Shop OBEX P1 Docs P2 Docs Learn Events
70 Scouts, 140 model rocket engines, now I am sore and smell like Sulphur. — Parallax Forums

70 Scouts, 140 model rocket engines, now I am sore and smell like Sulphur.

Martin_HMartin_H Posts: 4,051
edited 2012-10-25 12:49 in General Discussion
Today was the pack's annual model rocket launch. Over the span of 2 1/2 hours an assistant and I packed 140 recovery streamers and engines. We then directed the scout to a launch pad where an assistant helped them launch their rocket. We then unload the spent casing, reloaded, and relaunched. We were close to one launch a minute which was quite a pace. We had a few misfires where the rocket doesn't leave the pad, and one loss of fins on takeoff with the predictable unstable flight. But overall things went off without a problem.

For the engineering meeting we're planning to build a small cardboard trebuchet. Which perhaps might not be the best idea, maybe we should stick with robots like last year.

Comments

  • mindrobotsmindrobots Posts: 6,506
    edited 2012-10-21 16:33
    Trebuchets are cool...of course, then, so are rockets...and well, certainly robots are cool....and certainly a robot with either a trebuchet or rockets would be a fun learning experience.....
  • davejamesdavejames Posts: 4,047
    edited 2012-10-21 23:17
    Martin - what were the range of engine sizes? A C-6 was the largest with which I ever played (some 20+ years ago).
  • HumanoidoHumanoido Posts: 5,770
    edited 2012-10-22 01:11
    Did any of the rockets loft a small cam for aerial photography and what was the maximum height achieved?
  • Martin_HMartin_H Posts: 4,051
    edited 2012-10-22 06:24
    davejames wrote: »
    Martin - what were the range of engine sizes? A C-6 was the largest with which I ever played (some 20+ years ago).

    This year was windy, so we mostly used A engines, with a few B's to see how the wind would take them. One leader put a C6 into a personal rocket and nearly lost it.

    Last year we had perfect conditions, so we would occasionally throw a C6 into the mix so things wouldn't be so predictable.
    Humanoido wrote: »
    Did any of the rockets loft a small cam for aerial photography and what was the maximum height achieved?

    Last year we launched one with a digital camera, this year things were too windy. We've never used an altimeter, but a small rocket with a C6 will go 1500 feet under good conditions.

    When I was a teen I used to do multi-stage and altitudes of 2500 are achievable with black powder engines. If you switch over to composite engines that's small potatoes, but you need to get an FAA waver above a certain power. If you got that route, it is easiest to join a club and fly using their field and they coordinate with the FAA.
  • sylvie369sylvie369 Posts: 1,622
    edited 2012-10-22 06:59
    I've done this kind of thing with groups of kids going back to the late 90s. Seventy students is a lot - congratulations for tackling that. I've done that many, but usually it's more like 35-40, and even that many is a handful. Did you help them build the rockets as well?

    A young man in our club posted onboard video just this morning from his junior L1 certification flight (high power composite motor):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnBLKWxH4uM&feature=youtu.be

    An awful lot of spinning, and his parachute attaches to the wrong point on the shock cord (leaving the two halves of the rocket banging against each other), but a successful flight, and you get a nice look at the abandoned Air Force runway we fly from.
  • Martin_HMartin_H Posts: 4,051
    edited 2012-10-22 07:23
    sylvie369 wrote: »
    I've done this kind of thing with groups of kids going back to the late 90s. Seventy students is a lot - congratulations for tackling that. I've done that many, but usually it's more like 35-40, and even that many is a handful. Did you help them build the rockets as well?

    A young man in our club posted onboard video just this morning from his junior L1 certification flight (high power composite motor):

    The older scouts build them on their own, parents help their younger scout, we then inspect them and fix up any mistakes. I think there were only a few major goofs and we were able to resolve those. Yes,70 is a big group, so we split them into two subgroups and staggered the arrival time. That way there's less waiting around for the kids and it was easier for us to handle.

    That was quite a flight. I paused the video just as it was arcing over and it was a great view.
  • CircuitsoftCircuitsoft Posts: 1,166
    edited 2012-10-22 14:02
    In elementary school, a classmate of mine thought it would be cool to glue the nose on. The tube delaminated and came down much faster than a normal rocket would...
  • HumanoidoHumanoido Posts: 5,770
    edited 2012-10-25 12:49
    Martin_H wrote: »
    Last year we launched one with a digital camera, this year things were too windy. We've never used an altimeter, but a small rocket with a C6 will go 1500 feet under good conditions.
    That's really great! If you could launch from the roof of a tall skyscraper or tower, one like the Shanghai World Financial Trade Center is already 1,599.1 feet high. Of course, getting permission is another story. The observation deck is enclosed glass at SWFC but open to the sky on Taipei 101 and a magnificent experience.
Sign In or Register to comment.