Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
License info suggestion - Page 2 — Parallax Forums

License info suggestion

2»

Comments

  • KC_RobKC_Rob Posts: 465
    edited 2013-04-02 16:42
    jazzed wrote: »
    Now you respond with a hateful rant?
    Oh, you're too funny! Mine's a "hateful rant" yet your response is not, and there's hardly a dime's worth of difference betwen them. I perpetrate "FUD," have made the whole question "my problem," simply for commenting on it; then I reply in kind, but it's "hateful."

    Yep, too funny.
  • ctwardellctwardell Posts: 1,716
    edited 2013-04-02 16:50
    Soooo.......anyway...

    It looks like we have some good reference links provided, my question regarding BSTC has a good answer, and I found out that it costs money to join the "free" software foundation...

    Other than that I'll get out of the way, pop some corn, sit back and watch the fur fly...

    C.W.
  • KC_RobKC_Rob Posts: 465
    edited 2013-04-02 17:06
    ctwardell wrote: »
    Soooo.......anyway...

    It looks like we have some good reference links provided, my question regarding BSTC has a good answer, and I found out that it costs money to join the "free" software foundation...

    Other than that I'll get out of the way, pop some corn, sit back and watch the fur fly...

    C.W.
    Yes, there are some good links and information provided here. (It costs to join the "free" software foundation... touche! LOL). I'll add one last link, which is in fact many links, that one could easily spend hours pondering: Questions about the GNU General Public License. (Oh, and this one mostly for a laugh: Emacs Has Been Violating the GPL Since 2009 .)

    Plenty enough has been said, the OP has what he needs, maybe more, so no need for any fur flying. Time to let it go (or so I hope).
  • RaymanRayman Posts: 14,665
    edited 2013-04-02 17:30
    Yes, thanks for everybodies feedback. I had the feeling that my concerns were already in the minds of the PropGCC developers.
    But, I was just suggesting that it be spelled out in black and white somewhere.

    At least, people now have this thread for reference.
  • David BetzDavid Betz Posts: 14,516
    edited 2013-04-02 18:50
    Rayman wrote: »
    Yes, thanks for everybodies feedback. I had the feeling that my concerns were already in the minds of the PropGCC developers.
    But, I was just suggesting that it be spelled out in black and white somewhere.

    At least, people now have this thread for reference.
    I'm glad this thread has eased some of your worries. We took seriously the goal of making sure that code written with PropGCC would be free of any GPL requirements. A lot of how we did that was by using code that Eric generously donated. Thanks Eric!!
Sign In or Register to comment.