the moment is studio fluff.
  • LoopyBytelooseLoopyByteloose Posts: 12,537
    edited 2013-05-15 02:37
    Sadly, the audience that Hollywood targets are the youth of the world via pandering to values that are edgy, questionable, impulsive, and exploit the optimized cash flow.

    What Hollywood wants is viewers that with view early, and view often. Anything less is considered mediocre.

    I learned to drink and smoke at 12 years of age via the world of movies. Neither of which have served me well. But that was the 1950s and 1960s. Steven McQueen and others also taught me to drive like an idiot.

    With the advent of a vast array of special effects, language based plots that address deeper issues of society are set aside for 'shows' such as Fast & Furious -- a world where the hero sets himself above the law and apart from it in a rather self-destructive mode that somehow only he can survive unscathed. Parents and mature adults just shake their heads in dismay at how obvious the ploy is, and how they too bought into earlier versions in their youth.

    No, the powers in Hollywood are certainly not stupid or foolish, but it is a self-serving agenda.

    And like the hero in Fast & Furious, Hollywood doesn't want to slow down and participate in serving a greater good that converts to less revenue, but wants to have ever increasing revenue while self-justifying the nobility of all this. Look at Disney Studios today and what was supposedly a committed family oriented policy at one time. It has pretty much caved in and us just following the mighty dollar.

    I am not sure where this world is going, but if there is a rather edgy mindless impulse to do just about anything, Hollywood will exploit such at the box office just to fill the seats early and with repeated viewings. If I want real content and thoughtful themes, I will look to books -- not film or TV.

    Once you have an established industry, you can always claim that the economy needs your contribution to the country's GNP.

    That may convince some of your worth, but it can really drag down the fabric of society. AT this point, the USA has become dependent on several large industries that justify their existence by a growing share of GNP, but may be at odds with a better world. The entertainment industries--- including gambling, the military-industrial complex, the gun lobby, much of the insurance industry, the 'ethical' drug companies, and corporate service industries (such as large temporary agencies which have buffered corporations from having to commit to more long-term jobs).

    Yeah, I know. You say it is just entertainment. I ain't real. But try to get the youth to slow down and think.

    Yep, movies are a huge team effort and those with an Actor's Guild Card have opportunites that the rest of us do not. That is Hollywood.
Sign In or Register to comment.