Your input on the distribution of the microMedic kits
Ken Gracey
Posts: 7,392
Hey all,
We have about 100 kits to distribute - these are very expensive, but they're available for free. We want to be sure that these kits are well-placed with people who would really benefit from them. At present, we have a small group of representatives from Parallax, CMU and TATRC who meet once a week to review the applications. They want to make sure the free microMedic kits are placed with those who have the highest probability of a good success.
So far we've had about ten requests and several were appropriate. Some don't apply much effort, just submitting a bare PDF with their name. We also require a 1 minute video telling us a bit about your plans (which may change as entrant desires). Some have a thought-out plan that truly meet the intent of the contest.
And there's a challenge among educational entrants - timing. We will set aside N kits for them alone. They will take longer to submit their application as they may need to meet with an instructor or professor.
The microMedic kit is not required to enter the contest, nor are the criteria biased towards the use of the kit. So it's optional.
If you were on the microMedic "free kit review team" what kinds of criteria would you feel should be reasonably applied to choose who gets a free kit, thereby enabling the highest probability of success for TATRC?
Sincerely,
Ken Gracey
P.S. I guess this is also a cry to "raise the bar" and come up with some creative entries!
We have about 100 kits to distribute - these are very expensive, but they're available for free. We want to be sure that these kits are well-placed with people who would really benefit from them. At present, we have a small group of representatives from Parallax, CMU and TATRC who meet once a week to review the applications. They want to make sure the free microMedic kits are placed with those who have the highest probability of a good success.
So far we've had about ten requests and several were appropriate. Some don't apply much effort, just submitting a bare PDF with their name. We also require a 1 minute video telling us a bit about your plans (which may change as entrant desires). Some have a thought-out plan that truly meet the intent of the contest.
And there's a challenge among educational entrants - timing. We will set aside N kits for them alone. They will take longer to submit their application as they may need to meet with an instructor or professor.
The microMedic kit is not required to enter the contest, nor are the criteria biased towards the use of the kit. So it's optional.
If you were on the microMedic "free kit review team" what kinds of criteria would you feel should be reasonably applied to choose who gets a free kit, thereby enabling the highest probability of success for TATRC?
Sincerely,
Ken Gracey
P.S. I guess this is also a cry to "raise the bar" and come up with some creative entries!
Comments
Below that, I would list high school and college students.
Somewhere below that I would list individuals with really good ideas, lots of time, and apparently little money.
I will be submitting an application shortly (after making the video) for the kit for team AZbiomed. We really don't need the kit as such as I have come to the conclusion over the last few months of analog hacking with the prop tbat the PEK dip/breadboard method imposes the fewest restrictions. It may be another thing for you guys to consider supplying sensors and such on more of a demand basis as a way to further stretch the budget of this project across more entries. Most of the materials in the kit will not be likely used, for example the cuff will not, while a wallgreens NIBP cufc probably will be hacked into service.
Just an idea,
Frank Freedman
Team AZbiomed
Maybe so, but from a public relations standpoint, I think the kit is a great idea. It gets the ball rolling in a way that piecemeal offerings probably wouldn't. Being offered a "kit" to solve a challenge turns on a particular part of the human brain, probably left over from the days of the ditty bag when we were hunter gatherers hunting down the local sabre-toothed tiger.
Just a thought, not a knock,
FF
I know I can get the XBee for low cost, but not sure about the PulseOx...
If kits are in short supply, I'd waive it if I could get the PulseOx somewhere...
FF
So, I guess I'd be ok with letting it go to a more needing person...
I guess kits should go to the folks that are most likely to use more of the parts.
I also wanted to share this idea with the public as i dont have any idea how one would test it so we wont be doing it.
A causilty assesment device. basicaly a sensor pod on a uniform which would wirelessly transmit data to a head medic tablet. So if a medic has 25 people hurt he can determine who needs attention in what order. If a guys bleeding out he needs to be first compared to a guy with a broken limb in shock. Alot of this could be done via temp readings. It may be crude but the medic will have a better data set to determine who to look at first. Im giving this one out becuase i belive it could save lofes so if you can figure out how to test a bunch of wounded people go for it!
-Tor
This is a great idea, everybody that exercises could use this. Time interval, water supply level, body temp, ambient temp... I wonder to directly measure the hydration level of a person in motion?