Frequency Counters, Opinions?
Martin Hodge
Posts: 1,246
I've been looking for a good frequency counter and would like to solicit the opinions of those who have experience with these devices.
First, are the built-in "frequency counters" in today's modern oscilloscopes as good as a stand alone unit for low frequency measurement?
Second, what is you're opinion on something like this: http://www.ebay.com/itm/170874206465
Most of what I'll be measuring is < 100MHz clock signals all the way down to 1 PPS signals for time keeping.
First, are the built-in "frequency counters" in today's modern oscilloscopes as good as a stand alone unit for low frequency measurement?
Second, what is you're opinion on something like this: http://www.ebay.com/itm/170874206465
Most of what I'll be measuring is < 100MHz clock signals all the way down to 1 PPS signals for time keeping.
Comments
http://www.wsplc.com/acatalog/SUPER-HUNTER_Watson_Frequency_Counter.html
If you only ever want to measure frequency of logic signals I wouldn't necessarily bother with a special unit, a Prop can be pressed into service (actually having said that I'm surprised there is only one match for "frequency counter" in the Prop Obex...)
Simple counters are easy and cheap to make, it's not rocket science.
Quality is all in the reference.
Most counters allow the use of external references, usually 10MHz.
Really good ones use rubidium references
BTW, make sure the counter can do the inverse, or measure period.
And a big step up is in the front end.
The high end HP counters can also measure the analog phase of the last pulse in the string of pulses they can add at least 2 more digits.
Why is this important?
It, lets say, they added those 2 extra analog digits the count update can happen about 100 times faster than a similar resolution on a regulator counter.
Duane J
For that you need a Reciprocal Counter, and anything half decent these days, should use reciprocal Counting.
Check how many digits they do, and the timebase precision, and there is also this, for low frequencies.
http://www.daqarta.com/dw_freq.htm
I gave the Developer a nudge a while back, and he extended the precision and sampling choices, to allow better than Crystal values. - and I got him to add an update 'Winky' , as I could get mine to sit unchanging over many samples, and that makes you unsure if it is really working
Before, the display LSB was a limiting factor.
Some slope helps, as it uses linear interpolate to resolve the zero crossing.
If you have a 'nothing fancy' counter, you can push up the precision with a TCXO, or higher standard.
Or, you could wait for the Prop II - I think Chip has added some smarter features to the Counters, to better support Reciprocal Counting.
It reads the frequency on P0 and outputs to the PC @ 115200 baud.
It sends the frequency reading with milliHz 0.001Hz resolution.
Bean
Nice, I would tweak the comments just a little, to better match what actually happens in the code
I think this code also has a 'precision corner' - at low speeds the actions will phase-lock to the edges, and time values will be edge aligned, but at higher values the time given will not be so edge locked, as the SW pacing loop takes more than a half-period.
I think the error added is not large, and it will be added on a large edge-count, which can better tolerate small shifts.
Yes, once you have your 'gold-standard' you then know where you are.
Another point on the price/precision curve I quite like, is this one
http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/ASVTX-09-20.000MHZ-T/535-9702-1-ND/1578302
As a VCTCXO you can trim this to better then the default ±0.5ppm, if you have a GPS 1pps for example.