OTP my stamp?
stleric
Posts: 13
For no particular reason, I got to wondering: If I wrote a Stamp program (BS2, let's say) that had no way to quit, just runs in an endless loop and used pins 1 and 2 for SERIN/SEROUT would I have just turned my Stamp into a OTP device?
If so, to avoid this OTP trap I should do at least one of the following:
1. Have a way to quit the program
2. Use don't use pin 1 and 2 for SERIN/SEROUT
3. If I do use pin 1 and 2 for serial comms, then use the DEBUG/DEBUGIN
Is that right?
TIA
eric
If so, to avoid this OTP trap I should do at least one of the following:
1. Have a way to quit the program
2. Use don't use pin 1 and 2 for SERIN/SEROUT
3. If I do use pin 1 and 2 for serial comms, then use the DEBUG/DEBUGIN
Is that right?
TIA
eric
Comments
As long as you have access to ATN, your Stamp program can be interrupted and a new program downloaded via SOUT and SIN.
OTP? Wazzat?
Originally PROMs were electrically programmable, but had to be erased with UV light applied through quartz windows on the top of ceramic/metal packages. This sort of package is expensive. Semiconductor companies began selling the same chips packaged in plastic as OTP parts. You could program them the usual way, but couldn't erase them through the opaque packages. Theoretically, you could erase them with x-rays, but this was not commonly used. They could be programmed once. This was used for stable production code where the cost of rare replacement was small compared to the incremental cost of the erasable package.
...thank you.
Yup - Intel 1702s...gotta love that quartz window:
Those skinny legs made them a bear to load into burn-in trays!
Nice.
Thanks
eric